This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O3 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O3.

discards 6879cd7aa onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 62d84c1d2 onsuccess: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 083f1a102 onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards dfb1f6ddb onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 9b5724a6a onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards cc3af59dd 69: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards ac1158be2 68: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards c945f6e6d 67: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards a705e08fa 66: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 8b49c6923 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards f324714d2 64: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 5f1cc3b04 63: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards d0dc6960f 62: force: #21: : [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bm [...] discards bd6d0f214 61: force: #18: [.] strcmp [...] discards cd6a7a246 60: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards fc8abb39c 59: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] discards b1b2fde37 58: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 116f711af 57: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 1dbaf3d03 56: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards b105ddcd6 55: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards a9f50f191 54: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards e50ddd800 53: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 42fcd8ba2 52: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 293 commits discards 2b52d6caa 51: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-17-init- [...] discards 1a3d5943b 50: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 61 commits discards 544b549d0 49: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards fd5a3ed79 48: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 752d319c9 47: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 7d168e44f 46: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 8061bc19c 45: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards ebd3f0c0e 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 603 commits discards d04999b40 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards e15d0c09d 42: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards fbaf424cf 41: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 64ad5adef 40: onsuccess: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 554ceaa67 39: onsuccess: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -7 [...] discards 4568e432e 38: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards dd483e29e 37: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards ba08ace97 36: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 9117c1c78 35: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards c9f744665 34: onsuccess: #404: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards eb7a4187e 33: onsuccess: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.9-4167 [...] discards f1c431a45 32: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...] discards e63a81d55 31: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 78 commits discards 0885f8b51 30: onsuccess: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 [...] discards 7e17378c7 29: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 958 commits discards 53797ea67 28: onsuccess: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 17821ee29 27: force: #393: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 254952650 26: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] discards 5407a0c4d 25: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 623 commits discards 35647da43 24: force: #386: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% a [...] discards 78f67017c 23: force: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 939 commits discards 0bf20143f 22: onsuccess: #383: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 47ddeccf9 21: force: #381: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 61ae1aa2e 20: onsuccess: #379: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards f90f4de9e 19: force: #377: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 3846c8071 18: onsuccess: #375: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards c68fa0961 17: onsuccess: #370: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 03bcd0df0 16: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1752 [...] discards 08d29e2e6 15: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 179 commits discards 65980f05a 14: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...] discards 55b3efb26 13: onsuccess: #361: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards dafe8168e 12: onsuccess: #360: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 257 commits new caf69baf6 onsuccess: #360: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 3d6d743bc 13: onsuccess: #361: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 87347a26c 14: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...] new 85213ecb9 15: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 179 commits new 4a73797bf 16: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1752 [...] new ede6c0db0 17: onsuccess: #370: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 10806e629 18: onsuccess: #375: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 1724724b5 19: force: #377: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 06b8caf47 20: onsuccess: #379: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 0cb6b6829 21: force: #381: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 5b3d007cf 22: onsuccess: #383: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 7bd090446 23: force: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 939 commits new b8ae7768f 24: force: #386: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% a [...] new 8843fbf42 25: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 623 commits new 51192417a 26: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new 68b151199 27: force: #393: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new caba56ef6 28: onsuccess: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e310dbeb6 29: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 958 commits new f6273005c 30: onsuccess: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 [...] new 7b67f8ee0 31: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 78 commits new 98c4a92e7 32: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...] new e82c9b37b 33: onsuccess: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.9-4167 [...] new 66602ab32 34: onsuccess: #404: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new af42a6ee7 35: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new a4c795329 36: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new a00488e13 37: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 35d6c2f9a 38: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 25fbbff22 39: onsuccess: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -7 [...] new 8bbdad48a 40: onsuccess: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e6e7aeb63 41: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 2a7dc22bf 42: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new b137807ca 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 4edfbf0fa 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 603 commits new f65bf9554 45: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new cbb7b53ad 46: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new ba87dcbc5 47: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new bf29f4189 48: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 11f40cfe9 49: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new bcc311fcd 50: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 61 commits new f95d457b9 51: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-17-init- [...] new b4753bb75 52: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 293 commits new 82bfac80b 53: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new dbd51ee13 54: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 54886c8e6 55: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 526764884 56: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 0b9e3333c 57: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new eca29e28f 58: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 87a24ab03 59: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new 4fc924b65 60: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new e2f96d8ac 61: force: #18: [.] strcmp [...] new 13986316f 62: force: #21: : [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bm [...] new 8b3c50bdc 63: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new fcff1a5c7 64: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 935730d7f 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 7beef99d1 66: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 332d1054c 67: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 27f21328a 68: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new b1a0726aa 69: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 310081676 onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 334cd454b onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new ddb60983b onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 8f343c2a4 onsuccess: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new dc526e221 onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (6879cd7aa) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/l [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 63 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: