This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.

discards 76b251eab2 114: onsuccess: #75: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards dfc3347db5 113: onsuccess: #74: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards f8efe61381 112: onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 7ef2e95f4b 111: onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 015727f634 110: onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 68d0b1a54f 109: force: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 1dad3ec302 108: force: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 4267509c58 107: force: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards fc0cde9777 106: onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards da4b6e3bce 105: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 4220943646 104: force: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards aaba0009a0 103: force: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards fad7ea7368 102: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards ddbd7296df 101: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 389a6c7d0a 100: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 936a93e51d 99: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 821709f600 98: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 05c0e55022 97: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards c16279b2a6 96: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 136b5f9d17 95: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 72f2f98a73 94: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 63 commits discards 43ba63ae06 93: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] discards da270eb7ff 92: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 069047c81b 91: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] discards ff5637c5df 90: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 18afc9f239 89: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards feff9c3eed 88: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 7698554a73 87: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 0ae428eb14 86: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 106 commits discards 1eee63aeab 85: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 16% [...] discards 01d65a2b78 84: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -13% [...] discards e7b91e5d28 83: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 0a779e56a2 82: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards aabdb95aa0 81: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1696 [...] discards 5c7d042ed7 80: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards a271f4e5ce 79: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 9 [...] discards 742976ffb8 78: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 19% [...] discards f6f652bc64 77: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards e022bbf422 76: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 11% [...] discards 049d0ad0bd 75: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards 8d7aea131b 74: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] discards 0570991cde 73: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 7e949046cb 72: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 commits discards a9a9daa958 71: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits discards db01f851e6 70: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards 45535e134a 69: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards d89c8be1e2 68: force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 1d35cf79e8 67: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 678113a781 66: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 2442b96301 65: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards aa8270087f 64: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 7292142e4c 63: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 2099b6aeb9 62: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 341 commits discards 6fe5898075 61: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards b31c6fea50 60: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 9 commits discards d19ecb2aa9 59: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards 902e560c9e 58: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 78475f17e2 57: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 02a805d185 56: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 0104f021b6 55: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.9000 [...] discards 6e7d284a07 54: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] discards 5f522dbb49 53: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] discards 9c58747383 52: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards c29a1181eb 51: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] discards 174166001e 50: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards 21cb50fcbf 49: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] discards 36d9de12f4 48: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits discards 67938ff08c 47: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 54 commits discards cf3f6959e9 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] discards 5c1ada9281 45: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards b861cae9e8 44: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] discards e8c5560cca 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -7 [...] discards 772eea1ae5 42: onsuccess: #543: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36 [...] discards a270134b02 41: onsuccess: #541: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK a [...] discards 8874d055c3 40: force: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards c92121b501 39: onsuccess: #535: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards cec3fa2bc8 38: force: #524: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 77c83b73a1 37: force: #523: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray:[.] _ZN3pov17Check_ [...] discards 77c527777c 36: force: #522: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 77dbd89b72 35: onsuccess: #520: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 12df327cb7 34: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 3b417d8cb4 33: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 881e1e47fb 32: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 8487e1a99c 31: onsuccess: #512: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 86811e1358 30: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 86 commits discards 4d47e8b19d 29: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 16833dc175 28: onsuccess: #507: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards d43c42e67d 27: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 12206d9308 26: onsuccess: #505: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards d66003b66b 25: force: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards bd0cde9ac8 24: force: #503: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 71 commits discards 1f46f1f787 23: force: #501: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards e9183a2fa5 22: force: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref:[.] __memcpy_neon [...] discards 94b0e6c01f 21: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards e91007101a 20: onsuccess: #496: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 103 commits discards d5b964eed9 19: force: #495: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 slowed down by 4% [...] discards 6a728bf9b0 18: force: #494: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 96 commits discards 879ed526aa 17: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards c14b63e295 16: force: #489: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 61d5b9850f 15: onsuccess: #488: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 122 [...] discards 26fc2a0605 14: onsuccess: #487: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits new 7899edc710 14: onsuccess: #487: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits new 3d3c671c25 15: onsuccess: #488: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 122 [...] new 2dd847b561 16: force: #489: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 7531919a78 17: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 5441659e94 18: force: #494: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 96 commits new 61b9a0244a 19: force: #495: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 slowed down by 4% [...] new 16894fb14f 20: onsuccess: #496: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 103 commits new ac5983d975 21: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new cffc77d313 22: force: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref:[.] __memcpy_neon [...] new 181ae5e21d 23: force: #501: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new bc06bbb67d 24: force: #503: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 71 commits new 392caf9160 25: force: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new 25ce4afc7e 26: onsuccess: #505: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new eddbd485fe 27: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 513e8d4730 28: onsuccess: #507: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new b38329d928 29: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 2af39d9571 30: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 86 commits new df5cf5d76a 31: onsuccess: #512: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new f84fc0dd88 32: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 0fdf6656c8 33: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 690fdf910f 34: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 7fb251c6b4 35: onsuccess: #520: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 27ed19458c 36: force: #522: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new f03d4782d9 37: force: #523: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray:[.] _ZN3pov17Check_ [...] new d2a677d42d 38: force: #524: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 96b48eef1f 39: onsuccess: #535: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 278aec5170 40: force: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 4e97aae1ea 41: onsuccess: #541: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK a [...] new e90a8697b8 42: onsuccess: #543: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36 [...] new 1ac5efe8d9 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -7 [...] new 188d958902 44: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] new cfa866349b 45: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 5f5cdeead4 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] new 58635356e9 47: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 54 commits new 341b22f4ce 48: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits new 0a3d466ab0 49: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] new 9d6f4035f4 50: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new 8b45a7ad21 51: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] new c7eed59949 52: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new b4d9dd019b 53: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] new 453fabf3ce 54: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] new 10323591f9 55: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.9000 [...] new b6434c618a 56: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 1c613663a8 57: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 3a9f0af43a 58: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 1c8f78c0fa 59: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 539b0f9288 60: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 9 commits new 6680727b0b 61: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new d4b5302b59 62: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 341 commits new 7f868e3113 63: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new b1df6f35bd 64: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new a62a902ff8 65: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new a212eb6c26 66: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ead6858f43 67: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new dd62c59c58 68: force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new c1af4f59de 69: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new c2613fa00a 70: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new c439eedd54 71: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits new b1ac9e573d 72: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 commits new 1f5b5041a6 73: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 5d7bac3b8d 74: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] new bc46fea0c1 75: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new d31afa5933 76: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 11% [...] new 17f178e9b2 77: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 0e1d5a226a 78: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 19% [...] new 2ca6b6059a 79: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 9 [...] new 0134d1395c 80: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 06e7b4d1cc 81: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1696 [...] new c466c0f8e8 82: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new eaf9768372 83: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 7fb15fd2c8 84: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -13% [...] new c696d0bab6 85: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 16% [...] new 1cc318d410 86: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 106 commits new 2e781a04c9 87: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 39235d356c 88: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 32d17be759 89: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 5e01141b9b 90: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 0106e8261f 91: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] new ce182c0701 92: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 563bc47f3e 93: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] new e6c59c8102 94: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 63 commits new 8c7bdb1e30 95: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 93fc853050 96: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new f9579227e0 97: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new a5f673ac2b 98: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 873d19723a 99: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new ffb584b131 100: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 3112c7194a 101: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 74862da102 102: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new fc05a9dbd8 103: force: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 76ae155511 104: force: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 83ed598f79 105: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 5c126d6687 106: onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 3bad115d1b 107: force: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 2a8014fa62 108: force: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 5b6f667462 109: force: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 3cd653d65d 110: onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new fce86b4440 111: onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new a647d091c8 112: onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 6cf3b35dca 113: onsuccess: #74: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new c952924bc7 114: onsuccess: #75: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 94811c823c 115: onsuccess: #77: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (76b251eab2) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 1952 -> 2172 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2528 -> 2496 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27388 -> 28228 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz | Bin 17804 -> 18192 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 91048 -> 90800 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz | Bin 70108 -> 70100 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 7756 -> 7716 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 234956 -> 235664 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/make-glibc.log.xz | Bin 186032 -> 185928 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 212036 -> 213768 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz | Bin 178800 -> 178592 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 161 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 159 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4172 -> 4180 bytes 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 172 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 18176 -> 17404 bytes 10-check_regression/exe.improvement | 1 + 10-check_regression/extra-bisect-params | 2 +- .../output-bmk-results/exe.improvement | 1 + .../output-bmk-results/exe.improvement.diff | 4 + .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression | 1 - .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression.diff | 1 - .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement | 5 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression | 10 +- 10-check_regression/results-vs-first | 1 + 10-check_regression/results-vs-prev | 1 + 11-update_baseline/console.log | 42 +- git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- git/linux_rev | 2 +- manifest.sh | 26 +- notify/exe.improvement | 1 + results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 237 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 2 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/results.csv | 395518 ++++----- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/size.csv | 467820 +++++------ results-vs-first/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 3116 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3354 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 529524 ++++++------ results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 684458 ++++++++------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 30208 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 500 +- results-vs-first/interesting-symbols.csv | 157 +- results-vs-first/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-first/results-full.csv | 3144 +- results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 251 +- results-vs-first/results.csv | 251 +- results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3538 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 243 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 11 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 2682 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 3323 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 669368 ++++++++------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 780606 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 30434 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 998 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 3116 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3354 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 529524 ++++++------ results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 684458 ++++++++------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 30208 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 500 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 157 +- results-vs-prev/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/results-full.csv | 3420 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 253 +- results-vs-prev/results.csv | 253 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 4276 +- results_id | 2 +- 69 files changed, 2410198 insertions(+), 2459796 deletions(-) create mode 100644 10-check_regression/exe.improvement create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.improvement create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.improvement.diff delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.regression delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.regression.diff create mode 120000 10-check_regression/results-vs-first create mode 120000 10-check_regression/results-vs-prev create mode 100644 notify/exe.improvement