Am Dienstag, 21. Juni 2016, 18:51:32 schrieb Stephan Mueller:
Hi,
So.. again, I'd avoid using the "fast" accessor unless there is a clear need or obvious benefit. Which should be documented.
So, you suggest ktime_get_raw_ns? If yes, let me test that for one use case.
I tested ktime_get_raw_ns and it exhibits the same results as ktime_get_raw_fast_ns and RDTSC. So, I see no objections in using ktime_get_raw_ns.
Ciao Stephan