This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-aarch64-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.

discards 0262e90d74 106: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 13a998d29e 105: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards ed5901d074 104: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 60479aaa53 103: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 25540741aa 102: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 1e3ead67bc 101: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 2828b82f41 100: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 67b340f878 99: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 5e0c09c340 98: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 40278fbb26 97: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 2b6219d5c1 96: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards e2eacd2af3 95: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards da82df2e93 94: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 4e4ac0b3c0 93: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 213a79f380 92: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards a021b88aec 91: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 99fb4324e3 90: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards e29da39f18 89: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 47f5b45b1f 88: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards ecc5c12803 87: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD speeds up by -5 [...] discards 8242437e08 86: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 8d0b1e6810 85: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 89ec51dcaf 84: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 267852049d 83: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 5e5a1ca582 82: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards d6d355fcde 81: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 133 commits discards f2e61a9fa4 80: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 6b7016ba5e 79: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 2e8f20610f 78: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 3431e4d99a 77: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 9d0ba1a304 76: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 161ef48311 75: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards c51e9b64c5 74: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 676 commits discards 14c18ca2b1 73: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 35 commits discards 20dae44419 72: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 517 commits discards 6a58d94716 71: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 [...] discards daf211ac5a 70: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits discards 0b3033f4d2 69: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits discards ccfa65c845 68: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards b28fc310aa 67: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1704 [...] discards a5d396ff43 66: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run OK [...] discards 342d4eb9da 65: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK af [...] discards 414f34cec4 64: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 318022d545 63: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards 4b69f7d168 62: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 10 [...] discards 2dce60b0e6 61: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 2e9d2cb6f0 60: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 734cae1911 59: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 5a282af402 58: onsuccess: #461: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 2fd8221b46 57: onsuccess: #460: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 198 commits discards 80219c1fe3 56: force: #459: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray slowed down by 5% a [...] discards 539a6b24cd 55: force: #457: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 95ca300f31 54: force: #455: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 141 commits discards 4536d87c70 53: onsuccess: #454: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 617 [...] discards 8217c05593 52: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards ce77bdae28 51: onsuccess: #443: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 1f4109be90 50: onsuccess: #441: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 654e84e20f 49: onsuccess: #440: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 5c5fd19b98 48: onsuccess: #439: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 0b6ce78ccb 47: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards d07fc53f40 46: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards ccf85821e8 45: onsuccess: #436: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 231 commits discards b52fa009be 44: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards d4780ca0fe 43: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 417 [...] discards 38348e950b 42: force: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.7-149-gac [...] discards c4d9e3b0cc 41: force: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD slowed down by 6% [...] discards 1ff23971c1 40: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 4 commits discards 0f07003c2c 39: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 9644a6e794 38: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 97aaea8a81 37: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD speeds up by [...] discards d98893af15 36: force: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] 454.calculix slowed down by 10 [...] discards 0fcfd66531 35: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 24 commits discards 4a2f7a5846 34: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 122 [...] discards d4f3318753 33: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD speeds up by [...] discards 127ac60d94 32: onsuccess: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 9c163b71fb 31: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 669a71ef0a 30: onsuccess: #409: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 19ac7fbf34 29: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 84 commits discards 8c09acc9fc 28: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits discards f14beb0863 27: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 184 commits discards af84ba07fd 26: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 0751c6a652 25: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp speeds up by - [...] discards e8739627a2 24: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD slowed down by 5% [...] discards 51b342ace7 23: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 216 commits discards 03aaafb49d 22: onsuccess: #391: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 2076f01ea0 21: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 92bb3ba62f 20: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.11-3 [...] discards eb94b61161 19: onsuccess: #386: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 17 commits discards 7122cb4d3e 18: onsuccess: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 78 commits discards 446b69ebf5 17: onsuccess: #384: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 534b95e74e 16: onsuccess: #382: 1: [TCWG CI] 403.gcc built and run OK a [...] discards b287ce03a9 15: onsuccess: #380: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards d1ab7ba574 14: onsuccess: #378: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 20 commits discards 14041c5c97 13: force: #377: 1: [TCWG CI] 403.gcc failed to build after [...] discards 2503f20286 12: force: #376: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] discards 38c2679ab1 11: onsuccess: #375: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 666963ce08 10: onsuccess: #374: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 72919dc323 9: onsuccess: #370: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 0a642565c1 8: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards a24a0ad771 7: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by [...] discards b9af3825e9 6: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] new 9d23900bac 6: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] new b73712dbd7 7: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by [...] new 35d828946b 8: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new d5d0461b75 9: onsuccess: #370: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 143d4df68b 10: onsuccess: #374: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 964c1a406a 11: onsuccess: #375: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 29a0d8e4bf 12: force: #376: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] new e29378bf19 13: force: #377: 1: [TCWG CI] 403.gcc failed to build after [...] new d31112e9c6 14: onsuccess: #378: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 20 commits new cbd2d19e55 15: onsuccess: #380: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 40fec57ea9 16: onsuccess: #382: 1: [TCWG CI] 403.gcc built and run OK a [...] new 7ef1c9d99e 17: onsuccess: #384: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 9f968e1351 18: onsuccess: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 78 commits new c4c9b1f189 19: onsuccess: #386: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 17 commits new c0308987c1 20: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.11-3 [...] new 561d488c88 21: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 1da8d34456 22: onsuccess: #391: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new ed29205669 23: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 216 commits new c377275608 24: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD slowed down by 5% [...] new ff05160a3e 25: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp speeds up by - [...] new 43cef4dc2b 26: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 76e1114e80 27: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 184 commits new 7157116925 28: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits new 5f3ab612fb 29: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 84 commits new 7d37b74f01 30: onsuccess: #409: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new fdf7546003 31: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new c7c25b9ae8 32: onsuccess: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 661bf2a972 33: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD speeds up by [...] new 5050395dba 34: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 122 [...] new 88ca5369d3 35: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 24 commits new 907213b6e5 36: force: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] 454.calculix slowed down by 10 [...] new 3733ffc279 37: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD speeds up by [...] new 9ecf5a149d 38: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 0e7d9a5f5e 39: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 8d7fb28a97 40: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 4 commits new 3d7ad53539 41: force: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD slowed down by 6% [...] new dbf8e4890d 42: force: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.7-149-gac [...] new fdfc27b7f3 43: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 417 [...] new 4259081fc7 44: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 01177dd2f3 45: onsuccess: #436: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 231 commits new a34b9d9764 46: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 499268f80a 47: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 94c5a9b51b 48: onsuccess: #439: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 70da3ed54d 49: onsuccess: #440: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 36dc27cd0d 50: onsuccess: #441: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new c98365a48a 51: onsuccess: #443: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 0101dfe4f6 52: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 330cace29c 53: onsuccess: #454: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 617 [...] new 3e7752214e 54: force: #455: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 141 commits new 953fa3e14f 55: force: #457: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new dbcbdcdfa7 56: force: #459: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray slowed down by 5% a [...] new daa7aaf16b 57: onsuccess: #460: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 198 commits new 3e3ff562b9 58: onsuccess: #461: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 64e7eacc06 59: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 8b2b59d948 60: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new d327c5eec7 61: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new ed7cd6f758 62: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 10 [...] new b6bc7a5aa3 63: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new 6e3be5c9be 64: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 9b6b887814 65: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK af [...] new 99f008d9f7 66: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run OK [...] new 8203181a39 67: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1704 [...] new f55bafcd47 68: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new e72520d2ce 69: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits new 9dd1da9534 70: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits new 4ca3c9b979 71: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 [...] new e73689e74e 72: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 517 commits new 8995ab4c6f 73: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 35 commits new d99e581de2 74: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 676 commits new 48562e214f 75: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 1e88fb2238 76: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 42843cbd0b 77: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 3e97900bbc 78: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new bf0cf39401 79: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 60b6d3032c 80: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new ede6983c61 81: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 133 commits new 2fc66c6468 82: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 268496ebe7 83: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 5e314857a6 84: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new c6524d6fa2 85: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 1dc85502fa 86: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 27fdb0a0f6 87: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD speeds up by -5 [...] new 269cee290c 88: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 7e2c61b302 89: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 570088814b 90: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new f2e7995c69 91: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new b180b76dc4 92: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new c60ef7aeb6 93: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 1f174d4424 94: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new ed247d2bb1 95: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 682a8e136d 96: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 26ee07a12f 97: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 494af3333b 98: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 1ab3cecffd 99: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 96352fb5fb 100: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 3a73d92c4f 101: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 46fff40c01 102: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new f48ab18060 103: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new baba1cd8a2 104: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new ed2607a314 105: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 380a29d802 106: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new c12016cfd2 107: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (0262e90d74) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2376 -> 2380 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2616 -> 2636 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27684 -> 28104 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz | Bin 18112 -> 18000 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 72264 -> 73216 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz | Bin 52940 -> 52828 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 364 -> 364 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 8572 -> 8760 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 242364 -> 244392 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/make-glibc.log.xz | Bin 194428 -> 194620 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 177124 -> 179392 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz | Bin 146468 -> 147040 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 198 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 196 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4188 -> 4124 bytes 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 7000 -> 7776 bytes 10-check_regression/exe.improvement | 1 + 10-check_regression/extra-bisect-params | 2 +- .../output-bmk-results/diff-bmk-results.out | 5 + .../output-bmk-results/exe.improvement | 1 + .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression | 1 + .../{diff-bmk-results.out => exe.regression.diff} | 0 11-update_baseline/console.log | 70 +- git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- git/linux_rev | 2 +- manifest.sh | 32 +- notify/exe.improvement | 1 + results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 86 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 32 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 166 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 63662 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 642772 ++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 18152 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 1498 +- results-vs-first/csvs2table-results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-first/csvs2table-results-full.csv | 180 +- results-vs-first/csvs2table-results-internal.csv | 82 +- results-vs-first/csvs2table-results.csv | 82 +- results-vs-first/interesting-symbols.csv | 30 +- results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 82 +- results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3398 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 88 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 2 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 40 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 164 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 61415 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 673123 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 19834 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 3668 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 32 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 166 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 63662 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 642772 ++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 18152 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 1498 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-full.csv | 184 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-internal.csv | 82 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results.csv | 82 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 30 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 82 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 4254 +- results_id | 2 +- 65 files changed, 1025533 insertions(+), 1194672 deletions(-) create mode 100644 10-check_regression/exe.improvement create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.improvement create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.regression copy 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/{diff-bmk-results.out => exe.regressio [...] create mode 100644 notify/exe.improvement