This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O2 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.

discards 576822624b 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards da44dab7f8 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 5a23c8f819 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 648957f7ee 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 1167e3cd86 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 3ea0641cc7 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] discards fdd2090fb8 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-48462 [...] discards 08c4785583 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits discards cd420fdd4e 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 231 [...] discards 0602f22ed3 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits discards 3698b3c82c 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 572ea97ec0 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits discards c98f6398f2 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 36eaa52956 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits discards d296e77d4d 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] discards 77d5b138e1 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards c190da0f7d 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 4873e67e28 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] discards aeda11dd3d 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 137b75d3e1 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 53f33f22f7 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] discards 644c00ab96 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 263fc054e7 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards cc30d5821b 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 958c634434 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% a [...] discards 778fd45368 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] discards 960297c001 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-4559 [...] discards b9d9ee112d 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] discards 8588bf9c3c 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 5dcd522e5e 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 4cbba32308 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards f5a91570cb 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 commits discards 96a0a7e86f 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards f55c4254bc 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits discards 65bf5248e9 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_step [...] discards 49dae9f551 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] discards 6f8f2b67a8 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards fc5501dd1a 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards c69b3eada3 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards c923169c7e 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards 9c77126b17 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards 7a57a9402c 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 [...] discards ca0110d04a 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slow [...] discards 4dd8d9cf91 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] discards 56b2f6f3c9 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards 49e412c572 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchpo [...] discards 95946ecff4 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards 0764203cdd 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 977ff544ce 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards 0acf591115 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 6450 [...] discards 3a8c0af86c 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK a [...] discards 24150239f3 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] discards f53ca1c7f3 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards a51bc82be5 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards 5e1c4cc8e1 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bi [...] discards c721c9926d 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards a3be764758 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 45f1225f36 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards a68432c1b9 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards 37e8af415f 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 20f79935a7 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards ab62669740 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards 7743e77588 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] discards 01c97d0612 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 4a14c1abfa 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 3932d71aa3 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] discards 4ead472327 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 39cb4c0398 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] discards aef7d40a48 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits discards 456ad9e37c 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards c5818ffa1e 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 09f220c676 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run [...] discards 101cb8d3e1 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] discards 2b703d2646 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 073ba8401a 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] discards ca4121cb6e 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 21 [...] discards df6d232abe 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards c9e792b900 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] discards 4dcbadb5f2 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 4e93e2621a 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 094ef15d3a 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 11e1a6a7ee 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits discards ecabf6cea2 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 644e9a52ed 23: onsuccess: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 49ee3841cd 22: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 9d5206efdb 21: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 12 commits discards 50f1aebfd1 20: force: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards a310b253ad 19: force: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 18 [...] discards a590ec475e 18: onsuccess: #413: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 681cbab3b3 17: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits discards ebeed05ec8 16: onsuccess: #410: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 313fc761ef 15: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 35 commits discards 5e04f18b74 14: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 208 commits discards 7a67b4858c 13: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 64c2518ba1 12: force: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards b16fd1e7fd 11: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline b [...] discards bd961bba19 10: force: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp:[.] _ZN5cGate7deli [...] discards 727bed10d3 9: force: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 39bda83faf 8: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 37b7802656 7: onsuccess: #391: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 97d575da48 6: onsuccess: #390: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ce65b0278d 6: onsuccess: #390: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 671ac4c820 7: onsuccess: #391: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 06b7f32363 8: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 32fe2c5b7d 9: force: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new e2070d35dc 10: force: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp:[.] _ZN5cGate7deli [...] new 4e11c767ec 11: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline b [...] new 9c578c73ee 12: force: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 2322893263 13: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new dc62addf3e 14: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 208 commits new 5fac04a204 15: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 35 commits new a52dae0eba 16: onsuccess: #410: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new a7362ad306 17: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits new 3a2eb48fa5 18: onsuccess: #413: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new ec9d351d3c 19: force: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 18 [...] new 838d687d6c 20: force: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new 7f574f14e9 21: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 12 commits new 2e88326568 22: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 7ef8c08e8a 23: onsuccess: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 8e88226ab6 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 78af5a2926 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits new e6ab7ef5b2 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 2ff384172a 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new b97c2101cf 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new b4b58be96d 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] new bebd696698 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new b26b2ecdfb 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 21 [...] new 89404a3de2 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] new 954b088e2b 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 7a12012eae 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] new 91b92ed40d 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run [...] new 81dda0df12 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 4877e094ff 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new 015d090822 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits new 945512ce19 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] new c97dc1621f 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 2e2b41664a 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] new aa15038689 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new ffa9cb7c0f 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new de792756ba 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] new b768bc19ff 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new c148f593d3 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new 7b54284e3a 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 3663f22278 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new c3ce9d70e2 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new a83e4889ab 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 6cfe865213 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 66562e7a97 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bi [...] new a1b1d83406 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 700a16579b 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 770a7a084a 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] new 41d48c0e61 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK a [...] new 173000a84d 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 6450 [...] new d964731cb1 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new af6b03cdfe 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 7e37132c7b 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new 8f28feba76 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchpo [...] new 91af50bc4f 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new ce5f23306e 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] new e7a1ac7f7a 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slow [...] new 71afd3fb16 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 [...] new d5fe0a918e 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new 7c9f88aef7 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new db4a5d969e 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 7d60dc4f19 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 82cadd6ad1 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 85dbd324b2 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] new 7476761821 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_step [...] new 427d70ccbe 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits new fd41cbb0f3 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new 7816dc855b 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 commits new 1638d8a25f 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 755fdf8652 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 7c44e698d6 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new db70477398 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] new 4d36e6855d 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-4559 [...] new f7166c96f9 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] new fda6c8192e 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% a [...] new bdf0e49e67 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 5af7763208 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new be9cdce410 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 298cd10da8 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] new eb43393dcc 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new c427930827 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 5e525f7a31 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] new fde24ee9e8 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e1ce59f5e4 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 96580ef93e 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] new 51b7e6ce3c 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits new ed2c459952 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 72688102b3 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits new 16d0faf46d 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 8c359238a7 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits new 4567f740ce 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 231 [...] new 85792adaec 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits new f39a2621b5 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-48462 [...] new ad8cb542f5 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] new 7d808d9c2f 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new f72c7e3266 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new f1d4708f05 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 1cab60fc5b 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 592f65f5af 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new a2be295e19 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (576822624b) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2020 -> 2044 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2496 -> 2448 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27192 -> 27540 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 89932 -> 90428 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 336 -> 336 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 8384 -> 7564 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 233132 -> 234336 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 212044 -> 213292 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 205 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 203 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4252 -> 4276 bytes 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 158 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 16492 -> 16368 bytes .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement | 5 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement.diff | 2 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression | 4 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression.diff | 2 +- 11-update_baseline/console.log | 72 +- git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- jenkins/notify.sh | 2 +- manifest.sh | 28 +- results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 232 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 2844 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/results.csv | 721290 ++++++++-------- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/size.csv | 714914 ++++++++-------- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 28122 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 64 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2951 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3381 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 784366 +++++++++-------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 786883 +++++++++-------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 28714 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 60 +- results-vs-first/interesting-symbols.csv | 120 +- results-vs-first/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-first/results-full.csv | 3280 +- results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 246 +- results-vs-first/results.csv | 246 +- results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3364 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 242 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 16 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 3008 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 3335 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 790106 ++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 793101 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 28496 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 72 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2953 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3381 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 784366 +++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 786883 +++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 28714 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 60 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 120 +- results-vs-prev/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/results-full.csv | 3490 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 252 +- results-vs-prev/results.csv | 252 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 4072 +- results_id | 2 +- 62 files changed, 3130102 insertions(+), 3184719 deletions(-)