This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O2 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.

discards 77c5d31c8d 114: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 5a0c276cde 113: onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 4649ec3d19 112: force: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards e14f0ce107 111: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 30207064d1 110: force: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards f135969c51 109: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards bfdb49c64a 108: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards a8de093b3a 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 48274c03df 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 71f66773bb 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 545c7b9abc 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 95e498c247 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards c4ac612858 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 8c4570b2a8 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] discards d666d021e9 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-48462 [...] discards 2d5fc5654a 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits discards bfa18b64fc 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 231 [...] discards f79846b889 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits discards 81bc3db360 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards f0993b8799 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits discards 0a09de5ecc 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards aa9670732b 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits discards fedee4cd9b 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] discards f3d88bfcc4 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 8e3210de7f 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 263283f7f8 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] discards 197c316685 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 9388d2fa50 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards a7885924b9 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] discards 0582ed683a 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards c6140f4059 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 2f73f0d8b5 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 53f41130c8 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% a [...] discards 3e6de12e4f 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] discards b9403f2594 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-4559 [...] discards 44d1553e27 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] discards f92154f2f8 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 5414f387cb 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 72ac8089fe 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 3b1ec4b9ac 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 commits discards c7b365d77a 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards b8e9b6783b 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits discards 10b3f3907a 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_step [...] discards e890cf1a83 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] discards 9f8a75cdbf 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards fc86662372 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 400b2f7f06 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 279c42cc05 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards 0543f80f65 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards 1db80a7729 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 [...] discards 63c9e8c3f8 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slow [...] discards cebf33e88c 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] discards 8dc5a6aec3 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards 5b4750bcd5 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchpo [...] discards 51c5393986 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards 3d6621ddbd 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 3d37b9d90b 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards 9532c2eab3 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 6450 [...] discards 7522e9bb2e 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK a [...] discards 0e0ad72f61 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] discards 7ad815bf1a 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards ec0abeb7a9 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards b90960d33f 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bi [...] discards 21dbe12eda 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 26695e368f 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 176528d636 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 56b932c6f4 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards c3750252f2 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 375068919c 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards 0c048604f8 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards a39b1bda4f 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] discards 2ca88134d9 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 9e6b140c11 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards d4f428617b 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] discards f0f51dac39 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 9cdffbf453 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] discards 0f2e424a57 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits discards 7333412ef6 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards a3877b2946 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards b0ffbc632d 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run [...] discards c70c1a8b8b 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] discards 253d23736b 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards c57c02a42f 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] discards 020b606740 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 21 [...] discards c1e7caed75 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 4b2818b07d 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] discards 6533975c6d 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 31b14d02d9 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 2477660782 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 993b46a0fd 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits discards 59984503bd 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards c6a26de898 23: onsuccess: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 3fbce31ac7 22: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards f35e3d8c39 21: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 12 commits discards 7d6eba1f6b 20: force: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards d7a93cbac3 19: force: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 18 [...] discards 05047e1d1a 18: onsuccess: #413: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 5cfb0634e0 17: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits discards ed5fe30a2c 16: onsuccess: #410: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 2cbdd78658 15: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 35 commits discards c12d8a901b 14: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 208 commits new f352dbd186 14: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 208 commits new d3ca61c108 15: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 35 commits new 97872a55c2 16: onsuccess: #410: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new ed292c188a 17: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits new 78a373a26b 18: onsuccess: #413: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new fe1227517e 19: force: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 18 [...] new 64281de9e4 20: force: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new 837765a060 21: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 12 commits new 8abdc7264c 22: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 26fda1f32e 23: onsuccess: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new ea62d5fa9f 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new a8961ff790 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits new 4575b284cd 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 5e8afbc488 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 88f4be130a 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 3a80ab176a 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] new 8579a7e873 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 4fd72ce869 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 21 [...] new 5a1326be5b 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] new 4665dc7d4f 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 36d66d5edf 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] new 5749885580 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run [...] new 53fde7a069 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new c1d56942d6 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new 4383ffa8fc 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits new b4efe64927 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] new 4a4d35aaa4 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 0167feba57 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] new a492231115 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 07fe1f96bb 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 935f92a4cc 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] new e2735f5aa0 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 5be6f8314f 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new c276b39d2d 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 3426f47dcd 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new 0675711dea 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 4fe5e9aa25 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ca88ce36ca 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 38d243e559 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bi [...] new 49ce58d2cf 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new b5d03b90e9 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 3706eb2ce2 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] new 51e58965af 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK a [...] new 14cedb2a7d 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 6450 [...] new b4ed5e68c2 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new e34dc02595 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 4d0307f12c 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new c957eb2ed2 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchpo [...] new 827f06cda4 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new 884afab68d 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] new a76f7102a6 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slow [...] new 8d2a2b0f36 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 [...] new 47ff350420 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new 83fd52a2d9 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new 33283c7483 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 0372d50db3 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new c9f9d90d56 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 1cffa4b956 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] new 7d76260e13 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_step [...] new 5d84af3347 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits new 90bf78c69d 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new e950acb920 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 commits new e512a63c87 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 452479b9cd 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new fde9913e1e 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 597cbfeca5 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] new 8e07b31d55 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-4559 [...] new fe186d6494 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] new 1551701f25 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% a [...] new ecfabd8f3e 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 597af15aa1 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 714c27ed58 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new f46a378924 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] new c7a9c75a69 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new b751694240 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new ebe195ab45 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] new fa56dcdbd3 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 11028a265c 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b3974c6f4f 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] new e6a91971b2 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits new 58041efbe8 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 27388074a0 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits new 92a94f8c80 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new c301c0669a 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits new 884525cc9e 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 231 [...] new 9a5b3a0c8e 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits new b8857b7b04 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-48462 [...] new 70abded69e 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] new 2ca5c129f4 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new e50c9a693c 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new add8c3eb19 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 1f80f33e33 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new fc5c7ab527 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 969b61a068 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 2acf1a4f88 108: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 7c9cf9c8de 109: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 762dbab0d5 110: force: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 4a8667b4a2 111: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 299763f352 112: force: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new b4205b8e82 113: onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 0faf8fedc2 114: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 96e9fbea7e 115: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (77c5d31c8d) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2188 -> 2160 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2452 -> 2432 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27164 -> 27108 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz | Bin 17688 -> 17740 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 90992 -> 90496 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz | Bin 70108 -> 70096 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 8452 -> 8476 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 233428 -> 233592 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/make-glibc.log.xz | Bin 185636 -> 185584 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 212640 -> 211700 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz | Bin 179888 -> 179800 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 175 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 173 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4136 -> 4164 bytes 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 189 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 18456 -> 20056 bytes .../output-bmk-results/exe.improvement | 3 +- .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression | 1 + .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression.diff | 1 + .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement | 5 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression | 4 + .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression.diff | 1 + 10-check_regression/results-vs-first | 1 + 10-check_regression/results-vs-prev | 1 + 11-update_baseline/console.log | 70 +- git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- manifest.sh | 28 +- results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 233 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 3111 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3355 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 76677 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 602290 +++++++-------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 20484 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 52 +- results-vs-first/interesting-symbols.csv | 147 +- results-vs-first/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-first/results-full.csv | 3391 +- results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 247 +- results-vs-first/results.csv | 247 +- results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3398 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 243 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 17 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 2633 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 3362 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 66008 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 693195 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 27608 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 38 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 3111 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3355 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 76677 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 602290 +++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 20484 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 52 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 147 +- results-vs-prev/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/results-full.csv | 3515 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 253 +- results-vs-prev/results.csv | 253 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3964 +- results_id | 2 +- 63 files changed, 1122753 insertions(+), 1098880 deletions(-) create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.regression create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.regression.diff create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/symbol.regression create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/symbol.regression.diff create mode 120000 10-check_regression/results-vs-first create mode 120000 10-check_regression/results-vs-prev