This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3.

discards 57961fdb3 onsuccess: #122: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 75f0d7570 onsuccess: #121: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards dcd7f7664 onsuccess: #120: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards c484ba285 onsuccess: #119: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 84b1ff0f0 onsuccess: #118: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 290981c38 onsuccess: #116: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 297e49af4 onsuccess: #108: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 989a7a334 onsuccess: #103: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 237cb0f99 onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards ed019f011 onsuccess: #88: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 89b8b037d onsuccess: #87: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards f690a6727 onsuccess: #86: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 49b6c2273 120: onsuccess: #85: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 2b59edbc1 119: onsuccess: #84: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 6c27b7020 118: onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards f3542d589 117: onsuccess: #82: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards dd2545f0b 116: force: #79: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 8f06ac4d0 115: onsuccess: #77: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards ea759ea94 114: onsuccess: #75: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 962d62650 113: onsuccess: #74: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards e1cd15a7a 112: onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 2da8e5ee4 111: onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 49010d497 110: onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 8e8e40d2d 109: force: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 5cdceb3c1 108: force: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 97d4a8bcb 107: force: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 4df9d5837 106: onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 0f68b858b 105: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 5e794c3d9 104: force: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 683172c22 103: force: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 9ecd885f4 102: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards c5f1cf96d 101: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 0abfaf3b1 100: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 6c4c4f152 99: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards c45852afa 98: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/g [...] discards 56362ab2c 97: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/g [...] discards 41d09f9d5 96: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] discards d7b5be22c 95: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/g [...] discards ea6fd0217 94: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 63 commits discards a02a1d669 93: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/lin [...] discards 87f57bd20 92: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards d463daf59 91: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] discards d0f964642 90: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards 6b0d0f2a2 89: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards c7b059e9d 88: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards f2697c28b 87: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards b787f47c1 86: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 106 commits discards b206e2cba 85: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 16% [...] discards 713644f59 84: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -13% a [...] discards dd84749bc 83: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards dc5f92d14 82: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc-1 [...] discards 5ef0ba5c6 81: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 16964 [...] discards 3f5cdbfe4 80: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] discards 08b349a0c 79: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 95 [...] discards 68be405f7 78: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 19% [...] discards 36dab2126 77: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] discards 1096342b3 76: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 11% [...] discards 3ca7c1093 75: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards 6e0943b4d 74: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -16 [...] discards c586428d3 73: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% a [...] discards 05055cf0c 72: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 commits discards e1e39713f 71: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits discards 7dd076f24 70: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% a [...] discards 35c0829f2 69: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards f1577ddbb 68: force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 666aa2772 67: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] discards 828f40f88 66: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 17949bb80 65: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 2b374f790 64: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards e5981b923 63: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 5bcb3b5ff 62: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 341 commits discards fd2639630 61: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc-1 [...] discards 4f50203f9 60: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 9 commits discards 8d87f321b 59: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 32 [...] discards 83e9c5c71 58: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards ecf977261 57: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] discards df0405d5a 56: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 0b8bc8e8a 55: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.9000- [...] discards 3104c752f 54: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 88cdb5e09 53: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] discards fce6a9eda 52: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 3c9444129 51: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] discards b9e192f2a 50: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 2adb1f1a9 49: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bas [...] discards 45cef0d25 48: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits discards 0bc92ce58 47: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 54 commits discards 345f60683 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK afte [...] discards a48002712 45: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 6ad5b1c06 44: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bas [...] discards 3634b61bf 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -7% [...] discards 391d85c04 42: onsuccess: #543: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...] discards e22bb530c 41: onsuccess: #541: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK af [...] discards bd14f97ba 40: force: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after b [...] discards 414366574 39: onsuccess: #535: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 5039d291e 38: force: #524: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] discards 64f1a3800 37: force: #523: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray:[.] _ZN3pov17Check_A [...] discards d4b70526e 36: force: #522: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards f7cd90e55 35: onsuccess: #520: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...] discards 10702c18f 34: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards c6f2e1f9c 33: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 1da0105bb 32: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 3d9811ba1 31: onsuccess: #512: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards 8f7abffe4 30: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 86 commits discards 67a6f159d 29: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 1a4cf9e47 28: onsuccess: #507: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 81d7f802e 27: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards d59570419 26: onsuccess: #505: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards 0040a0d07 25: force: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards 284fc13d4 24: force: #503: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 71 commits discards 475344360 23: force: #501: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards 3d355afea 22: force: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref:[.] __memcpy_neon s [...] discards d1ebab880 21: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards f662d6903 20: onsuccess: #496: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 103 commits discards 02613c428 19: force: #495: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 slowed down by 4% a [...] discards 7d832d981 18: force: #494: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 96 commits new a9b725b2c force: #494: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk_ [...] new 003f8a54d 19: force: #495: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 slowed down by 4% a [...] new 65c33c236 20: onsuccess: #496: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 103 commits new 8b00e5781 21: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new aca4c8e3e 22: force: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref:[.] __memcpy_neon s [...] new 4ee834ee5 23: force: #501: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new eb6c09d0a 24: force: #503: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 71 commits new 55fade9be 25: force: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new 94f146baa 26: onsuccess: #505: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new ab4392489 27: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 376118ffb 28: onsuccess: #507: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 741306fa6 29: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new fb11d4824 30: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 86 commits new fd2c40fc0 31: onsuccess: #512: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new b616e37a9 32: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new d93858104 33: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 33e68ea49 34: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new f36beca7b 35: onsuccess: #520: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...] new 04f504928 36: force: #522: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new a54e2c31d 37: force: #523: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray:[.] _ZN3pov17Check_A [...] new c02cc9fe9 38: force: #524: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] new 1df272fc6 39: onsuccess: #535: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 6ff21a6ff 40: force: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after b [...] new 8c03522f3 41: onsuccess: #541: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK af [...] new c58b50b38 42: onsuccess: #543: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...] new 34efc7212 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -7% [...] new a967a95bf 44: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bas [...] new 61aba3534 45: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 906f87d44 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK afte [...] new 7fe678365 47: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 54 commits new 570a2c798 48: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits new c9f0ec59a 49: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bas [...] new a2aad79fd 50: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new d6fe63358 51: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new edd5447b9 52: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 963c3c6b9 53: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new 1869dae4c 54: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 27e08f547 55: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.9000- [...] new 67e062c20 56: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new d2c2fe89d 57: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] new 5da01f376 58: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 604b89d6f 59: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 32 [...] new e909b90bb 60: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 9 commits new ab2f92005 61: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc-1 [...] new 52a157249 62: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 341 commits new 22f7a5ab9 63: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 99e10564b 64: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 7d40f00de 65: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 848d1617d 66: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new f0c0cfe5d 67: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] new 228ccabc1 68: force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 7d637247a 69: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 71d7510b7 70: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% a [...] new ae7c42cb4 71: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits new c375e66ea 72: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 commits new 5306fc9e1 73: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% a [...] new 7e5d70d96 74: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -16 [...] new 10c341ba1 75: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new e1d1681f4 76: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 11% [...] new 4070e63e1 77: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] new 08659c53e 78: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 19% [...] new f3141dc89 79: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 95 [...] new b064191ea 80: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] new b9dff0c0c 81: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 16964 [...] new 7bf55217c 82: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc-1 [...] new 599de2d41 83: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 88f7d9fa2 84: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -13% a [...] new 0da7e2560 85: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 16% [...] new d46481ef2 86: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 106 commits new 8d56eb048 87: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new f2535effe 88: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new c9e44a880 89: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new e3ca425c2 90: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new a606ada23 91: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new a263b50bd 92: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 1be878ee0 93: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/lin [...] new 459f4e1a2 94: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 63 commits new fe8eb142a 95: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/g [...] new 53c92c425 96: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new 4f371f2df 97: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/g [...] new dc037b457 98: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/g [...] new 51c6774d1 99: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 5b457c00d 100: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new b6d58ba10 101: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new a0e48807d 102: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new abdf5e460 103: force: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new f17bf4b49 104: force: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 34f2f839a 105: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 17091e945 106: onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 5a368b22c 107: force: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 7e2968a61 108: force: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 0ee88da5a 109: force: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 732ac4144 110: onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new cc990dcbe 111: onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 69d501a8b 112: onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 7847470ed 113: onsuccess: #74: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new f0ab2efb5 114: onsuccess: #75: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 57fbcb042 115: onsuccess: #77: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new f9c56fb3e 116: force: #79: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 04e5278c0 117: onsuccess: #82: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new a823b731c 118: onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 83a9cb1db 119: onsuccess: #84: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 9d71bd1bb 120: onsuccess: #85: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new eeb86b806 onsuccess: #86: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new ea9dddfd6 onsuccess: #87: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 09890a9d3 onsuccess: #88: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 33b4ed87c onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new e9da48fc5 onsuccess: #103: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 66e0bd6c2 onsuccess: #108: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 79f929e5f onsuccess: #116: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 38b1d2300 onsuccess: #118: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 1b441f0fb onsuccess: #119: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new e6d8f1a6d onsuccess: #120: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new bcde78ef6 onsuccess: #121: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new d19064137 onsuccess: #122: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (57961fdb3) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 115 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: