This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.

discards 0027cc4dcdc 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards c4109d38f1e 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards c72645f2579 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] discards 1f702fa8ba5 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards b9b08c7a725 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards fa520e10e7a 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 1818e95607d 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards ff0c391e41f 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 2b12ea75a51 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards c3f48fc6be5 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 7c835d82d19 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 2b23567efc1 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards e7f7aaddb62 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] discards e3d0ad497b2 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: [...] discards 994e0cedba6 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards ab464c0bfa0 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 8831d6fe7e6 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 8b551221f28 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% [...] discards f82d3528284 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% [...] discards 6fb7a5c10bd 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards c5a01d78246 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17 [...] discards 7dc093f0f4a 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% [...] discards 9b6714f3c75 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] discards 6a44c99f57b 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 5b9cc922e85 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 4563 [...] discards ebbb788051d 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% [...] discards f2fdf19c8a0 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% a [...] discards 256a5e03e10 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits discards cc5a6560c89 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards c85ecf47a28 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 33a580f250b 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 31dc5567831 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 27f7d522db9 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20 [...] discards 3df5adff03d 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 2d25b09c0c5 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards f225e03c496 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 71609e911ec 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] discards c82d468ac6c 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] discards 7dce3527177 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK aft [...] discards 84f5f62fe03 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] discards f10bd3d4e19 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 6919c2bb0d4 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] discards 685e9f5cfd0 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] discards b018f2af70a 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] discards 743c185992e 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 8245ac2e19c 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 644ce643c19 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build aft [...] discards 1473083aa79 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] discards 6727364a25e 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 9a5d38a1889 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] discards af1ddc91e3e 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] discards 566bb0e6033 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] discards 08b2136f4a1 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards 6fdf2a5d2f6 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run O [...] discards c891860fb0b 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build aft [...] discards ce646a85374 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline b [...] discards ba5d2e9e1ca 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after [...] discards 7489eb60e4a 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 3ace8465e04 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] discards e73705143b8 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 8 [...] discards ca4721abaa3 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bu [...] discards 3d405dbac24 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits discards da69bbca840 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-4 [...] discards 88f50255b83 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and r [...] discards 73061d47424 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards d19f4bc8b84 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] discards 1c77e532d06 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards f80b1c34cda 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 1831efb7977 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 2d3b45ebde3 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 92ff6179297 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 4a7b5dbffba 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 0356b47bb65 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 8b6c918e4e6 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 83eeb04ca2b 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-41 [...] discards 627a06ec24f 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 [...] discards f5b6418a7cb 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits discards ca57ee9bd87 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 36a4757aed9 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6 [...] discards 56b7b843690 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits discards ec92d098903 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 12a3d395acb 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards 6eada055237 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-41 [...] discards e0961f748ad 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 [...] discards 0750f22d5d6 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 049c2033c4d 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 54a62a146ef 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 225b32c7180 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by - [...] discards 34ddd2abc38 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4 [...] discards fcd83b9f7ac 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards daa358877de 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 48e0c4dd5a2 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 3462d5fc348 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8 [...] discards 076c6248bfc 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 951881818f8 9: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 7526b9d1b1d 8: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by [...] discards 8886f82a17e 7: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/lin [...] discards be1b5d652aa 6: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/lin [...] discards 390134705fa 5: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/lin [...] discards d3fc4e593bc 4: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/lin [...] discards 512e576a176 3: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/glibc: [...] new fb141191aa7 3: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/glibc: [...] new 8f407744725 4: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/lin [...] new e9dc92f4083 5: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/lin [...] new 9c363bf9d90 6: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/lin [...] new 61d11a6a1b8 7: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/lin [...] new 2dfbcdfc9d2 8: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by [...] new 138dc22d50a 9: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new c4a3a51aaa5 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 9f0cbb93a43 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8 [...] new d300ed3b08d 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new ee43a2f1ec9 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 2866368dec1 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 557657aac69 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4 [...] new 02a65324477 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by - [...] new 714333c898d 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new c38eb0d56a5 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 7d1e1685b65 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new d59e1cdeec0 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 [...] new b13bf3782d4 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-41 [...] new 2be796f0c67 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new dc7d82936be 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 680cc4c114c 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits new 20577c7c357 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6 [...] new d38accefa38 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 49771becb38 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits new d9f054edd01 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 [...] new 60dd75a2cd8 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-41 [...] new 6961d99bc05 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new c2e92095745 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 4b7f556e240 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 06907aa6dc4 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 2aa7014794a 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 0a3806f31ea 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new d5b53ced3a5 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 06cabe17272 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 6c600103862 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] new 88c9d4c1caf 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 16ee1c2fa6a 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and r [...] new dd6c2bb3d97 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-4 [...] new fd5873858c3 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new 9f114110f69 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bu [...] new 574dbab86ac 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 8 [...] new 5eba621d23a 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] new 2f1644a691f 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new c9d43cc85c8 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after [...] new b9beeae015f 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline b [...] new 6f2813e2a74 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build aft [...] new 9d23318f113 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run O [...] new 041958185c4 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new 2cefb209c65 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] new 4c3ef8ddb96 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] new bf3bb44739d 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] new 5f6923d0700 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 79d780857ec 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] new e2b15f300fa 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build aft [...] new e58f5cb8bb8 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new ddae8d03367 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 72ff705568a 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] new 8faae6f70ba 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] new c166ed1c534 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] new fc03242e75f 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new b83158a3eae 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] new 8cbad278822 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK aft [...] new 705e03ac6f6 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] new 064b6cff38f 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] new f000fdc07b1 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new f290878b1dc 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 9d4e4222d10 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new edad5118e78 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20 [...] new 4ec367cbcfb 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new a25e3de68e5 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 1a92c1173e9 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 3b484bf7fd6 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new aa946eb0d3d 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new 81730302c40 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% a [...] new 51d52aff6e0 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% [...] new 515451fdf00 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 4563 [...] new 32ca1a09b9c 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 53b64ab01b2 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] new 228c142876c 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% [...] new 6e521b395b3 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17 [...] new 175b5106a9b 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 5981ee911f2 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% [...] new 2741bdbcba8 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% [...] new 59f1878cff8 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 67b490cb374 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 4c666bec233 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 7295522e2d4 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: [...] new 7c6b3854bc1 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] new dcc669e7185 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 9add8ebf0a9 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new f055c95e462 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new e6cfeebb419 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new e5bc8eb7c9e 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 8cf2770b0ed 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 6971eda53a5 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 32a9bc9c393 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 9464f57371c 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new ae3df66185d 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] new 36a913de461 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 72b731575ae 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new afcdafe79fc 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (0027cc4dcdc) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2204 -> 2364 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2472 -> 2568 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27168 -> 28216 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz | Bin 17736 -> 17784 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 90672 -> 90488 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz | Bin 70160 -> 70792 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 368 -> 368 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 8448 -> 8584 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 233644 -> 233380 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/make-glibc.log.xz | Bin 185604 -> 185644 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 213340 -> 211404 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz | Bin 179860 -> 179764 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 148 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 146 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4152 -> 4140 bytes 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 6916 -> 7120 bytes .../output-bmk-results/diff-bmk-results.out | 1 + .../output-bmk-results/exe.improvement | 2 + .../output-bmk-results/exe.improvement.diff | 0 10-check_regression/results-vs-first | 1 + 10-check_regression/results-vs-prev | 1 + 11-update_baseline/console.log | 70 +- git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- git/linux_rev | 2 +- manifest.sh | 36 +- results-vs-first/cmp-results.diff | 1 + results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 82 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 38 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 177 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 60963 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 482538 ++++++------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 14098 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 429 +- ...ults-brief.csv => csvs2table-results-brief.csv} | 68 +- results-vs-first/csvs2table-results-full.csv | 104 + results-vs-first/csvs2table-results-internal.csv | 41 + .../csvs2table-results-internal.csv.diff | 0 results-vs-first/csvs2table-results.csv | 41 + results-vs-first/interesting-symbols.csv | 35 +- results-vs-first/results-full.csv | 105 - results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 80 +- results-vs-first/results.csv | 41 - results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3376 +- results-vs-prev/cmp-results.diff | 1 + results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 84 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 30 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 193 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 32910 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 644384 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 20000 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 482 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 38 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 177 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 60963 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 482538 ++++++------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 14098 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 429 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-brief.csv | 35 + results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-full.csv | 104 + results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-internal.csv | 41 + .../csvs2table-results-internal.csv.diff | 0 results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results.csv | 41 + results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 35 +- results-vs-prev/results-brief.csv | 35 - results-vs-prev/results-full.csv | 105 - results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 80 +- results-vs-prev/results.csv | 41 - results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 4342 +- results_id | 2 +- 71 files changed, 933116 insertions(+), 890702 deletions(-) create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/diff-bmk-results.out create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.improvement create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.improvement.diff create mode 120000 10-check_regression/results-vs-first create mode 120000 10-check_regression/results-vs-prev create mode 100644 results-vs-first/cmp-results.diff rename results-vs-first/{results-brief.csv => csvs2table-results-brief.csv} (52%) create mode 100644 results-vs-first/csvs2table-results-full.csv create mode 100644 results-vs-first/csvs2table-results-internal.csv create mode 100644 results-vs-first/csvs2table-results-internal.csv.diff create mode 100644 results-vs-first/csvs2table-results.csv delete mode 100644 results-vs-first/results-full.csv delete mode 100644 results-vs-first/results.csv create mode 100644 results-vs-prev/cmp-results.diff create mode 100644 results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-brief.csv create mode 100644 results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-full.csv create mode 100644 results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-internal.csv create mode 100644 results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-internal.csv.diff create mode 100644 results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results.csv delete mode 100644 results-vs-prev/results-brief.csv delete mode 100644 results-vs-prev/results-full.csv delete mode 100644 results-vs-prev/results.csv