This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O2 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.

discards 41fa29b6d9a 116: onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 9ee03516b94 115: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards d95a46b0534 114: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 60cd0cfe836 113: onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards d3085fb2e4e 112: force: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] discards df9c958af23 111: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] discards 616220f911b 110: force: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] discards b855b58168e 109: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 40a3d43097f 108: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 09aa708fb02 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 21a000000cd 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 9fd467a9a48 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 707fc56afe4 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 97d58d1e589 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 9a1913c9148 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards dc21f6d880e 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gc [...] discards 89f082416cd 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-4846 [...] discards 6ad6008349d 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits discards 2d4d3673db7 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 23 [...] discards dfdd54c8834 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits discards e5cf76636c2 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards a963fad8d53 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits discards 637b2933e25 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards c0ba489a88d 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits discards 1ea2450d1d2 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/l [...] discards 03c773c1b9b 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 7b22828107f 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 0c1b9187cbb 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25 [...] discards a5905e11880 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 6e21af5b23e 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards ae18cd6abf3 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] discards 131123e66e4 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 66f460ac525 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 3a11a552dba 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 0623d9b376b 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% [...] discards e8e446a866d 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] discards 8a169be629e 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-455 [...] discards cf1a5418119 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 32d6f8a5284 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards ac4ebe9ccd6 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 5c43324f830 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 59e460e2610 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 [...] discards 8ec6d234874 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards cb13932f5f8 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits discards 5da32d32f88 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_ste [...] discards bb7d52cde89 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25 [...] discards e97d017e11f 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards f8a0031d892 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards df25577deec 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards dd28eb43027 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards 539a689048c 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards 4afc4ea8b66 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 7b5c9d1ceaa 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slo [...] discards 33dd44ebbe8 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] discards 9407fc0207b 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards 2ecc5f0c2a1 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchp [...] discards 847a4b1cc0e 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] discards 7a57c45b3aa 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] discards 54efc7af115 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] discards fb68856dc1a 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 645 [...] discards 258004c223f 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK [...] discards b9dde31dc54 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 69639d399c2 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] discards a10fb69c2b6 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after [...] discards 963c441f5dc 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after b [...] discards 386e1a3e04c 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards ec580173519 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards df7992e96f2 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 1a994b49b7f 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards eebf28557ac 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build afte [...] discards 2b7b5326c5f 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards 065652b392f 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards 541375ec781 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK af [...] discards 74ad211c649 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 5d0ea01b7f2 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards a3996038eb4 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and r [...] discards b92224e9e81 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 39ed74a4faf 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] discards 3084f823e28 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 [...] discards 3eb0307791c 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards 99d9fc1f2e7 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 10aebd83723 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and ru [...] discards 3c517a3efbd 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build [...] discards 3c16a7396e0 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards db8d30974ba 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% a [...] discards cb6ff5dc24e 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 2 [...] discards f2c69e8b081 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards c82dc57ec18 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 3 [...] discards b652f73bacd 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 73906237633 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 2802f5834bf 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards 7d1434d8fef 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits discards 6e85016ce95 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards d6528a1d1d1 23: onsuccess: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 4f8b54faaaf 22: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards a1c5ba1e1f9 21: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 12 commits discards 503f46d23f4 20: force: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gc [...] discards 7a32fd003f3 19: force: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 1 [...] discards 0ee676eef25 18: onsuccess: #413: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 6eb75037007 17: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 [...] discards a1af97b427b 16: onsuccess: #410: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 92082e0ce5a 16: onsuccess: #410: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 97a6d3e664a 17: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 [...] new d6485c84a57 18: onsuccess: #413: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 166cbfc6a68 19: force: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 1 [...] new 8774a0da533 20: force: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gc [...] new 619007a9607 21: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 12 commits new 2bc9efa82f0 22: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 10528abb403 23: onsuccess: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 408dfeeab12 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 9f475df39ca 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits new 281db45c552 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new b31dd40c4bd 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new bae9d921bef 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 6950f86d3c5 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 3 [...] new 071cf8e1ffb 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 7e8b2e231ff 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 2 [...] new 874ed2ce004 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% a [...] new cd56797ef69 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new bf806f11868 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build [...] new 411c3f1c010 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and ru [...] new fddc790b322 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 6c7de7768d0 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new dffa451668c 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 [...] new 3a1a4ee17d2 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] new 77356e38edf 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 9602ad5f09d 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and r [...] new 6cafb429274 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e0ea94cb048 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new ae5ac8cdedf 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK af [...] new 57c2f1066b4 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new a1691010261 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new da0707bb4fd 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build afte [...] new 34aafe97667 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new ebf4f3e0222 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 8066836f516 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new fa180ecfaf3 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 6d13bbe7363 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after b [...] new d0f8a280318 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after [...] new dd3b5054a43 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] new 9be1df4d5dc 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 2c48abe4231 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK [...] new c1d09a27b7c 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 645 [...] new 78d400f813a 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] new da49d74c471 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] new 5651aae7668 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] new 76e264fa401 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchp [...] new b77b7c78b82 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new 35c1acce36c 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] new 9ba1ce39f4b 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slo [...] new 55183816929 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 9163666f42b 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new 04b47901ac5 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new 7b56cfd61cf 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new dc0b719bde3 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 3fca1aa85b6 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 8c843eef831 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25 [...] new 74866fea2b7 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_ste [...] new 4f3e322f0da 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits new b84adb09350 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new 8a5b19ab7b3 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 [...] new 356265deb6b 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new a7faab0190b 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 9152f2d32d0 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 0b9a4a3a4a6 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new efccb09384a 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-455 [...] new a36302e7009 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] new 4c0a1657ad8 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% [...] new 4e9c06d5c37 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 669d8bada68 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new eb89c090d65 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new a57b523ebda 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] new 84661f297f0 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new f3a88925632 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new af6ab1a5465 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25 [...] new ded1ebf577e 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new dc2847545c3 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 643504f5c76 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/l [...] new d12e42f733a 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits new 28006808735 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new b8b3e3c4d64 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits new 1225154354a 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new da86e53612a 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits new 020bdbb0c94 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 23 [...] new 3c4d276fcad 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits new 61a22b3afd3 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-4846 [...] new b99c811472a 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gc [...] new cf7fef9eac4 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 8e06f628b3c 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 288f12a7ac9 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new d56124456a0 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 0913eb7b421 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 874ccecad2e 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 82ce681ed2f 108: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new d83c45903c0 109: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new bbb63dedd98 110: force: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] new 77d734e26a9 111: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] new 0b38c066197 112: force: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] new ae182070867 113: onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new ce375866b31 114: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 61350ebd6c2 115: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new d8d77682b84 116: onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new e38bb556a5f 117: onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (41fa29b6d9a) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2120 -> 2356 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2540 -> 2556 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27944 -> 27340 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz | Bin 17960 -> 17844 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 90940 -> 90252 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz | Bin 71004 -> 70168 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 7772 -> 8560 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 235252 -> 233640 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/make-glibc.log.xz | Bin 185860 -> 185660 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 213808 -> 212676 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz | Bin 180180 -> 179348 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 150 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 148 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4064 -> 4108 bytes 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 106 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 18244 -> 17556 bytes ...ymbol.improvement.diff => diff-bmk-results.out} | 1 + .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement | 9 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement.diff | 1 - .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression | 6 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression.diff | 1 - 11-update_baseline/console.log | 72 +- git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- git/linux_rev | 2 +- manifest.sh | 36 +- results-vs-first/cmp-results.diff | 1 + results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 249 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 2788 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/results.csv | 710650 +++++++-------- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/size.csv | 713982 +++++++-------- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 28946 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 64 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2978 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3309 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 817631 +++++++++-------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 831683 +++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 28664 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 62 +- ...ults-brief.csv => csvs2table-results-brief.csv} | 68 +- results-vs-first/csvs2table-results-full.csv | 1747 + results-vs-first/csvs2table-results-internal.csv | 128 + .../csvs2table-results-internal.csv.diff | 0 results-vs-first/csvs2table-results.csv | 128 + results-vs-first/interesting-symbols.csv | 103 +- results-vs-first/results-full.csv | 1767 - results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 253 +- results-vs-first/results.csv | 127 - results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3260 +- results-vs-prev/cmp-results.diff | 1 + results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 253 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 7 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 3214 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 3378 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 805521 +++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 816583 +++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 28666 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 74 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2978 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3309 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 817631 +++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 831683 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 28664 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 62 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-brief.csv | 35 + results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-full.csv | 1747 + results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-internal.csv | 128 + .../csvs2table-results-internal.csv.diff | 0 results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results.csv | 128 + results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 103 +- results-vs-prev/results-brief.csv | 35 - results-vs-prev/results-full.csv | 1767 - results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 253 +- results-vs-prev/results.csv | 127 - results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3868 +- results_id | 2 +- 77 files changed, 3231481 insertions(+), 3267862 deletions(-) copy 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/{symbol.improvement.diff => diff-bmk-r [...] create mode 100644 results-vs-first/cmp-results.diff rename results-vs-first/{results-brief.csv => csvs2table-results-brief.csv} (62%) create mode 100644 results-vs-first/csvs2table-results-full.csv create mode 100644 results-vs-first/csvs2table-results-internal.csv create mode 100644 results-vs-first/csvs2table-results-internal.csv.diff create mode 100644 results-vs-first/csvs2table-results.csv delete mode 100644 results-vs-first/results-full.csv delete mode 100644 results-vs-first/results.csv create mode 100644 results-vs-prev/cmp-results.diff create mode 100644 results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-brief.csv create mode 100644 results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-full.csv create mode 100644 results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-internal.csv create mode 100644 results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-internal.csv.diff create mode 100644 results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results.csv delete mode 100644 results-vs-prev/results-brief.csv delete mode 100644 results-vs-prev/results-full.csv delete mode 100644 results-vs-prev/results.csv