This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O3 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O3.
discards b294e594 onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 43355f23 onsuccess: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 9d52618b onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards c1c5d42e onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 04dc7df9 onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards e8e8fd71 69: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards e84ac6e9 68: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards d834d439 67: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 421678c0 66: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 9f4aea67 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards f7ded92a 64: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 46a3dbdb 63: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 9ddf4f18 62: force: #21: : [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bm [...] discards bb9e6980 61: force: #18: [.] strcmp [...] discards fa19fece 60: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 4a071154 59: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] discards 69dc4d6e 58: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards b0162c58 57: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards b7ef7f81 56: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 7b4e442a 55: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards d9dc91fe 54: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 631b6c57 53: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 05ab167e 52: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 293 commits discards ff6a0ab7 51: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-17-init- [...] discards de053262 50: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 61 commits discards e28db607 49: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards ae80633d 48: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 7b59ca84 47: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 81f18003 46: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 6c400318 45: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 80b4eb1c 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 603 commits discards 60b61c49 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 5b39de93 42: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 93aeb41a 41: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 993d19e2 40: onsuccess: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 5af8dd8e 39: onsuccess: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -7 [...] discards b4c93330 38: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards a72fdf94 37: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 4a21dee4 36: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 7c8ae4c6 35: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 043aaa46 34: onsuccess: #404: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 915ca6d0 33: onsuccess: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.9-4167 [...] discards 36dd4bae 32: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...] discards 9e4b74b9 31: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 78 commits discards eab6868e 30: onsuccess: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 [...] discards 96469fa0 29: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 958 commits discards 51f612e5 28: onsuccess: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 58e886cc 27: force: #393: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards f05092a0 26: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] discards 346b1190 25: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 623 commits discards db3d5eab 24: force: #386: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% a [...] discards 7424f6e2 23: force: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 939 commits discards 98c17fa8 22: onsuccess: #383: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards e23f3e85 21: force: #381: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 47a5f1c2 20: onsuccess: #379: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 1d935ff1 19: force: #377: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards ab2e2c96 18: onsuccess: #375: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 873be153 17: onsuccess: #370: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 5d602962 16: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1752 [...] discards c407d5c0 15: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 179 commits discards 6c6c60f3 14: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...] discards b1b9c318 13: onsuccess: #361: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 76227ba0 12: onsuccess: #360: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 257 commits discards a8f03006 11: onsuccess: #359: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 13cd06ba 10: onsuccess: #357: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 0fc6110d 9: onsuccess: #356: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -4% [...] discards 9913d738 8: onsuccess: #355: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 31 commits discards 7a1c794b 7: force: #354: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% af [...] new f50bec0e force: #354: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk_ [...] new d1f9cfdf 8: onsuccess: #355: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 31 commits new 59edd422 9: onsuccess: #356: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -4% [...] new 79189f0d 10: onsuccess: #357: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 87cc3f22 11: onsuccess: #359: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 86ad6b77 12: onsuccess: #360: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 257 commits new 117bd3ef 13: onsuccess: #361: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 32683eef 14: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...] new 690c654f 15: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 179 commits new 969db399 16: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1752 [...] new a0e020a9 17: onsuccess: #370: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 30244c74 18: onsuccess: #375: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 08020035 19: force: #377: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 350b0887 20: onsuccess: #379: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 85f166e4 21: force: #381: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new c28d7f35 22: onsuccess: #383: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new c22857d1 23: force: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 939 commits new 05129c4e 24: force: #386: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% a [...] new 20c1977d 25: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 623 commits new 7308dffe 26: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new 155c6734 27: force: #393: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 2c1c7b9b 28: onsuccess: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new c154427e 29: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 958 commits new 4fc45611 30: onsuccess: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 [...] new fc5516f4 31: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 78 commits new 61fdf27c 32: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...] new e2f6dc8c 33: onsuccess: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.9-4167 [...] new a19657f5 34: onsuccess: #404: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new fa19be87 35: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 580401fc 36: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ce060179 37: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 6f0f3a56 38: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 04d8c419 39: onsuccess: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -7 [...] new f88b80d3 40: onsuccess: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new dcf878d2 41: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 9e202558 42: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 4346c7a4 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 546be5ac 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 603 commits new 5f6b30bf 45: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new bf133be7 46: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 1baac59e 47: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new b48d6777 48: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 08f1e703 49: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 56ecdcce 50: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 61 commits new 293e044e 51: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-17-init- [...] new f04b6cb9 52: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 293 commits new 3f6d0d5f 53: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 91741b0f 54: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new a1a7086f 55: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 40c784ff 56: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 632904f0 57: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new a164cb78 58: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new e61e0b39 59: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new 393b66ce 60: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 53adfdf2 61: force: #18: [.] strcmp [...] new 0aa87ca1 62: force: #21: : [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bm [...] new 9e89f2c5 63: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new a7461c9f 64: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 47258483 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 1d8de04a 66: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 3a93e00d 67: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new c2f455cd 68: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new b0144268 69: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 01b6488c onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new d5794c64 onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 36ac4e4c onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 2b900ee6 onsuccess: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 37f4a380 onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (b294e594) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/l [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 68 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: