This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO.

discards 4642c65e onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 99fc9570 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards e667e3d8 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 074efe4a onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards d82a12d1 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 9bd41d95 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 7b53ac69 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 65ed8a3e onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 894704d3 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards cadd96fc onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards baa4cb09 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards ac421d7a 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards c58fb487 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards a9c3c1fb 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 6da86229 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 4ec6035d 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards d2ff5abf 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards dee1a2dd 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards ee9f72be 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 56d3f2f6 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards e23b816f 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 0dc9baad 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 495e7021 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 3b7bcc92 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards a919100e 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] discards 5cb6f4f9 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] discards 25b3b3b4 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 496e7311 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] discards 473aaf3d 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards da50e948 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 2f5e34f8 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] discards 025c47b9 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards 13c066a1 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 5f10c7ab 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] discards be661392 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] discards 6f2ef94b 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards d4205582 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits discards 55fd8215 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] discards da370ad0 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] discards 509dd8ff 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits discards 0f2c0408 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards 337589fe 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards 3b95fc7f 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards e355489c 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards c1de9ba4 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 95b14cc0 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards a08b15c6 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] discards 05a4c12b 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 252dbf42 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] discards dae141df 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 9c012035 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] discards aee53617 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 702c8a9c 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards e1a3c9f6 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 8eedd8aa 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards bf51772f 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 0ced7b7b 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards d20e2632 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] discards e8d50b0f 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 27692e14 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards dea40d02 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] discards ebc2e65d 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 585a5cf4 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 99823716 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] discards 28307d8e 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] discards d790f6cc 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards 0ac51c95 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 072d6e8e 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] discards db419ba2 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards d9824e8d 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 57dc4713 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] discards b76a15e6 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits discards 647007ce 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards d60a0dd9 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits discards 2c640dad 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] discards 9d4dabee 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards db67b9de 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards fbfb80c3 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards bff0be32 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 6185a5f3 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 5713c098 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 79004eb9 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards e1d47919 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards ca74df45 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 5ed7a9ce 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 1a1c4fd8 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards eb315c24 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] discards b509e106 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards c42546e2 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits discards 3f09a86d 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] discards c1e3d6a6 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards fc7eb358 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits discards 2107b879 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards b7adf45f 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards b919f349 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] discards d6d8ae81 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits discards f1d72aab 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 46968975 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards e370ce20 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards d16a0ca3 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] discards 5fc73dcf 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards f6b7b664 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards b4ccdad0 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards db993a58 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 4684bc93 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] discards c0198729 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 4fdbf262 onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new e6a30389 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] new 24616597 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e9d46a93 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 13c226dd 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new d0680ea9 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 6f3864d8 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] new 53cf41d7 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 380a78c6 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 293df4f0 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 11b1f790 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits new e521d85a 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] new 9ac1fc9a 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new e34db235 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 6d0aabe8 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits new ec505de2 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new 928b46f1 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] new ccce4e21 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits new 1976e33e 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new 2bf358c9 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new b3f6fcbf 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 55d76e93 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 4ab0cc99 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new f797f868 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new a3eb8505 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new fe039bf7 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 6d260bdd 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 0b3dcacf 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 88dfe7a1 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new f43d315a 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 712a6373 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 55d535be 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] new da900aa3 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new 220f017c 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 0c7ca643 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits new 13457790 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new a9130fe5 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 78385bf3 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 77ac9ab8 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new fc22ac48 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 3429823d 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new 0e98cb91 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] new eec6bfd8 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] new 313a678c 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 41d70a78 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 978d07bd 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new 54571c53 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new ddb2f960 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new bfa3c957 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] new 027348d3 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new f246d836 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new fab9e9c7 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 47bb5b3a 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 74896fd9 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 6949ce7d 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 62e7f7d4 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] new 5256b927 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 49d31cc1 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new 92b5d392 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 5122ec21 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] new 45c8375e 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new de2b636d 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new d21cf101 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 301c8c1b 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 7da9abbb 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new b8753157 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new de4c96e2 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new 8487ae3b 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] new 175b2d3d 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] new 2ef14c80 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits new fa12fa63 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 7c502621 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new 56bfe53d 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] new d8897c6d 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 896cb0fa 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new ac751d2c 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new 731d4825 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] new 32ff82b1 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new 4794446f 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new d29ba14a 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new ef5267b7 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new 7e93ddbe 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new b72a0cad 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 036f043a 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 917096c8 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new a0e4fae5 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new d10f1345 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new cadb3ac9 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new d83f1fe3 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new bf559cd2 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new d878a5cc 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new a3aeef7d 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new ef18874c 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 29f27231 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 6112f66b 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new e054b276 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 989a72ac onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 04650575 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 985e779c onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 39bfade1 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new ed3d5b9f onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 1f0a122c onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 45975adc onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 39bcca09 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new ab024f5b onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new cc1d5f79 onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (4642c65e) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 106 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: