This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O2 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.

discards 63d3be2a13e 109: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 662241cb8a1 108: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 9eaec32a89d 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 7565329a302 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 49053b252ad 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 4c70046aced 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 333702127de 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards c63c9ee5735 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 2222f979973 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gc [...] discards b4e9145903d 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-4846 [...] discards 0adea35d339 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits discards 748c63150d8 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 23 [...] discards 2be6d665691 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits discards c7334538132 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 88549d0f64c 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits discards e5a38da8d05 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 7a66e807c3f 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits discards 893302a6cfb 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/l [...] discards 23b193a0ce0 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 8cdc2ded4d0 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 077a71848dd 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25 [...] discards d297a637222 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 939f142de0b 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 15995c7eab4 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] discards ed80f5a2076 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards aee2e0b890e 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 801d4426f62 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards f6bddf0f74f 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% [...] discards 2b256f8f584 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] discards e271d67c02c 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-455 [...] discards f48fc89e035 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards da700450da3 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 73e0eeee01a 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards d1a98ea07bf 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 1176c64de8e 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 [...] discards a1453227a9d 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards 8e76f1b8e5e 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits discards 207fbcc9a35 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_ste [...] discards abbe2358b7f 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25 [...] discards 94f9da677f8 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards a72046cd982 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 472f81385c9 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards efe50566df2 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards 931b2590b5f 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards b8c5bc16a42 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 77ce5edef2a 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slo [...] discards b960bd48ae3 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] discards f0eef50223d 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards a6f09e704a9 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchp [...] discards 56fd2271b7c 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] discards 64e9d1aab12 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] discards af9a4023c46 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] discards 114317e91c0 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 645 [...] discards 37128d2034a 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK [...] discards f510c6e317b 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 2f2dabc15a3 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] discards 55041b81f20 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after [...] discards 18afe2cd18c 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after b [...] discards c1418756ff9 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 4c9dd8e08d6 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards c99531c6d1a 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 3a3cfe47900 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards 88a14052e3d 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build afte [...] discards 2a5ef5160ea 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards 731611d109b 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards b5ec70ba2ea 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK af [...] discards 83dc7128acf 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 691ffc7ed42 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 47967f74827 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and r [...] discards 098f4a63830 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards bf0d185100f 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] discards ba0847758cd 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 [...] discards 763f71002c6 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards 1eba3b0a65a 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 8c2b74bc5cc 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and ru [...] discards 367f26c8cab 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build [...] discards 8f3b4c40724 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 476650a58eb 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% a [...] discards b795d2854e2 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 2 [...] discards 1073bd9d436 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 4d8987a2d6f 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 3 [...] discards 28513f349a8 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 6770bad1177 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards cd7191467f7 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards 1d64db68281 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits discards 933774f3f43 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 2ad58d0e713 23: onsuccess: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 2fadfc287e0 22: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards d3f4cb3697a 21: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 12 commits discards 9d862fbb605 20: force: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gc [...] discards 84003d4e68d 19: force: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 1 [...] discards 24025a084cf 18: onsuccess: #413: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards bbb85edc82d 17: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 [...] discards 9251fce21b8 16: onsuccess: #410: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 884f3a018c5 15: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 35 [...] discards 20a2ec7f31e 14: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 208 commits discards b9835649918 13: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards c8260327e71 12: force: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards 88157cab922 11: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline [...] discards 3abe6a93d1f 10: force: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp:[.] _ZN5cGate7del [...] discards 790db042824 9: force: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17 [...] new 6ccf1b20718 9: force: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17 [...] new e7aedf8b302 10: force: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp:[.] _ZN5cGate7del [...] new 2922d049ea3 11: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline [...] new 9ca719c79df 12: force: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 0fe10009f70 13: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 8abd25cba65 14: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 208 commits new cd56947cb88 15: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 35 [...] new 2dabcb5a48a 16: onsuccess: #410: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 00412517f74 17: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 [...] new fae310726c7 18: onsuccess: #413: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new b193becd840 19: force: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 1 [...] new 1a3784108fe 20: force: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gc [...] new 168aabe6349 21: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 12 commits new cffe65385a5 22: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 843dccef8fe 23: onsuccess: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 977d585eb5c 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 7fe89e845d2 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits new 24f7b07ee2b 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 29a5dfd9f1f 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new ebbb3a730e3 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 5489a135ae5 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 3 [...] new 8e1e0a09219 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new e2e37b591d0 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 2 [...] new 911b78bfcb3 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% a [...] new c07c730cc6e 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new a8e47c36ade 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build [...] new 477a4b39dab 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and ru [...] new 639df70fea7 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 950cd0c1c1e 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new d6c1034be21 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 [...] new 897699b3580 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] new 35199721386 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new aab0506449d 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and r [...] new 379125a7b2f 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 1f3e7d4f6f1 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 5b6392609a3 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK af [...] new 19e6641c1a0 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 8b677148cec 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new c7dc39d5526 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build afte [...] new c297f861a63 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new 57b7e20d4b6 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 2aaca12d642 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new ffe13d7ecbb 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new a37c30aefed 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after b [...] new ca2ef347526 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after [...] new f608fbf353c 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] new 49c71be0a9b 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 803487caa2d 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK [...] new eb274eb2c07 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 645 [...] new c7c0300a57a 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] new f295ee8c3f6 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] new 918c58350e3 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] new e784dec04ba 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchp [...] new 9c8a3d4c9ab 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new d1353a93392 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] new e2fea600936 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slo [...] new 14444347bbc 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new c6b5fe95c6a 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new 48269ee96a0 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new a96167b9dfa 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new fe5ad63c7c8 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new f70bf22d07f 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 12c240e13f8 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25 [...] new 3366eb78093 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_ste [...] new 0a28d13a7dd 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits new f6dab2e6b89 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new c8cf1e16c1c 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 [...] new 7f224c586d8 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 895fe285341 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 44c561f1e3c 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new a57436e5734 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 1c7fb75e02b 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-455 [...] new 6f798097956 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] new f614c55f1bf 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% [...] new 5bd056bdbe3 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new bf19ee9e6af 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 1932b0601d0 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 7b20fe3253c 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] new c765bb4b821 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new d27179b58fb 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new f66da5fc8b3 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25 [...] new 14126731422 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 939d88459d9 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 70d79e6330e 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/l [...] new 1d712c0858c 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits new bece042983e 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 59091137888 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits new b9a9e92f386 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new c12cc278871 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits new 5cdd127f5e7 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 23 [...] new 954be32628b 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits new ac3c74fd15a 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-4846 [...] new 6f13270d93f 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gc [...] new 806cf2cff34 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new b2db40d848d 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new b3d09eb351c 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new cad142aaa20 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 666a6f387b8 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 92c52c9803d 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new d5e1ae00a6a 108: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 01f3f996238 109: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 93347112954 110: force: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (63d3be2a13e) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2224 -> 2196 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2456 -> 2480 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27640 -> 27580 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 91676 -> 91152 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 7656 -> 7700 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 233936 -> 234464 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 211836 -> 212952 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 191 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 189 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4124 -> 4136 bytes 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 182 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 17680 -> 19160 bytes 10-check_regression/exe.regression | 1 + 10-check_regression/extra-bisect-params | 2 +- .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression | 1 + .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression.diff | 2 + .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement | 5 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression | 8 +- 10-check_regression/results.regressions | 1 + 10-check_regression/trigger-bisect | 3 + 11-update_baseline/console.log | 44 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- mail/check-regression-status.txt | 2 +- mail/exe.regression | 1 + manifest.sh | 26 +- results | 1 + results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 238 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 26 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/results.csv | 26 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2966 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3437 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 47604 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 656198 ++++++++------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 28660 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 66 +- results-vs-first/interesting-symbols.csv | 170 +- results-vs-first/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-first/results-full.csv | 3294 +- results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 252 +- results-vs-first/results.csv | 252 +- results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3494 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 244 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 16 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 2948 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 3331 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 739439 ++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 757574 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 28000 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 58 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 3142 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3437 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 47604 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 656198 ++++++++------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 28660 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 66 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 170 +- results-vs-prev/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/results-full.csv | 3486 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 254 +- results-vs-prev/results.csv | 254 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3986 +- results_id | 2 +- 62 files changed, 1521861 insertions(+), 1504488 deletions(-) create mode 100644 10-check_regression/exe.regression create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.regression create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.regression.diff create mode 100644 10-check_regression/results.regressions create mode 100644 10-check_regression/trigger-bisect create mode 100644 mail/exe.regression