This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_size-spec2k6/gnu-aarch64-master-Os_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.

discards 786fc8e7a0 106: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards f86a95ec47 105: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 0338d03457 104: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards dd6a15f0ae 103: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards cdad0d5997 102: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards e5dec6a638 101: force: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 07514d5ca1 100: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 8a29673007 99: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards b0e00ca0de 98: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 6b099e3626 97: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards a4eb774a3f 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 9424d4fbe4 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 476df90684 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 23 commits discards 0ba60204d8 93: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after basepoints/gcc-13 [...] discards d3bb36bf72 92: force: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 148 commits discards 2e673759fb 91: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/linu [...] discards 2a50f8161d 90: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards ef082658b9 89: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.2.8-4846 [...] discards ebbf5a76f1 88: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards b3e0eb5a48 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards b5e09195ad 86: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 5 commits discards b2b21e4621 85: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2% [...] discards 021c765dfc 84: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 41 commits discards b9a1d0abad 83: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] discards d784ebe2a6 82: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 86833c3ac1 81: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards d32783a6fa 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 0f052e602f 79: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 17946cc35d 78: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards af69d06579 77: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards c27d39a23b 76: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards bfb59147a5 75: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards fb89aab88f 74: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 3f571cd9b1 73: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards cefc763ef7 72: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards cd7326097b 71: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 2ac80bc421 70: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 1a587bffa0 69: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 862bd37238 68: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 72290588bc 67: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards a8f468b58b 66: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 1ffd2881dc 65: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 6e3fc29d40 64: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 3055f66446 63: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 5428c59113 62: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng reduced in size by [...] discards e3f2a9e937 61: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 024a43d519 60: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards a72a6344c7 59: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 16263156ee 58: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 528cd7ca9b 57: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 3839525cd7 56: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 17891dd04f 55: onsuccess: #366: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 949 commits discards 9e51d4bbe7 54: force: #365: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng grew in size by 4% a [...] discards 37129b7a96 53: force: #364: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 19 commits discards 05031dd740 52: onsuccess: #363: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 112 [...] discards 2d4b31e242 51: onsuccess: #362: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 62 commits discards 49824e6948 50: onsuccess: #347: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 6ab1ce63d5 49: onsuccess: #344: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 34 commits discards b1ba257568 48: onsuccess: #342: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 84bd64ccbe 47: onsuccess: #332: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 157bd12b4e 46: onsuccess: #330: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-416 [...] discards 9a82b76d83 45: onsuccess: #328: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 3cb8009924 44: onsuccess: #326: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 844711bdea 43: onsuccess: #325: 1: [TCWG CI] 450.soplex reduced in size [...] discards 1340510f0a 42: onsuccess: #324: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD reduced in si [...] discards 1028776838 41: force: #323: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2 [...] discards f1cf37d4b1 40: onsuccess: #321: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards e29fb41098 39: onsuccess: #319: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 4753f3078d 38: onsuccess: #317: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards c5830288be 37: onsuccess: #316: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards b481b99989 36: onsuccess: #313: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards e8a9ccd9a7 35: onsuccess: #312: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 9b67afd738 34: onsuccess: #311: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 3285a87181 33: onsuccess: #310: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 665a813229 32: onsuccess: #308: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards f926b7537d 31: onsuccess: #307: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards d7d8aa672c 30: onsuccess: #306: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD reduced in si [...] discards 018d9d8ce0 29: onsuccess: #305: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 1c680236d8 28: onsuccess: #304: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 13 commits discards 4cd1bfdaa3 27: force: #303: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2 [...] discards da156dcd28 26: force: #302: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 104 commits discards bd3b4ecbcd 25: onsuccess: #301: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.9-39 [...] discards 3be06cfc63 24: onsuccess: #300: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits discards 5951a19248 23: onsuccess: #298: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards c04844e6e6 22: onsuccess: #295: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 0157a8cb71 21: onsuccess: #294: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 252 commits discards cae81a7739 20: force: #293: 1: [TCWG CI] 450.soplex grew in size by 2% [...] discards fc864ebeea 19: force: #292: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 27 commits discards ddbcffe227 18: onsuccess: #291: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.7-39 [...] discards 135dad8bca 17: onsuccess: #290: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 9 commits discards 0a0b8acb49 16: onsuccess: #288: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 1de9498d0a 15: onsuccess: #286: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.5-39 [...] discards 9a2b3603cc 14: onsuccess: #285: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 28 commits discards 67625e2993 13: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/gli [...] discards 1d42874340 12: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/lin [...] discards dfa4d7e24b 11: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/lin [...] discards a8096636e0 10: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/linux/ [...] discards 0e76060a4b 9: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/glibc: [...] discards 4aa772bdf8 8: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 discards 1839acf83a 7: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 discards 5189694be0 6: update: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 new ef7065b1b9 6: update: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 new aa20ee6abe 7: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 new 6802d48ba9 8: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc: 1 new a1281c6f2a 9: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/glibc: [...] new f745c305fa 10: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/linux/ [...] new c0015205ab 11: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/lin [...] new 4b9c8041e7 12: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/lin [...] new e9d30242f9 13: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/gli [...] new 9102fe4e59 14: onsuccess: #285: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 28 commits new dcefe7ee69 15: onsuccess: #286: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.5-39 [...] new 9a920ed44d 16: onsuccess: #288: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 80e34032c1 17: onsuccess: #290: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 9 commits new 436db55431 18: onsuccess: #291: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.7-39 [...] new 03232fa79d 19: force: #292: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 27 commits new fd1a73c073 20: force: #293: 1: [TCWG CI] 450.soplex grew in size by 2% [...] new 61be92e5b1 21: onsuccess: #294: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 252 commits new dc90c4b594 22: onsuccess: #295: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 05b0596445 23: onsuccess: #298: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 546700be52 24: onsuccess: #300: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits new 9ca798e45d 25: onsuccess: #301: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.9-39 [...] new 7bc95fb1e2 26: force: #302: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 104 commits new 7c9dc90c17 27: force: #303: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2 [...] new 126c0b11f7 28: onsuccess: #304: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 13 commits new 97cd68d651 29: onsuccess: #305: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 824c30cabd 30: onsuccess: #306: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD reduced in si [...] new cdf60e98c2 31: onsuccess: #307: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new c7e1610edf 32: onsuccess: #308: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 1148b098bb 33: onsuccess: #310: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new fbdd686a1d 34: onsuccess: #311: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 6fb94b6197 35: onsuccess: #312: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 5e20e27bd7 36: onsuccess: #313: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 4b89163bcb 37: onsuccess: #316: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new d8216705dc 38: onsuccess: #317: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new b5dbf11f34 39: onsuccess: #319: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 54208f7200 40: onsuccess: #321: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 6cb141540d 41: force: #323: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2 [...] new 8935b6154e 42: onsuccess: #324: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD reduced in si [...] new acad4922e2 43: onsuccess: #325: 1: [TCWG CI] 450.soplex reduced in size [...] new a19b3dd8af 44: onsuccess: #326: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new dabc93ea21 45: onsuccess: #328: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new f958030142 46: onsuccess: #330: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-416 [...] new f2e6875825 47: onsuccess: #332: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 441522ff80 48: onsuccess: #342: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 85e9fc7887 49: onsuccess: #344: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 34 commits new 9194684bf9 50: onsuccess: #347: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new f97b3a8f08 51: onsuccess: #362: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 62 commits new f86ab573d8 52: onsuccess: #363: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 112 [...] new 5b7ed9ea4a 53: force: #364: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 19 commits new 064354db6e 54: force: #365: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng grew in size by 4% a [...] new 56310a345e 55: onsuccess: #366: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 949 commits new 5f1e0e8cdc 56: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 059d8a8011 57: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 2b67df68b3 58: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 94a292095b 59: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 067354b785 60: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 95d01ff818 61: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new cade0854bc 62: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng reduced in size by [...] new c386aa9e96 63: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 26d00639a8 64: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new f6f0bf06fc 65: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 2cbf1f26cd 66: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 3932d2d4a3 67: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new a2ddadbad3 68: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 7e10faf408 69: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 9a32b03d13 70: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 1bbaba69d0 71: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 0582907c73 72: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 55e405db29 73: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new bdfc90718b 74: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 6f3332bd4c 75: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new cea2296f64 76: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new e6e022c5d8 77: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new d88b082939 78: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 8c3090a8e8 79: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new c850a30566 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 1480b0c3ab 81: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new fa7a84d232 82: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 6b1ded50cc 83: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] new 268ded3653 84: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 41 commits new 3a60feb35d 85: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2% [...] new a339ea71d0 86: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 5 commits new f0cff37a1f 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 51c3d2aadd 88: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 963aefebfe 89: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.2.8-4846 [...] new 52c304524e 90: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 5a4004975d 91: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/linu [...] new 32d8353777 92: force: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 148 commits new 212a2e787c 93: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after basepoints/gcc-13 [...] new 6a0aa6318d 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 23 commits new 283b982441 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new f74eec2033 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 8e177207c1 97: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new a4a61f3424 98: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 3d9a265f19 99: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 0fe2936a8c 100: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 9abaa92cea 101: force: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 2bf500ec2e 102: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 96bd7340d5 103: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 23c77d82b4 104: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 77bad4727d 105: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 525c15c05f 106: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 54acb23a5f 107: onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (786fc8e7a0) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_size-spec2k6/gn [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2232 -> 2220 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2424 -> 2492 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 28512 -> 28088 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 72496 -> 72648 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 332 -> 332 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 7624 -> 7628 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 243364 -> 243484 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 176940 -> 178508 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 101 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 99 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4060 -> 4012 bytes 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 42 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 8956 -> 8984 bytes .../output-bmk-results/exe.improvement | 1 + .../output-bmk-results/exe.improvement.diff | 1 + .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression | 2 +- .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression.diff | 2 +- 11-update_baseline/console.log | 72 +- git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- git/linux_rev | 2 +- manifest.sh | 32 +- results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 56 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 138 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 436 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 290 +- results-vs-first/interesting-symbols.csv | 2 +- results-vs-first/results-brief.csv | 62 +- results-vs-first/results-full.csv | 148 +- results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 69 +- results-vs-first/results.csv | 69 +- results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 2384 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 76 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 3 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 140 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 26891 +++++++++---------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 26858 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 138 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 436 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 290 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 2 +- results-vs-prev/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/results-full.csv | 166 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 75 +- results-vs-prev/results.csv | 75 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 2890 +- results_id | 2 +- 48 files changed, 31145 insertions(+), 30979 deletions(-) create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.improvement create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.improvement.diff