This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O3 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O3.

omits 2d54016 onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 43223bc onsuccess: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits e1e34e4 onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits 087f17b onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits a9446df onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits ba92415 69: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits f4935e4 68: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits 2c02431 67: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits de22e60 66: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] omits ebe15ee 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits 4167a50 64: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits 6945d95 63: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits c19bf12 62: force: #21: : [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bm [...] omits 1d095dd 61: force: #18: [.] strcmp [...] omits 3a1fab5 60: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] omits 26499d2 59: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] omits 40a8bb2 58: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] omits 648470b 57: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] omits 0258ceb 56: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] omits 2e29d37 55: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] omits f6fa922 54: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] omits 936bb63 53: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] omits 89f8940 52: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 293 commits omits 2ae2f29 51: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-17-init- [...] omits 7bca53c 50: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 61 commits omits 429bba8 49: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] omits 17f9f06 48: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] omits 248b509 47: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] omits 1b75205 46: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] omits f9bd409 45: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] omits 8b779aa 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 603 commits omits daffee3 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] omits 9e71404 42: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] omits 247ac32 41: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] omits 7018a04 40: onsuccess: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits d7c191e 39: onsuccess: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -7 [...] omits 0d54234 38: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 6d1bfaa 37: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 0107833 36: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits df76365 35: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 54dd0a9 34: onsuccess: #404: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 05d4514 33: onsuccess: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.9-4167 [...] omits f807b69 32: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...] omits d6702ed 31: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 78 commits omits 2c8a29f 30: onsuccess: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 [...] omits a0fe38f 29: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 958 commits omits d690fa2 28: onsuccess: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 98dbeb6 27: force: #393: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] omits bc9026e 26: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] omits 941e370 25: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 623 commits omits 23c7aa7 24: force: #386: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% a [...] omits 9d802f4 23: force: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 939 commits omits fcaccb3 22: onsuccess: #383: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 21f734b 21: force: #381: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] omits 2ab7de1 20: onsuccess: #379: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 3e7fd07 19: force: #377: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] omits 4694daf 18: onsuccess: #375: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits b672859 17: onsuccess: #370: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 090e7d1 16: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1752 [...] omits b677e74 15: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 179 commits omits ac6156f 14: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...] omits 2ffe0f6 13: onsuccess: #361: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits f6eabb9 12: onsuccess: #360: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 257 commits omits 31f2524 11: onsuccess: #359: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 200ee99 10: onsuccess: #357: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] omits 452efaa 9: onsuccess: #356: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -4% [...] omits 08ef17e 8: onsuccess: #355: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 31 commits omits 0088b62 7: force: #354: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% af [...] omits d4c68f7 6: force: #353: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 179 commits omits 6327f0c 5: onsuccess: #351: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer built and run OK a [...] omits 2f9de6d 4: onsuccess: #349: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 1565 commits omits 7a98585 3: force: #348: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray failed to build after [...] omits dd15473 2: force: #347: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng:[.] std_eval slowed do [...] omits c792104 1: onsuccess: #345: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] omits 1361599 0: init: #343: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: n [...] new 19400ce init: #343: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk_c [...] new ac971fd 1: onsuccess: #345: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 7a22241 2: force: #347: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng:[.] std_eval slowed do [...] new ce87198 3: force: #348: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray failed to build after [...] new 4aa7d8b 4: onsuccess: #349: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 1565 commits new ca8b5cf 5: onsuccess: #351: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer built and run OK a [...] new 5956455 6: force: #353: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 179 commits new 211f140 7: force: #354: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% af [...] new 7463946 8: onsuccess: #355: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 31 commits new 0d1270e 9: onsuccess: #356: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -4% [...] new 3a0d301 10: onsuccess: #357: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new bdf1c8b 11: onsuccess: #359: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 083b254 12: onsuccess: #360: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 257 commits new 2ba063d 13: onsuccess: #361: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 4d79ee6 14: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...] new 8f095a7 15: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 179 commits new 7f8146e 16: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1752 [...] new 5bd249b 17: onsuccess: #370: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 7140afb 18: onsuccess: #375: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 7133737 19: force: #377: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 833d717 20: onsuccess: #379: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new c5afca9 21: force: #381: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new cf85f10 22: onsuccess: #383: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 8acf19e 23: force: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 939 commits new 73eb4ea 24: force: #386: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% a [...] new d31b250 25: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 623 commits new 7acd982 26: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new 42f8f7c 27: force: #393: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new d1a8e57 28: onsuccess: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 3c80e42 29: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 958 commits new 36649e5 30: onsuccess: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 [...] new 01e3af5 31: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 78 commits new dff5ff5 32: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...] new 8db7441 33: onsuccess: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.9-4167 [...] new ff3ba27 34: onsuccess: #404: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 31d5604 35: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 9261b92 36: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 3313820 37: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ac7f863 38: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 26a090b 39: onsuccess: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -7 [...] new c447382 40: onsuccess: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 4cd08e3 41: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 876fd07 42: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new fbaedcb 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new b176714 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 603 commits new ee0ff34 45: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 7550fe7 46: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new d2e9f34 47: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new bad1c99 48: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 145bda1 49: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 7e17570 50: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 61 commits new 879a3e0 51: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-17-init- [...] new f84c955 52: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 293 commits new b660912 53: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 60bc420 54: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 525b303 55: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 6e090dd 56: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 7335f0b 57: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 379b0b9 58: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new c74d4bd 59: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new 360079a 60: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 9507daa 61: force: #18: [.] strcmp [...] new 4905f64 62: force: #21: : [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bm [...] new 23ff894 63: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 7c5341f 64: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 343db0e 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 83c196c 66: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 9072593 67: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 1e503d4 68: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 29bfb7e 69: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new a845478 onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 4250b58 onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new abb7d50 onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 64d3fdb onsuccess: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 756393d onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (2d54016) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/l [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 75 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: