This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO.

discards c89de6187 onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 651133686 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 8f67ed1eb onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 0d0e70110 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 33dc8bf2b onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 1fd507a6e onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards bc5c1c75c onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 3cff437b8 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 0150b4b7f onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards e4a95f9c7 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 8df0be086 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 65924e164 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards ca43f6b14 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards b91ad5201 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 64954bbb2 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 48a4f6082 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards f9a3d8237 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards f8ad28446 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 0880908e0 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 2a2e3223a 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards ee4d63843 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards e75a9776e 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 2ab0357af 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards f532921e2 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 604abe6dc 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] discards 77be4fd02 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] discards a828999f9 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 5247799a0 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] discards c1193cc5b 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards db9fbe5b0 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 099a99434 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] discards 8b0a70804 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards 1b367de72 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards e72765193 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] discards 2c7e6e769 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] discards c290cd8d4 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards ee1003962 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits discards bcd593c36 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] discards 7cdfdd338 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] discards 891e1b42f 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits discards c7e0dd164 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards bfcc5cee9 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards fa1e26266 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards cba9a4899 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards ad2c8b4d8 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards b65cd340c 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards 1dabf9274 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] discards 35102b439 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 17d92f978 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] discards 134190263 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 2f424e7a1 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] discards 6cf3bbf3e 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards b8623555f 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 71f32d172 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards e39296592 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 45901bd4c 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards da6e3f92d 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 3510e8268 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] discards 749015671 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 0680d7edf 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards b71743268 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] discards 807adfd8d 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 6622e689e 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards c880a0da3 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] discards 26316631a 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] discards ecc9edbfd 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards 7c8bfcbb5 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 79a1ee141 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] discards 6bcc2c47c 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards 0b5236d45 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards ed4a53315 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] discards 6396ae92f 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits discards 44e0eede1 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards 23843e183 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits discards 63fd9b28f 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] discards c5bbae269 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards e1a675d48 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards e8e856d8b 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards 12d3fa820 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards e2377a22b 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 44ed16f8b 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 79c0c6286 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 165807325 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 0d4d7b641 onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 302d3808f 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new fdc2ca37f 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new ec08fb53e 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e51cf32b5 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new abc2d69bf 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new 1523319c6 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 86c004df8 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 4f9185716 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] new afb176a55 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new 743250e1c 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 623722023 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits new 82d7a4322 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new de23ac468 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new bf33c8143 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new d2ebd948e 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new caa431f6a 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new bb115815d 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new d17e5a705 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] new c1852930f 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] new da645ff8c 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 85fdea4e8 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 6613ccf72 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new b2a130d04 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 88a5a28a7 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 66e39bdbc 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] new 7ae80c153 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 7811bc5cd 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 924cab9b2 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new dfaca3d92 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new a7a2344cb 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new b8d83c3e0 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 4828fe824 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] new 325d7e937 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 33b58df3d 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new 2ec1f8d6f 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 687e58e48 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] new d790ee0c7 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 5f31d7ef8 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 1fb41c819 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new e5ce34e17 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 44325729d 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 941292d6d 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new b3d69481b 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new f96d62a0c 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] new 34285dced 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] new 21ff9c40e 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits new 7a7d42589 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 06f99439e 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new 30104e33e 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] new 47947648b 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new ad6e9acf6 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 5e38168c4 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new 03b0cb230 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] new e54e9a669 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new 46982fd80 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new bd0498941 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 6bd952843 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new efddcf596 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new b5787d2c5 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new f5d8b567a 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 523f1e9ae 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 9f5307cea 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 4d5fb7c59 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new eec7904a7 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 10e888d2c 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 957af46d3 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 5b4436659 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 5b760f88c 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new e11678fda 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 11b6bbffe 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 4ebf5bbb6 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new a1c67006b 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 38344c616 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 503d35ba1 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new e93aedc79 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 2bbe33bbf onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 283862421 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 17a51437c onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new c25f66d43 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 17f5cd5b2 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new b64dacf74 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new f067a4e3c onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (c89de6187) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 83 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: