This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-aarch64-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.

discards c763268488 101: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 41073cb1b5 100: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards e35858d43a 99: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 9315f07bc5 98: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 22d476d2f7 97: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards f934c30e9e 96: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards d5db84aa77 95: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 4a28daacd6 94: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 8363ee053c 93: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 409f96fc57 92: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 03e302598d 91: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards fd363fed3d 90: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards e8a4714843 89: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 96cd87ca96 88: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards ede8f3d2a8 87: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD speeds up by -5 [...] discards f91f754f2f 86: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards a9f2f22daf 85: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 1dc66a7d36 84: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 2bf31e8c82 83: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 9f32f6fc86 82: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 7fc4862701 81: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 133 commits discards 4a4ad7c560 80: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 1ebd1e65a0 79: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 7c61550090 78: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 34cf819d74 77: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards faa9f0b1bd 76: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards a7160e4dc7 75: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards d29a6851e8 74: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 676 commits discards 716e2e7d62 73: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 35 commits discards cd4c2cbed7 72: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 517 commits discards 2a3df7b4ec 71: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 [...] discards 7773ac25b6 70: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits discards 2b80f643fc 69: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits discards cb1ec723c6 68: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards af0722d62c 67: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1704 [...] discards a628f51cab 66: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run OK [...] discards 768d158975 65: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK af [...] discards 42eaebd40d 64: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 761a856cd9 63: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards 05cb8a91b8 62: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 10 [...] discards 1476c40b68 61: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards ea2e7f0b3c 60: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 3ff59b9f05 59: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 177693528d 58: onsuccess: #461: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 8a2b602674 57: onsuccess: #460: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 198 commits discards e98d39cbf1 56: force: #459: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray slowed down by 5% a [...] discards 2135c122b1 55: force: #457: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 58f3f2a5ce 54: force: #455: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 141 commits discards 18b5622c87 53: onsuccess: #454: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 617 [...] discards 5e2a7c3e5a 52: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 1dc7bd54cb 51: onsuccess: #443: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 58fb75d7b8 50: onsuccess: #441: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 014cb1df9a 49: onsuccess: #440: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 0eb2a98ad4 48: onsuccess: #439: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 4b12b314f9 47: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards e41bff422a 46: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards fb48443614 45: onsuccess: #436: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 231 commits discards f6caa02f41 44: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards bac6eba7e4 43: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 417 [...] discards 0a93efa444 42: force: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.7-149-gac [...] discards a75d723ee2 41: force: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD slowed down by 6% [...] discards eb77e81e5f 40: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 4 commits discards a34f5a336d 39: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 6ca2eb5e2c 38: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards a8e818c3dc 37: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD speeds up by [...] discards dacb06b65b 36: force: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] 454.calculix slowed down by 10 [...] discards 8579dbc54a 35: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 24 commits discards 4bf9c23c38 34: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 122 [...] discards 5b965a17c3 33: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD speeds up by [...] discards a213cd6568 32: onsuccess: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards b75b850c9b 31: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards fd0cd5d02a 30: onsuccess: #409: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 4b8be52529 29: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 84 commits discards e92e2fdac4 28: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits discards 061d512a88 27: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 184 commits discards d6511f0d80 26: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards bb114feef9 25: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp speeds up by - [...] discards 1592b84ed5 24: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD slowed down by 5% [...] discards 642831962d 23: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 216 commits discards 88b06cba30 22: onsuccess: #391: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 7ba271d056 21: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 28a734162b 20: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.11-3 [...] discards 23580b8a20 19: onsuccess: #386: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 17 commits discards 83acd905eb 18: onsuccess: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 78 commits discards 61eefcb92e 17: onsuccess: #384: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 56af9aecdd 16: onsuccess: #382: 1: [TCWG CI] 403.gcc built and run OK a [...] discards 0e66f673a3 15: onsuccess: #380: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 320a82d411 14: onsuccess: #378: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 20 commits discards eae73f4d89 13: force: #377: 1: [TCWG CI] 403.gcc failed to build after [...] discards 57750feabe 12: force: #376: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] discards e36ab16ffd 11: onsuccess: #375: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards f9d94a196d 10: onsuccess: #374: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards ba8be11154 9: onsuccess: #370: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 26701a5acc 8: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards dd828b9394 7: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by [...] discards b12ffdb84d 6: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] discards 24d46f8289 5: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] discards 7db439b1d3 4: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] discards 7e64fad327 3: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] discards 551437164b 2: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 discards 5b49b26af6 1: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 new 7a0a3faca9 1: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 new bdc7762d94 2: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 new f4357d5681 3: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] new f6e6cc3fc8 4: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] new e404742d68 5: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] new 99ec10ebd9 6: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] new 24c1939e89 7: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by [...] new c1ee85dc34 8: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e65ee1613f 9: onsuccess: #370: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 3493d4f8e1 10: onsuccess: #374: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 80f36df758 11: onsuccess: #375: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new d16e2bffbb 12: force: #376: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] new 9d8d0da1a1 13: force: #377: 1: [TCWG CI] 403.gcc failed to build after [...] new 575f32ef1f 14: onsuccess: #378: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 20 commits new c51834d9d6 15: onsuccess: #380: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 4ecb741a20 16: onsuccess: #382: 1: [TCWG CI] 403.gcc built and run OK a [...] new 555bda6380 17: onsuccess: #384: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 7c3b28781a 18: onsuccess: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 78 commits new 7e438c0bab 19: onsuccess: #386: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 17 commits new 73c739f117 20: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.11-3 [...] new 73f63480e2 21: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 2bbf531ff9 22: onsuccess: #391: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 86d611e3dd 23: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 216 commits new 0dacf49dac 24: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD slowed down by 5% [...] new 4245eee322 25: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp speeds up by - [...] new e25f7108f0 26: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 31ddd61543 27: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 184 commits new 31a4388990 28: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits new 408f825f6c 29: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 84 commits new c056f447c6 30: onsuccess: #409: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 693b8bb280 31: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 64867a1afa 32: onsuccess: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 5c74222d9f 33: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD speeds up by [...] new cf3f12760d 34: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 122 [...] new 62b0ed8abc 35: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 24 commits new 69fa1e276f 36: force: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] 454.calculix slowed down by 10 [...] new 3c49b8a5c2 37: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD speeds up by [...] new 370724a492 38: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 4994086fb8 39: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 078a3fadd2 40: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 4 commits new 8844490721 41: force: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD slowed down by 6% [...] new 80bc75a7df 42: force: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.7-149-gac [...] new 634c6ef85f 43: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 417 [...] new ff43c52d3d 44: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 21d4ffaf84 45: onsuccess: #436: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 231 commits new 4a479c2026 46: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 1521ebf813 47: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 02e0850c28 48: onsuccess: #439: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 94327f4081 49: onsuccess: #440: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 5ff841598e 50: onsuccess: #441: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new fe265884ac 51: onsuccess: #443: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 2cce9a01a6 52: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 351a4ec8f9 53: onsuccess: #454: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 617 [...] new 2a7811e1be 54: force: #455: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 141 commits new 1d097f8df8 55: force: #457: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 9c7a670653 56: force: #459: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray slowed down by 5% a [...] new 9428e76ca0 57: onsuccess: #460: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 198 commits new 191011c6ab 58: onsuccess: #461: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 4e2fb05a5f 59: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 699d73f8fc 60: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 8d8d4acba9 61: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 6f94c15441 62: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 10 [...] new 17c4a4638f 63: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new 9c256a2e32 64: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 7a9766111f 65: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK af [...] new 3f16cfa9c0 66: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run OK [...] new b26cb1c823 67: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1704 [...] new 0559178495 68: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 7acf943713 69: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits new d0a4613c39 70: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits new ea52ae83ca 71: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 [...] new 3add812bea 72: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 517 commits new 93ba1bf081 73: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 35 commits new fedfbbc2cf 74: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 676 commits new e6d53be533 75: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 50ba97504c 76: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new d28074f96f 77: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ce409fa0e2 78: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 152f227ecb 79: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 611b8b86a2 80: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 9d90b6cab7 81: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 133 commits new 8053522f3e 82: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 68756badbb 83: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 9e69869adf 84: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 9d7f8b31e1 85: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 4556d2c8b1 86: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new cf0a827fb1 87: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD speeds up by -5 [...] new 191eb6d1ba 88: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 95a08a8503 89: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 045c01e32b 90: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 1285fd19be 91: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 12815c3d4f 92: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new a277188825 93: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 5eb9863be2 94: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 8bcf5b0b42 95: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 945be0be34 96: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 98ef705915 97: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 2d073ba864 98: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new cb319b1c67 99: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new d0316bdc85 100: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new c88cf1a371 101: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new b91d174355 102: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (c763268488) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2188 -> 2208 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2448 -> 2464 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27860 -> 28152 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz | Bin 0 -> 18152 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 72284 -> 73304 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz | Bin 0 -> 53092 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 332 -> 364 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 8424 -> 7696 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 242652 -> 243992 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/make-glibc.log.xz | Bin 0 -> 194564 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 177064 -> 177772 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz | Bin 0 -> 144892 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 155 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 153 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4104 -> 4124 bytes 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 21 - 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 7176 -> 6908 bytes 11-update_baseline/console.log | 72 +- git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- git/linux_rev | 2 +- manifest.sh | 32 +- results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 76 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 44 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/results.csv | 681278 +++++++++---------- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/size.csv | 675816 +++++++++---------- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 44 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 44 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 171 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 670032 ++++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 676220 +++++++++---------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 20722 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 4180 +- results-vs-first/interesting-symbols.csv | 46 +- results-vs-first/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-first/results-full.csv | 185 +- results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 82 +- results-vs-first/results.csv | 82 +- results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3332 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 78 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 34 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 175 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 683893 +++++++++---------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 684153 +++++++++----------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 20172 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 4254 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 44 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 171 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 670032 ++++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 676220 +++++++++---------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 20722 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 4180 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 46 +- results-vs-prev/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/results-full.csv | 187 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 82 +- results-vs-prev/results.csv | 82 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3894 +- results_id | 2 +- 60 files changed, 2764086 insertions(+), 2737266 deletions(-) create mode 100644 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz create mode 100644 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz create mode 100644 07-build_abe-glibc/make-glibc.log.xz create mode 100644 08-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz