This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.

discards 8acadb3c97 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards a14369b36e 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards c7b0889fc9 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 2ed803b7df 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 05f034d7e5 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards ee3094e354 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards e0d4548b53 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 0acd811ac6 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 442bec467f 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards c9e2c652be 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 1e206fb24f 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards fc89b9037a 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 5576e26611 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: n [...] discards cb3f21b604 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 2cb0321958 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards eb7f8363c7 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 085df58ddf 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% [...] discards 521ff5fc72 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% [...] discards e76c5bc553 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 1691c83f24 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 1089d90374 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 17a9e0752a 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] discards e3596361a0 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 355486cbd0 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 [...] discards 65d2c0d251 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] discards 2ad78022ea 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% af [...] discards 54ea94731d 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits discards 660a0ca498 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards 2d859ca3e4 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 1e927a8448 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards b31440f000 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 6da8da8094 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 2a03d38e0a 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards b12efd2b24 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 1b4e27692c 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards e20fc606c4 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] discards a78aecf791 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 380af1ca07 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK afte [...] discards af67b46a5c 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 802e38b88b 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] discards 266777fbaa 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 140bda1202 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards 8a86e62565 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 3f613e0e5f 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] discards e13aa58f88 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards 3686a36535 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build afte [...] discards fb51a61679 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards 9027f9cc19 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] discards 9f0ce31b83 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards b91be9dff0 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards c03caad728 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gd [...] discards 1163a8d51f 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards b0e2d9f4b1 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards d28deb2164 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build afte [...] discards e099774065 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bu [...] discards c0567fc5cc 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after [...] discards c8aa127841 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] discards 3e927968ad 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] discards 6001dc01b1 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 [...] discards fbc2d24ed3 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] discards 970548d19a 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits discards 80b8896591 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-41 [...] discards 330db0bc45 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] discards a6a28bc8ac 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 47103b9caf 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] discards 3dd9a4e9db 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards c00f210683 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 0fa634f4d6 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 2a569d9053 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 92db559e95 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 99ab0a1f03 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 636ed5736a 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 32b4e4fc52 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 6dc82d8376 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-416 [...] discards 2880e520db 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards ad199ba46c 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits discards d4c3a42820 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards de557f40b5 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards 1c101764d6 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits discards b0d25dc8d2 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards af6706036d 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 50583c50af 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-416 [...] discards 7e10d287a9 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits discards 334cf3b8e3 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 67f8fbff05 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards c1fa234957 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 3643f57a8b 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6 [...] discards 880169cd64 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 1b3fdc6753 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 927d470fe6 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 9d2c3397c8 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 1b0041ec9e 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] discards 46baa51993 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards ba795bc433 9: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 98beb316de 8: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by [...] discards 3c5a3cd73b 7: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] discards fd5ee2880e 6: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] discards 21311c3691 5: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] discards 121dfae0e0 4: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] discards 67e4b14e46 3: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/glibc: [...] discards 5f3e508b45 2: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 new a4c839534b 2: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 new 512e576a17 3: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/glibc: [...] new d3fc4e593b 4: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] new 390134705f 5: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] new be1b5d652a 6: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] new 8886f82a17 7: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] new 7526b9d1b1 8: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by [...] new 951881818f 9: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 076c6248bf 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 3462d5fc34 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] new 48e0c4dd5a 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new daa358877d 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new fcd83b9f7a 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 34ddd2abc3 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 225b32c718 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6 [...] new 54a62a146e 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 049c2033c4 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 0750f22d5d 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new e0961f748a 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits new 6eada05523 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-416 [...] new 12a3d395ac 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new ec92d09890 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 56b7b84369 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits new 36a4757aed 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new ca57ee9bd8 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new f5b6418a7c 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits new 627a06ec24 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new 83eeb04ca2 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-416 [...] new 8b6c918e4e 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 0356b47bb6 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 4a7b5dbffb 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 92ff617929 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 2d3b45ebde 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 1831efb797 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new f80b1c34cd 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 1c77e532d0 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new d19f4bc8b8 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] new 73061d4742 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 88f50255b8 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] new da69bbca84 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-41 [...] new 3d405dbac2 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new ca4721abaa 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new e73705143b 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 [...] new 3ace8465e0 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] new 7489eb60e4 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] new ba5d2e9e1c 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after [...] new ce646a8537 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bu [...] new c891860fb0 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build afte [...] new 6fdf2a5d2f 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new 08b2136f4a 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 566bb0e603 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gd [...] new af1ddc91e3 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new 9a5d38a188 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 6727364a25 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] new 1473083aa7 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new 644ce643c1 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build afte [...] new 8245ac2e19 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 743c185992 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] new b018f2af70 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 685e9f5cfd 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new 6919c2bb0d 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new f10bd3d4e1 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] new 84f5f62fe0 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 7dce352717 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK afte [...] new c82d468ac6 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 71609e911e 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] new f225e03c49 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 2d25b09c0c 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 3df5adff03 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 27f7d522db 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 31dc556783 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 33a580f250 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new c85ecf47a2 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new cc5a6560c8 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new 256a5e03e1 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new f2fdf19c8a 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% af [...] new ebbb788051 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new 5b9cc922e8 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 [...] new 6a44c99f57 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 9b6714f3c7 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] new 7dc093f0f4 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% a [...] new c5a01d7824 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 6fb7a5c10b 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new f82d352828 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% [...] new 8b551221f2 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% [...] new 8831d6fe7e 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new ab464c0bfa 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 994e0cedba 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new e3d0ad497b 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: n [...] new e7f7aaddb6 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 2b23567efc 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 7c835d82d1 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new c3f48fc6be 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 2b12ea75a5 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new ff0c391e41 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 1818e95607 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new fa520e10e7 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new b9b08c7a72 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 1f702fa8ba 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new c72645f257 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new c4109d38f1 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 0027cc4dcd 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (8acadb3c97) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2220 -> 2204 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2436 -> 2472 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 28616 -> 27168 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz | Bin 0 -> 17736 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 90908 -> 90672 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz | Bin 0 -> 70160 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 336 -> 368 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 7624 -> 8448 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 234392 -> 233644 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/make-glibc.log.xz | Bin 0 -> 185604 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 214824 -> 213340 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz | Bin 0 -> 179860 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 134 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 132 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4192 -> 4152 bytes 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 6836 -> 6916 bytes 11-update_baseline/console.log | 74 +- git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- manifest.sh | 28 +- results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 77 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 38 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/results.csv | 696328 +++++++++++----------- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/size.csv | 698904 +++++++++++----------- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 38 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 40 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 193 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 684504 +++++++++++----------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 697886 +++++++++++----------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 20834 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 728 +- results-vs-first/interesting-symbols.csv | 41 +- results-vs-first/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-first/results-full.csv | 203 +- results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 80 +- results-vs-first/results.csv | 80 +- results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3400 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 79 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 44 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 194 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 704092 +++++++++++----------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 706702 ++++++++++++----------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 20590 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 738 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 40 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 193 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 684504 +++++++++++----------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 697886 +++++++++++----------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 20834 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 728 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 41 +- results-vs-prev/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/results-full.csv | 211 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 80 +- results-vs-prev/results.csv | 80 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 4246 +- results_id | 2 +- 58 files changed, 2784401 insertions(+), 2860767 deletions(-) create mode 100644 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz create mode 100644 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz create mode 100644 07-build_abe-glibc/make-glibc.log.xz create mode 100644 08-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz