On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 7:39 AM Sumit Garg sumit.garg@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 at 22:44, Daniel Thompson daniel.thompson@linaro.org wrote:
On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 02:41:01PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 at 19:10, Ard Biesheuvel ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 at 12:08, Sumit Garg sumit.garg@linaro.org wrote:
Add bindings for OP-TEE based optional hardware random number generator identifier property. It could be used on ARM based devices where entropy source is not accessible to normal world (linux in this case).
Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg sumit.garg@linaro.org
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/firmware/linaro,optee-tz.txt | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/firmware/linaro,optee-tz.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/firmware/linaro,optee-tz.txt index d38834c..e3a4c35 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/firmware/linaro,optee-tz.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/firmware/linaro,optee-tz.txt @@ -20,6 +20,9 @@ the reference implementation maintained by Linaro. "hvc" : HVC #0, with the register assignments specified in drivers/tee/optee/optee_smc.h
+- rng-uuid : Optional OP-TEE based RNG service identifier in case
hardware entropy source is not accesible to normal world(Linux).Example: @@ -27,5 +30,6 @@ Example: optee { compatible = "linaro,optee-tz"; method = "smc";
rng-uuid = "ab7a617c-b8e7-4d8f-8301-d09b61036b64";If OP-TEE is going to expose devices in this way, it should be modeled more like a bus driver, i.e., sub-nodes that represent the devices, with compatible strings, and perhaps even 'reg' properties for the UUIDs.
This is something Daniel also suggested during our discussion. But we agreed to discuss in upstream to get more feedback.
I think generic TEE should be modelled as a bus driver with devices identified via UUIDs, probably queried from underline implementations like OP-TEE regarding which resident devices (pseudo-TA UUIDs) it supports. Then this list of device UUIDs can be compared against child driver's UUID as part of match callback during driver registration. Also the child driver could maintain list of device UUIDs which it supports.
If we go via this approach we may not require device tree entry for corresponding device UUIDs.
That's pretty much aligned with my thinking.
Having said that I had wondered whether all TEEs would be prepared to describe the set of available UUIDs since AFAIK UUID enumeration isn't part of the GlobalPlatform standards so it is not implemented by GP based TEEs (such as OP-TEE).
Is it feasible to extend OP-TEE to enumerate the available UUIDs? If nothing else can it provide an (optional) pseudo TA to provide such a service? Personally I'd be OK with a kernel TEE bus infrastructure that mandated such a service (e.g. a TEE that does not provide the service can only interact with TEE from userspace).
Following is the kernel interface for OP-TEE device enumeration that I would like to propose:
/*
- Get next OP-TEE based kernel device
- Secure world can provide support for resident kernel devices/services
- as pseudo/early trusted applications. So this function is used to
- enumerate OP-TEE based kernel devices.
- Call register usage:
- a0 SMC Function ID, OPTEE_SMC_GET_NEXT_DEVICE
- a1-6 Not used
- a7 Hypervisor Client ID register
- Possible return values:
- OP-TEE OS returns next device UUID.
- a0 OPTEE_SMC_RETURN_OK
- a1-4 Device UUID
- a5-7 Preserved
- OP-TEE OS does not recognize this function.
- a0 OPTEE_SMC_RETURN_UNKNOWN_FUNCTION
- a1-7 Preserved
- OP-TEE OS done with device enumeration.
- a0 OPTEE_SMC_RETURN_ENOTAVAIL
- a1-7 Preserved
*/ #define OPTEE_SMC_FUNCID_GET_NEXT_DEVICE 15 #define OPTEE_SMC_GET_NEXT_DEVICE \ OPTEE_SMC_FAST_CALL_VAL(OPTEE_SMC_FUNCID_GET_NEXT_DEVICE)
Also at OP-TEE end, we should add additional TA_FLAG_KERNEL_DEVICE to detect particular pseudo/early TA as a kernel device during enumeration.
I'd rather provide this enumeration via a pseudo TA, to keep the SMC interface as small as possible. The pseudo TA can be optional, if it's not available then there's no need to try to instantiate any dependent drivers either.
- Jens
-Sumit
Daniel.