This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3.

discards 29438816 onsuccess: #120: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards c8ebc75d onsuccess: #119: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 5785c3ee onsuccess: #118: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 72f10fc8 onsuccess: #116: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 03f784a9 onsuccess: #108: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 6325e627 onsuccess: #103: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 88949be7 onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 755f5815 onsuccess: #88: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 57e3e663 onsuccess: #87: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards e4624fb7 onsuccess: #86: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards e4e22cad 120: onsuccess: #85: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 4d52ee0e 119: onsuccess: #84: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards b12edc16 118: onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards f3a1cd3d 117: onsuccess: #82: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 5766f234 116: force: #79: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 9312650b 115: onsuccess: #77: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 5470793a 114: onsuccess: #75: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 16d34e2c 113: onsuccess: #74: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 130f2ad4 112: onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards b3d8c465 111: onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards c1a417df 110: onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 15ab2019 109: force: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards b435e658 108: force: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 7b4beac5 107: force: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 6042b4b6 106: onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 7a586f84 105: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 7883c699 104: force: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 75eb48f2 103: force: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 5e372eca 102: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 80b06108 101: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 6e05c410 100: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 9c919fd9 99: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 2bec875a 98: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/g [...] discards f58f098f 97: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/g [...] discards 9b1018f1 96: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] discards 0b9b361e 95: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/g [...] discards 58a8a53e 94: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 63 commits discards 8c5dad76 93: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/lin [...] discards a560e2fb 92: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards f549d212 91: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] discards fddec1b2 90: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards f6fb9c2a 89: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 0261fa2e 88: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 808cf759 87: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards be0494b2 86: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 106 commits discards 0088b508 85: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 16% [...] discards 23c5fdf8 84: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -13% a [...] discards ed52271c 83: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 55d096e4 82: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc-1 [...] discards 85142085 81: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 16964 [...] discards 8f0c6691 80: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] discards c6d3a3b3 79: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 95 [...] discards 08262fc8 78: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 19% [...] discards 1dab4827 77: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] discards 687636c1 76: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 11% [...] discards 9406ea6b 75: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards f7a69738 74: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -16 [...] discards b95e277d 73: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% a [...] discards 90549837 72: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 commits discards 28ee2415 71: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits discards 73a4f58c 70: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% a [...] discards 0452d827 69: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards e779cbd5 68: force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 8d78c140 67: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] discards 40f2aa3b 66: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards af95b219 65: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 1b810926 64: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards ecf6b3eb 63: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 6bbbc188 62: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 341 commits discards 97b358f0 61: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc-1 [...] discards 8ce9e42e 60: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 9 commits discards 120f1554 59: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 32 [...] discards 8ebffa9c 58: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards ed8fdf1f 57: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] discards 1e17ef7f 56: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 46ccb779 55: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.9000- [...] discards 091aef1b 54: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards f929d074 53: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] discards f7392a6c 52: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards a1d35029 51: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] discards 28eeb292 50: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards a5f72752 49: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bas [...] discards 63075e0d 48: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits discards c37cbb47 47: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 54 commits discards 4dadb0c8 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK afte [...] discards befec6ef 45: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 0a554164 44: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bas [...] discards ad9499f2 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -7% [...] discards a59f1cfe 42: onsuccess: #543: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...] discards a075cd5f 41: onsuccess: #541: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK af [...] discards 766ae18e 40: force: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after b [...] discards 9b991166 39: onsuccess: #535: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 42a38f08 38: force: #524: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] discards 81c9957b 37: force: #523: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray:[.] _ZN3pov17Check_A [...] discards 70201d53 36: force: #522: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 892868fc 35: onsuccess: #520: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...] discards 6e008739 34: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 40ea3483 33: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 1f2290db 32: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 8a963142 31: onsuccess: #512: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new d685d0fc 31: onsuccess: #512: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 8adfb1af 32: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new efcdec61 33: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 87d7e229 34: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new fe15c319 35: onsuccess: #520: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...] new 46e54280 36: force: #522: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new b47b337d 37: force: #523: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray:[.] _ZN3pov17Check_A [...] new ac557a2c 38: force: #524: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] new 3c5a1d3e 39: onsuccess: #535: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new a23c5c35 40: force: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after b [...] new 88251be7 41: onsuccess: #541: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK af [...] new 9b6c6fdd 42: onsuccess: #543: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...] new 3589353f 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -7% [...] new 40313f99 44: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bas [...] new 9e838b58 45: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 67e43d35 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK afte [...] new b037e251 47: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 54 commits new 3fb204ed 48: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits new 5290c0ea 49: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bas [...] new b446e3e7 50: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 6653b61a 51: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new 07d3b2c8 52: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 20ede763 53: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new acba09af 54: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 84b3a77c 55: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.9000- [...] new 6b2d803c 56: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 2c846a38 57: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] new 426e83d6 58: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 936e7c38 59: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 32 [...] new 847e1c0c 60: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 9 commits new cb9c0e9a 61: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc-1 [...] new c0e20400 62: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 341 commits new 3ff07d2e 63: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 7cd0e9b4 64: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 98b260c7 65: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 44ae6a33 66: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 2e2f6f0b 67: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] new 79863160 68: force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 81e782c9 69: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 7e40a3c7 70: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% a [...] new 540e4b41 71: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits new 204615a4 72: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 commits new 466d3ad6 73: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% a [...] new f73f724b 74: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -16 [...] new 445e917a 75: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new 95959a7c 76: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 11% [...] new c32b8477 77: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] new 5c777dbc 78: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 19% [...] new d5587877 79: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 95 [...] new 01cd6a64 80: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] new 99dbada0 81: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 16964 [...] new df3260d1 82: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc-1 [...] new e32298ea 83: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 3925a43e 84: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -13% a [...] new 88a21c61 85: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 16% [...] new c2e03271 86: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 106 commits new 0c3490f0 87: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new ca0e0da3 88: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 7540958a 89: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new a6e71296 90: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 7eecd34c 91: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new b36e33b8 92: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new b6f02405 93: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/lin [...] new 7020b802 94: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 63 commits new bbc214f2 95: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/g [...] new b02f9b20 96: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new 6d1c81d8 97: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/g [...] new 87473103 98: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/g [...] new 5c06d80d 99: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new ef001e24 100: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new a130d5c9 101: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 32b7846d 102: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new c6f0cf1d 103: force: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 4530ebcc 104: force: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 51e67ebd 105: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new d7f9cdc6 106: onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 39c700ce 107: force: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 7dbafab4 108: force: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 4590a2ea 109: force: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 367af05c 110: onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 6a031e73 111: onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new e9f8483a 112: onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new d2723c75 113: onsuccess: #74: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new ff086a6e 114: onsuccess: #75: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new e9f47470 115: onsuccess: #77: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new b1294e17 116: force: #79: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 1fe94c8e 117: onsuccess: #82: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new f8e7d8fd 118: onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 8aff917d 119: onsuccess: #84: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 569ce004 120: onsuccess: #85: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 83d2a8c7 onsuccess: #86: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 1efd2b3c onsuccess: #87: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new f1d0c2a2 onsuccess: #88: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new e1f5dad5 onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new c5522bfe onsuccess: #103: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new a4525bce onsuccess: #108: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new fcd702de onsuccess: #116: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 27234c2e onsuccess: #118: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 146249e2 onsuccess: #119: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 906a5c36 onsuccess: #120: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new c1ce27a5 onsuccess: #121: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (29438816) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 101 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2592 -> 2568 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2624 -> 2592 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27588 -> 27228 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz | Bin 17844 -> 17728 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 92412 -> 92372 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz | Bin 72036 -> 72356 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 368 -> 368 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 8588 -> 8756 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 232640 -> 235208 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/make-glibc.log.xz | Bin 185252 -> 185304 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 215476 -> 217360 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz | Bin 181800 -> 183576 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 133 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 3496 -> 3528 bytes 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 109 - 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 7088 -> 6916 bytes 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results.log | 544 +- annex/bmk-data | 2 +- git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- jenkins/build-name | 2 +- jenkins/notify-full.log | 1067 +- jenkins/notify-init.log | 92 +- jenkins/rewrite.log | 22 +- jenkins/run-build.env | 6 +- manifest.sh | 4 +- notify/any.skipped | 0 notify/exe.regression | 0 notify/extra-bisect-params | 1 + notify/jira/comments.txt | 4 +- notify/mail-body.txt | 49 +- notify/mail-subject.txt | 2 +- notify/output-bmk-results.log | 101 + notify/results.regressions | 0 notify/summary.txt | 1 - results-vs-prev/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 119 + results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 254 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 172 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 3267 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 9517 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 585816 +++++++++---------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 24412 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 428 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 152 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3365 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 33698 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 586634 ++++++++++---------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 28854 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 292 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-full.csv | 3425 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-internal.csv | 254 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results.csv | 254 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 148 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 254 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3880 +- 57 files changed, 655464 insertions(+), 631944 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv create mode 100644 notify/any.skipped create mode 100644 notify/exe.regression create mode 100644 notify/extra-bisect-params create mode 100644 notify/output-bmk-results.log create mode 100644 notify/results.regressions delete mode 100644 notify/summary.txt create mode 100644 results-vs-prev/bmk-specific-variability.csv