This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O2 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.

discards b8781675c2c onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] discards 5a5f3bbee9c onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] discards 1e17e1b8765 onsuccess: #99: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 87853727e3e onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 805e883a3e9 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards b52e2c78447 onsuccess: #93: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards eb9e9d4d0b9 onsuccess: #87: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 64b79ce3a87 onsuccess: #78: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards aa824a9cacd onsuccess: #73: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 87c45e029bf onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards b02f900783c onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards a139fea18f6 117: onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards ea148f25c0f 116: onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 853ead18939 115: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards b60984e8ef0 114: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards b3900b2b461 113: onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 60e2fed5a8b 112: force: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] discards 5b79da68cee 111: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] discards 68781814c86 110: force: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] discards 016a9e936de 109: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 0fe0668f934 108: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 8e7d8123fa8 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 3f3e34f6378 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 4b7e7e6e099 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards fb661cc69e3 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards fe8edb28734 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards be4be06af48 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 84169d3bb89 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gc [...] discards f7e1dad4fe3 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-4846 [...] discards 54a0d445047 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits discards ccde9dd1cb5 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 23 [...] discards 3b0e39d3dbf 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits discards e3db8e4787d 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 279caa86fe1 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits discards 1ce6b81926b 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards d1d764f1b55 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits discards 3ec24e54479 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/l [...] discards 49e11cb8cb9 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 2541f3a1cff 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 2ae5df421b4 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25 [...] discards 1aac715008c 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 9dd066f0eb1 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards c757ac31a0e 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] discards 3adf3be1c93 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 85cc9921b5b 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 46859493fdc 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 0055feeff1c 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% [...] discards a568b091286 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] discards 996bc1adf2c 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-455 [...] discards faa2dfeedb7 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards c00efd491f0 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 85b801a70ac 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 52a0c6bc940 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards d00ec213177 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 [...] discards c270e33a1ab 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards c1a44698d5a 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits discards 44a5177aa57 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_ste [...] discards fb9c24350ae 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25 [...] discards 885c04efcfc 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 1e16f803f83 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards d800d579004 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards b70de7ea43a 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards 0670a6d3720 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards 9778e6e4696 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards f699b314eca 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slo [...] discards 95f2f0d7e1a 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] discards 5a49d16f052 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards 21688de8b07 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchp [...] discards 1cb0a46b94e 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] discards 09b6a306a7e 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] discards ad2ac5a36d8 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] discards 61e5ba4a526 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 645 [...] discards 987e8a8708e 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK [...] discards c534717686a 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 4db3ce2f846 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] discards cead692e8ce 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after [...] discards 9c4f78a7868 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after b [...] discards 3d3365779b3 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 3c79af2274a 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards eb1668d49f1 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 2e6bd0bf004 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards f181a86be2d 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build afte [...] discards 5130cbbf9d3 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards a899aad5c99 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards c791b79393b 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK af [...] discards 874fa4d0ac0 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards dca545f0c40 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 87d61e7bda8 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and r [...] discards c8ac627266c 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards db94b98e8ca 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] discards 17f18e2328a 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 [...] discards 49113db70e8 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards 919e05b6beb 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards d6e1048b71e 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and ru [...] discards 6afb3fcd5a1 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build [...] discards 5f0bd3cc16e 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 8645adb3067 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% a [...] discards 2970354d55c 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 2 [...] discards 96dbdcdf950 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 8550641616b 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 3 [...] new d571a24fd0a 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 3 [...] new 3446a550a4a 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 483ef2a56b6 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 2 [...] new 284794e1858 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% a [...] new 99674e4f245 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new c6e35c959b1 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build [...] new 73ba57511f8 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and ru [...] new d24e2e387ba 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 4632a1d5294 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new 857f603692a 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 [...] new 86e02cb3a63 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] new 62e48774040 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new b799a55dfa9 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and r [...] new 1998fad06ef 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new a00ada83364 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 3aabd693354 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK af [...] new badac3135bc 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 2731abaf77a 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new d89725d7dd5 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build afte [...] new dcf49aa9223 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new 79de3a123bb 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 26fb0b61ccb 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new f489f8d2f1c 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 9adf956ed39 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after b [...] new 987b80980c5 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after [...] new f1b3dd6c945 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] new c3bcd647fda 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new f54945115a4 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK [...] new 3973f845f62 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 645 [...] new 6e9c9f8f801 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] new 3d5f87be83a 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] new 965ebf6b1fa 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] new bb7644a924d 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchp [...] new 307b0614108 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new 1b6495de6b3 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] new cec3c8f8771 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slo [...] new 27eda47e4e9 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 4641a099475 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new 69e2bc2f806 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new 0e31ef34a1a 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 4de3409add2 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new de264205e9d 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 681804754bb 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25 [...] new 80216c31a1a 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_ste [...] new 90ef5e95b10 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits new 81277f211a5 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new a69a3fc58e0 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 [...] new 2ebab03f5e5 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 91c2be212a5 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 3c51976e1da 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 1c2418d6e8b 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 530a4e9f3c9 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-455 [...] new d3bf195e8dd 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] new f26da307f2f 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% [...] new 39ce1247c33 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 5dd7677c12c 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new f23fc71ea96 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 2972b0014ff 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] new 969ca7ab910 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 72b0dda5a60 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 200850bcfd1 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25 [...] new f69cc51acbf 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 5bbd8c8468a 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 4b46dca82a6 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/l [...] new 5afc5559b20 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits new f485b9f87fb 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 6bb694d55ea 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits new 71426ad54a9 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new ac993b00a39 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits new 6a4e7d0d23f 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 23 [...] new d78bc6206ff 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits new 943696df784 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-4846 [...] new 984379fd5a3 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gc [...] new d16648f6300 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 5f342a9c977 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 25a483f30c4 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 5ef81f22967 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 53654e06af7 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 7947913e385 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 60c42ed6669 108: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 48bc21f7d2e 109: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 98aae40bc4c 110: force: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] new 943abf5231a 111: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] new a8851669648 112: force: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] new deef95eaea1 113: onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 02bd4bd4e10 114: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new a0a58edadd4 115: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 78dd8207a5a 116: onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 2af525b728b 117: onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 330f6590640 onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new c49de2c8854 onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new c4890268bf7 onsuccess: #73: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 74ebd453afa onsuccess: #78: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 533935d401e onsuccess: #87: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 8cba351e496 onsuccess: #93: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 193b73d88c2 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new be53ae1c7bd onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 642286ecb1d onsuccess: #99: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new bdd442b6c7c onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] new 43baf5d9ea3 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] new fd234abffc5 onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (b8781675c2c) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 101 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2324 -> 2284 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2600 -> 2668 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27196 -> 29240 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz | Bin 17744 -> 18064 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 92552 -> 92660 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz | Bin 71736 -> 71764 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 368 -> 368 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 8568 -> 7836 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 232768 -> 234972 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/make-glibc.log.xz | Bin 185232 -> 185632 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 215524 -> 217924 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz | Bin 181308 -> 181248 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 96 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 94 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 8120 -> 8048 bytes 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 218 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 6208 -> 6468 bytes 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results.log | 436 +- git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- git/linux_rev | 2 +- jenkins/build-name | 2 +- jenkins/notify-full.log | 2308 +- jenkins/notify-init.log | 98 +- jenkins/rewrite.log | 24 +- jenkins/run-build.env | 6 +- manifest.sh | 4 +- notify/jira/comments.txt | 2 +- notify/mail-body.txt | 57 +- notify/mail-recipients.txt | 1 + notify/mail-subject.txt | 2 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 256 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 180 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 3327 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 758653 ++++++++++---------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 749180 +++++++++---------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 28632 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 64 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 184 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3426 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 743129 ++++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 745630 ++++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 28716 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 62 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-full.csv | 3484 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-internal.csv | 256 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results.csv | 256 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 152 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 256 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 4196 +- results_id | 2 +- 53 files changed, 1534569 insertions(+), 1538896 deletions(-)