This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_size-spec2k6/gnu-aarch64-master-Os_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.

discards 692b0d1885 110: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards ad760c4815 109: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 2c9f5f922e 108: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 853f39698b 107: onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards c155e73d47 106: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards d2207ebc9d 105: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 7448dd6063 104: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 3053b2e19c 103: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 5f4c6ecff3 102: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards f4eae44732 101: force: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards c47d73f9b2 100: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 7482d45938 99: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 00503d934a 98: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 2f71d1f3c0 97: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 2c9f066259 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 980c549aba 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards be4f714449 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 23 commits discards 5133a986b7 93: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after basepoints/gcc-13 [...] discards 5a29ba1a6f 92: force: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 148 commits discards 2f6fef7718 91: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/linu [...] discards fd066aa17c 90: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards c9ae508d03 89: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.2.8-4846 [...] discards 9fbbfc31f4 88: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards 977463b532 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards add33b8bdb 86: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 5 commits discards ab238826dd 85: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2% [...] discards bf6502a021 84: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 41 commits discards dc9065e407 83: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] discards f718377cbd 82: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards b0b61ae35e 81: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 341d95eac3 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 964b6717de 79: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 15d0bddc57 78: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 3b7d8d7b0a 77: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 86759c8e44 76: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 5b9b2e1799 75: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards c9a72e1f3c 74: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards c8273cb7ca 73: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 0ea6099d8e 72: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards ae5247ea96 71: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 4a97a88e16 70: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards e757e325b2 69: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 5273fbbe7b 68: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 8e9f342646 67: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 1dcbb3f79b 66: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 0faa79f6a4 65: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 9abe60511a 64: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 9210cf3047 63: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 7388e6a2c1 62: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng reduced in size by [...] discards 54fe1524a4 61: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 269a4546a0 60: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 232302317b 59: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards a86a76a409 58: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 6343819a3a 57: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 09cab09230 56: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 2657ccaac1 55: onsuccess: #366: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 949 commits discards c27eaae728 54: force: #365: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng grew in size by 4% a [...] discards 6b33904c80 53: force: #364: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 19 commits discards 7ae3934718 52: onsuccess: #363: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 112 [...] discards 4f9f60983d 51: onsuccess: #362: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 62 commits discards 38caf83308 50: onsuccess: #347: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 79d4fba543 49: onsuccess: #344: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 34 commits discards 99f7e7ccf1 48: onsuccess: #342: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 532b34aa86 47: onsuccess: #332: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards a6fc87f67d 46: onsuccess: #330: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-416 [...] discards 5d9649825f 45: onsuccess: #328: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards da1798d22c 44: onsuccess: #326: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 899b611f96 43: onsuccess: #325: 1: [TCWG CI] 450.soplex reduced in size [...] discards 83b3fdf2fb 42: onsuccess: #324: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD reduced in si [...] discards 476fb0b3c3 41: force: #323: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2 [...] discards bdb6906296 40: onsuccess: #321: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 391611acf7 39: onsuccess: #319: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 8ec404e719 38: onsuccess: #317: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 1940977512 37: onsuccess: #316: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards d439e4c590 36: onsuccess: #313: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 51f94e3a91 35: onsuccess: #312: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards b47a84b8c5 34: onsuccess: #311: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 03d0fc8195 33: onsuccess: #310: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 0fbc333e69 32: onsuccess: #308: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 3c397fa272 31: onsuccess: #307: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards f3256d3749 30: onsuccess: #306: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD reduced in si [...] discards 892a3ea36b 29: onsuccess: #305: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards bad376f40c 28: onsuccess: #304: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 13 commits discards 139b06563f 27: force: #303: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2 [...] discards 348f2a2f90 26: force: #302: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 104 commits discards 1b364fa200 25: onsuccess: #301: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.9-39 [...] discards 2c9aa89de8 24: onsuccess: #300: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits discards be3532f856 23: onsuccess: #298: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 1e59af9886 22: onsuccess: #295: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 45cc97d2d5 21: onsuccess: #294: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 252 commits discards 554152f442 20: force: #293: 1: [TCWG CI] 450.soplex grew in size by 2% [...] discards a85591abcc 19: force: #292: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 27 commits discards 91fff0ab55 18: onsuccess: #291: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.7-39 [...] discards 6b40a9d840 17: onsuccess: #290: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 9 commits discards eaafa3e119 16: onsuccess: #288: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 2e9a60d430 15: onsuccess: #286: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.5-39 [...] discards 000d3d6424 14: onsuccess: #285: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 28 commits discards c45338c1ae 13: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/gli [...] discards 6e9a28c663 12: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/lin [...] discards 4c83fb4529 11: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/lin [...] discards 59cf03a752 10: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/linux/ [...] new 9db44eb600 10: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/linux/ [...] new c7a8aa69e1 11: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/lin [...] new 8309c03256 12: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/lin [...] new 9f7af94aad 13: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/gli [...] new 2209ecf05c 14: onsuccess: #285: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 28 commits new 21dce0a60e 15: onsuccess: #286: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.5-39 [...] new 8d3b6db6e7 16: onsuccess: #288: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 804ec5ec43 17: onsuccess: #290: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 9 commits new 454c18f2bc 18: onsuccess: #291: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.7-39 [...] new 35caa02369 19: force: #292: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 27 commits new 063703e196 20: force: #293: 1: [TCWG CI] 450.soplex grew in size by 2% [...] new 9fed75c6cf 21: onsuccess: #294: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 252 commits new 2051027a01 22: onsuccess: #295: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 03b28995e2 23: onsuccess: #298: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new a53f987e45 24: onsuccess: #300: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits new 43837f6f8f 25: onsuccess: #301: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.9-39 [...] new 4bcdb7c0e3 26: force: #302: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 104 commits new 355b404daa 27: force: #303: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2 [...] new 6c516e6813 28: onsuccess: #304: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 13 commits new 3b4f5416fb 29: onsuccess: #305: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 19e0506265 30: onsuccess: #306: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD reduced in si [...] new 733fdf9b9f 31: onsuccess: #307: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new de0fae9ec8 32: onsuccess: #308: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 3847c960be 33: onsuccess: #310: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new a85ad5b5cb 34: onsuccess: #311: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 8e5c8dfbdc 35: onsuccess: #312: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 9c79c23621 36: onsuccess: #313: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new ded2cfb979 37: onsuccess: #316: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new ee30bfa775 38: onsuccess: #317: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new b6a19d9212 39: onsuccess: #319: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 27271227bd 40: onsuccess: #321: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new ed39f822ec 41: force: #323: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2 [...] new 3ec9a90280 42: onsuccess: #324: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD reduced in si [...] new 5cd5e5df0a 43: onsuccess: #325: 1: [TCWG CI] 450.soplex reduced in size [...] new b6e1593415 44: onsuccess: #326: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 198211d270 45: onsuccess: #328: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 00f48086fa 46: onsuccess: #330: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-416 [...] new 4f94dbc458 47: onsuccess: #332: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new ef91279987 48: onsuccess: #342: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new c3f2c5ff50 49: onsuccess: #344: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 34 commits new cb37b4398a 50: onsuccess: #347: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 6cb01e2100 51: onsuccess: #362: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 62 commits new 97c8464993 52: onsuccess: #363: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 112 [...] new 08f097cd98 53: force: #364: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 19 commits new 8937bb1c26 54: force: #365: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng grew in size by 4% a [...] new 96d464a8ee 55: onsuccess: #366: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 949 commits new bff30721ac 56: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 0e0497f011 57: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 5be06d464a 58: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new c0862391ca 59: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 22baa0d657 60: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new a43bc7bdd0 61: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new bf9954515e 62: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng reduced in size by [...] new 3212989db9 63: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 2886180f99 64: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new f4609138e7 65: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new c814e97c80 66: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 2b383568bb 67: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 6028166403 68: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new d8651b7829 69: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new e6051dde35 70: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e3b0fb6cd1 71: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 37d337771b 72: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new f554e02c3a 73: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 733c34e5d1 74: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 0d9a78d49f 75: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 375e52cdfd 76: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 3f62509f5d 77: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 8d2b9c7324 78: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 95a471b078 79: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 503d54b9b4 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new e74ffb3383 81: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 49d56802c5 82: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 9641818e36 83: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] new 20596928a1 84: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 41 commits new d668cfad61 85: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2% [...] new 48a192e34d 86: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 5 commits new 6c48d2fe08 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ef1628f1c0 88: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new ffff2246ba 89: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.2.8-4846 [...] new c0514de4ec 90: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new ef3b4c8757 91: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/linu [...] new 979f7af9c4 92: force: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 148 commits new f29f1487bd 93: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after basepoints/gcc-13 [...] new ee6f8c0fb0 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 23 commits new 3dd3e8164a 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 133e2944dd 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 8df959317a 97: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 4629f95f71 98: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new d309ef6d89 99: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new a62dbb41a4 100: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new ddd7233e77 101: force: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 3439842812 102: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 1465e15469 103: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new d3a797a1ad 104: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new f92b15be87 105: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new af8fb975d0 106: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 5a3c8b11d5 107: onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 74aa28b70a 108: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new c269af3f65 109: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new f6aa2446b6 110: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 260ae57b20 111: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (692b0d1885) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_size-spec2k6/gn [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2200 -> 2208 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2464 -> 2484 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27912 -> 27980 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz | Bin 18172 -> 18324 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 73896 -> 73312 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz | Bin 53076 -> 52916 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 364 -> 364 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 7692 -> 7676 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 244596 -> 243856 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/make-glibc.log.xz | Bin 194612 -> 194664 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 181968 -> 178800 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz | Bin 147952 -> 146356 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 116 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 114 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4072 -> 4068 bytes 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 7804 -> 8296 bytes .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression | 1 + .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression.diff | 1 + 10-check_regression/results-vs-first | 1 + 10-check_regression/results-vs-prev | 1 + 11-update_baseline/console.log | 72 +- git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- git/linux_rev | 2 +- manifest.sh | 32 +- results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 60 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 148 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 38542 +++++++++---------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 38515 +++++++++--------- results-vs-first/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-first/results-full.csv | 172 +- results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 74 +- results-vs-first/results.csv | 74 +- results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3126 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 76 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 145 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 2584 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 2508 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 148 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 38542 +++++++++---------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 38515 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/results-brief.csv | 70 +- results-vs-prev/results-full.csv | 174 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 76 +- results-vs-prev/results.csv | 76 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3498 +- results_id | 2 +- 48 files changed, 83902 insertions(+), 83637 deletions(-) create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.regression create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.regression.diff create mode 120000 10-check_regression/results-vs-first create mode 120000 10-check_regression/results-vs-prev