This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O3 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O3.

discards 6f0877a8 onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards b22e022e onsuccess: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 0bec4d5b onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards c643c8db onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards e9b1d10c onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards f81c4c0b 69: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 205ab2bb 68: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards d1bcc66e 67: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 00212c1e 66: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 96940dff 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 67713cbe 64: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 39777506 63: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards a1f68054 62: force: #21: : [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bm [...] discards b8f556cf 61: force: #18: [.] strcmp [...] discards f5b66b7d 60: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards cf93907f 59: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] discards b60dc0df 58: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 97db8941 57: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 2687201d 56: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards fb4420f7 55: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 0a821e8d 54: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards e2b0354c 53: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards f35bef1c 52: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 293 commits discards 9845fc8b 51: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-17-init- [...] discards e68678e9 50: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 61 commits discards 329f5d0d 49: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 0e06bf1b 48: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards e398e1ff 47: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 322d77e2 46: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 37005e58 45: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 9681dc02 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 603 commits discards a6584119 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 31fa73ea 42: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards b506dd3e 41: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards f9c1c37e 40: onsuccess: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 37a624f3 39: onsuccess: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -7 [...] discards 18e131aa 38: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 21431ae4 37: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 268b9717 36: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 89eb81ba 35: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 01277c3e 34: onsuccess: #404: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards a1b1c671 33: onsuccess: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.9-4167 [...] discards b12bd015 32: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...] discards f9741cd9 31: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 78 commits discards d9f1dee2 30: onsuccess: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 [...] discards 71ff52c6 29: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 958 commits discards 4c3733bb 28: onsuccess: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 76536028 27: force: #393: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 9627e3f3 26: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] discards ffa8bf51 25: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 623 commits discards c7704092 24: force: #386: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% a [...] discards 3af4a0ab 23: force: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 939 commits discards a6595cdd 22: onsuccess: #383: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards eb9d859f 21: force: #381: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards ca6a1481 20: onsuccess: #379: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards de05e389 19: force: #377: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards b00a964f 18: onsuccess: #375: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 59898a79 17: onsuccess: #370: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 622ac800 16: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1752 [...] discards 9ef22490 15: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 179 commits discards 4fcb6496 14: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...] discards caba6445 13: onsuccess: #361: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 684a9e46 12: onsuccess: #360: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 257 commits discards 4f532ad0 11: onsuccess: #359: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 4ea28cc7 10: onsuccess: #357: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards ef04e477 9: onsuccess: #356: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -4% [...] discards e6f5d4fc 8: onsuccess: #355: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 31 commits discards bc9b1b1d 7: force: #354: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% af [...] discards bc2a2a46 6: force: #353: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 179 commits discards 3732c7ce 5: onsuccess: #351: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer built and run OK a [...] new 3a015f58 onsuccess: #351: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 1517314f 6: force: #353: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 179 commits new 1ebdf501 7: force: #354: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% af [...] new 8d36d1d8 8: onsuccess: #355: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 31 commits new 5c7965aa 9: onsuccess: #356: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -4% [...] new 59fe387e 10: onsuccess: #357: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 749d4d6d 11: onsuccess: #359: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 8e04b417 12: onsuccess: #360: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 257 commits new 251bbb96 13: onsuccess: #361: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 9050e281 14: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...] new 7edc88a8 15: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 179 commits new d0bf2e9a 16: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1752 [...] new 04ea231f 17: onsuccess: #370: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b8b8aa1e 18: onsuccess: #375: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 8f6e9a7d 19: force: #377: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 91a175f5 20: onsuccess: #379: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 76bb41c7 21: force: #381: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 62640361 22: onsuccess: #383: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 0793dada 23: force: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 939 commits new 8367f10c 24: force: #386: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% a [...] new aefb67c4 25: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 623 commits new 6ff7fa5e 26: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new b0748f1d 27: force: #393: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 393dc007 28: onsuccess: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 85da614a 29: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 958 commits new d93cfa29 30: onsuccess: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 [...] new 48f818c7 31: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 78 commits new b026cce8 32: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...] new 9c072474 33: onsuccess: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.9-4167 [...] new 43ec5a54 34: onsuccess: #404: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 385573dd 35: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new f8c5a37a 36: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new f0c08da1 37: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 33d17ba9 38: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new a3a40572 39: onsuccess: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -7 [...] new 0cc63be7 40: onsuccess: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new dbb52250 41: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 718d6dfc 42: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new af201f48 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 8b29f6c7 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 603 commits new 7cdd87f5 45: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new d6a1370f 46: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new fec31f70 47: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 4dae1170 48: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 52f14027 49: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new c48ff9ab 50: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 61 commits new 84e70650 51: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-17-init- [...] new a84fe72f 52: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 293 commits new 4a1adf1e 53: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 0396cc00 54: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 79b9de3f 55: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 4e516650 56: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 1c7bf7f6 57: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 00b68224 58: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 70c20b1a 59: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new 8ecd2a73 60: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 6c4de349 61: force: #18: [.] strcmp [...] new 695063bd 62: force: #21: : [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bm [...] new eb721984 63: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 63f23f35 64: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new e4d1a71d 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 098f21d6 66: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 24906b6e 67: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 19d5f836 68: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 2a3f50e1 69: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 71e19793 onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 714aea8b onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 6f811b3e onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 3e04e87b onsuccess: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 8977f096 onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (6f0877a8) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/l [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 70 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: