This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_size-spec2k6/gnu-aarch64-master-Os_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.
discards 88fb4cb617 onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards ed3dc570c4 115: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards fda4e89528 114: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 563fb49424 113: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards f322dd01c5 112: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 3918f28e20 111: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 97c3092002 110: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards c48bdf0089 109: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 1d557f4a28 108: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 812d528d48 107: onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 39878060d2 106: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards fc46fb2952 105: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 54e9eb4222 104: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 30600116dd 103: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards ea14862c4d 102: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 2b20d2f542 101: force: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards a9e43060c0 100: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards db78ee4f38 99: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 6b5e078b8f 98: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 0286efee1c 97: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 3d4d03d997 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 6e186745e3 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards b52d76ed46 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 23 commits discards 96adf2e038 93: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after basepoints/gcc-13 [...] discards 252f9f0d21 92: force: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 148 commits discards 5861db4cba 91: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/linu [...] discards 58358a7585 90: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 3c5c1e59de 89: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.2.8-4846 [...] discards 53fe0f8d74 88: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards 69c9fd4351 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 9302685768 86: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 5 commits discards d0851fa243 85: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2% [...] discards f9125903cd 84: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 41 commits discards f4cea96382 83: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] discards 1508da5139 82: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 3178c472ed 81: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 8e0d8fa57e 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 191525919f 79: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards ffc984ce40 78: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards c1328dfed7 77: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards e1c32819dd 76: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards e93c6933b3 75: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards f99612e302 74: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards d3f9a2c5b9 73: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 584d99cfe4 72: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards c9375994f7 71: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards d944c973c8 70: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards ac85df4cf6 69: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards e6506dca32 68: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards ebaed4fcf8 67: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 26d523de96 66: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards faba61bd49 65: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards b22c19ce81 64: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 2e107997cf 63: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards a9b83b4f9c 62: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng reduced in size by [...] discards 570f00ce4a 61: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 6df4994bd4 60: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 1e8421a319 59: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards f1c996ee82 58: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards bd5edb235c 57: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 75d89565e4 56: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 8765db33aa 55: onsuccess: #366: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 949 commits discards 52f264eda8 54: force: #365: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng grew in size by 4% a [...] discards cbffa2cb8a 53: force: #364: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 19 commits discards 1d34c3ff0e 52: onsuccess: #363: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 112 [...] discards bed624c65e 51: onsuccess: #362: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 62 commits discards 0e731008a0 50: onsuccess: #347: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 7e2c4b15c5 49: onsuccess: #344: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 34 commits discards 9db782b934 48: onsuccess: #342: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards fbb1d93065 47: onsuccess: #332: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards fdf1c8bdef 46: onsuccess: #330: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-416 [...] discards ed17cc96b3 45: onsuccess: #328: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 49b80a4b5f 44: onsuccess: #326: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards e144b6079b 43: onsuccess: #325: 1: [TCWG CI] 450.soplex reduced in size [...] discards 28eb8df28a 42: onsuccess: #324: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD reduced in si [...] discards e847e44615 41: force: #323: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2 [...] discards e3a048ab95 40: onsuccess: #321: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards b70918ac63 39: onsuccess: #319: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 26a574f603 38: onsuccess: #317: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards f94e77a50b 37: onsuccess: #316: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 972803142f 36: onsuccess: #313: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 887d7020c0 35: onsuccess: #312: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards f2a87e9284 34: onsuccess: #311: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards a188fc6338 33: onsuccess: #310: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 5195cf7788 32: onsuccess: #308: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 212a0b4286 31: onsuccess: #307: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards bba1491bf2 30: onsuccess: #306: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD reduced in si [...] discards da9a3605c2 29: onsuccess: #305: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 09bea119e8 28: onsuccess: #304: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 13 commits discards d182840e1b 27: force: #303: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2 [...] discards 224444d547 26: force: #302: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 104 commits discards 2171422a16 25: onsuccess: #301: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.9-39 [...] discards 1c63b8a6e2 24: onsuccess: #300: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits discards 5086781f3f 23: onsuccess: #298: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 41a744c6f0 22: onsuccess: #295: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 3761cf92ea 21: onsuccess: #294: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 252 commits discards 2a531b7a08 20: force: #293: 1: [TCWG CI] 450.soplex grew in size by 2% [...] discards b6b4c73741 19: force: #292: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 27 commits discards 1079ef1634 18: onsuccess: #291: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.7-39 [...] discards 6a23ab1192 17: onsuccess: #290: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 9 commits new d3852602a0 17: onsuccess: #290: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 9 commits new 7e4a8cd5f6 18: onsuccess: #291: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.7-39 [...] new 742a2522d8 19: force: #292: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 27 commits new 7c1ca735ab 20: force: #293: 1: [TCWG CI] 450.soplex grew in size by 2% [...] new 2be18c77b8 21: onsuccess: #294: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 252 commits new 9b07095579 22: onsuccess: #295: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new c6c4432d7d 23: onsuccess: #298: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new cc79f1f540 24: onsuccess: #300: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits new bf32046541 25: onsuccess: #301: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.9-39 [...] new fadb46e3b2 26: force: #302: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 104 commits new e67c12e0bf 27: force: #303: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2 [...] new 16ea96828c 28: onsuccess: #304: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 13 commits new 95042bdb00 29: onsuccess: #305: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 7f2854e128 30: onsuccess: #306: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD reduced in si [...] new e09f198ad4 31: onsuccess: #307: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 1c91f70c59 32: onsuccess: #308: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 85e659e78c 33: onsuccess: #310: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new d9f7ebb686 34: onsuccess: #311: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 19be96b714 35: onsuccess: #312: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 77066b2e3e 36: onsuccess: #313: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new db90b85159 37: onsuccess: #316: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new f35d0363aa 38: onsuccess: #317: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new e2137de2bd 39: onsuccess: #319: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 604a9ce5b3 40: onsuccess: #321: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 39b68d2edd 41: force: #323: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2 [...] new 140b2a5d16 42: onsuccess: #324: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD reduced in si [...] new 7d45ab6ed0 43: onsuccess: #325: 1: [TCWG CI] 450.soplex reduced in size [...] new 85c575ab5d 44: onsuccess: #326: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 3d40a3c3cd 45: onsuccess: #328: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new ecc65095f9 46: onsuccess: #330: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-416 [...] new faa9af446e 47: onsuccess: #332: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 2d0c81da64 48: onsuccess: #342: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 24c0902033 49: onsuccess: #344: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 34 commits new 083b5c30eb 50: onsuccess: #347: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new d0fd103dde 51: onsuccess: #362: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 62 commits new d1b0aab335 52: onsuccess: #363: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 112 [...] new 8e465e599d 53: force: #364: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 19 commits new 857828a09a 54: force: #365: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng grew in size by 4% a [...] new a887a214ff 55: onsuccess: #366: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 949 commits new db808140b5 56: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 55f310bc30 57: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 91cf6614da 58: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new e867e33dc5 59: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new ac00997a35 60: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 0c93543dca 61: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new dca27d59f8 62: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng reduced in size by [...] new 912abfd432 63: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 2258d1afdf 64: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new a4a80ff543 65: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 3cfc2b7032 66: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 26f5a41356 67: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new ebec395da0 68: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 4390cf2394 69: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new e833aaaaa0 70: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 700052f09e 71: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new a40d94eb36 72: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new fe66f1f251 73: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 63e8695125 74: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e489007587 75: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new b8012941c1 76: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 4ef65673ab 77: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new b296d75ca8 78: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 9a62d686a9 79: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 1b7471bed3 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 876c65cc21 81: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 5fc3e4a5de 82: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new bf4d06cf0d 83: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] new fb5b81434f 84: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 41 commits new 5a0eeb0c67 85: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2% [...] new aa8b84d20f 86: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 5 commits new ff47f80ea7 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 621ba39b71 88: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 796c574a16 89: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.2.8-4846 [...] new 647ff6a262 90: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new b6fe677d7b 91: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/linu [...] new 37fb2bf39c 92: force: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 148 commits new 3489d9edba 93: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after basepoints/gcc-13 [...] new 6b377108c6 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 23 commits new 83aee90a59 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 1a54ec56f4 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 8674e490ab 97: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 5f22be9e05 98: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new d59d48f16a 99: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 25c7db4fcf 100: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 691d175960 101: force: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 28c581a80f 102: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 55cf66b7c1 103: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 54125ce357 104: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 691974508e 105: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 951559d6a8 106: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 6172907b34 107: onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new f328b3e2d4 108: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 1e435b56d2 109: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new f09443ab03 110: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 50cf871ab7 111: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 5dec4d0c0b 112: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 96e78aa10f 113: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 2fe45f2bd7 114: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 0dfd8ef5c7 115: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new e1c6dbaa54 onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new b0e55d298f onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (88fb4cb617) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_size-spec2k6/gn [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 101 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2424 -> 2368 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2632 -> 2676 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27844 -> 28748 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz | Bin 17980 -> 18316 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 74972 -> 74444 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz | Bin 52968 -> 52980 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 364 -> 364 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 8852 -> 7924 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 244052 -> 244756 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/make-glibc.log.xz | Bin 194464 -> 194700 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 179548 -> 184508 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz | Bin 146460 -> 148624 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 104 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 102 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4044 -> 4020 bytes 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 7896 -> 7776 bytes .../output-bmk-results/diff-bmk-results.out | 5 +- .../output-bmk-results/exe.improvement | 2 +- .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression | 1 + .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression.diff | 0 .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression | 5 +- git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- jenkins/build-name | 2 +- manifest.sh | 28 +- results-vs-prev/cmp-results.diff | 48 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 86 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 5 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 42 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 150 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 928638 +++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 931272 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 42 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 36 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 42 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 145 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 928520 ++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 931226 ++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 42 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 36 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-brief.csv | 72 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-full.csv | 169 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-internal.csv | 79 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results.csv | 79 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 1 + results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 79 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3206 +- results_id | 2 +- 49 files changed, 1862122 insertions(+), 1862150 deletions(-) create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.regression rename results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-internal.csv.diff => 10-check_regression [...]