This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.

discards 8aebfda6dd 113: onsuccess: #74: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 35d284a2f3 112: onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 1fd40e8233 111: onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards e8849f7e34 110: onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 391e54d03e 109: force: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 92b8d0d977 108: force: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 74e2788288 107: force: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 7687b5520e 106: onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards b197bc0943 105: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 0c85cf9a11 104: force: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards dbbc7fe002 103: force: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 46bb3282e6 102: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards cbee3347e0 101: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards df0013745f 100: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards e7da03216f 99: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 969cbb5411 98: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 7a23ce820c 97: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 01ccf773c2 96: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 086a82cf90 95: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards f9f8bac668 94: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 63 commits discards 5b1c2ff35c 93: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] discards 9c86f1174e 92: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 8a57f872e5 91: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] discards e84b0c63b1 90: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 70ef011673 89: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 149e15abd0 88: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 30e1071890 87: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 31f7bd1935 86: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 106 commits discards 548e7eeda2 85: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 16% [...] discards c63b78b3e3 84: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -13% [...] discards c5c0fc6d5e 83: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 14fad5eae5 82: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards 62e3451a14 81: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1696 [...] discards 679b66c4bd 80: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards dea0988074 79: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 9 [...] discards 408dff83e7 78: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 19% [...] discards 36e2dffcba 77: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 86d8d27c8c 76: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 11% [...] discards d6afb7ab35 75: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards 84a2bc3ace 74: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] discards 488407ee0b 73: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards a7b2e18557 72: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 commits discards d7973ba7a0 71: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits discards ae7ade428a 70: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards 957f0a4729 69: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards b753a10909 68: force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 94e074edf2 67: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 5cb998e057 66: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards bb0e0c33f7 65: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 5e6f9fa341 64: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards e6fe6608a7 63: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards f561d28050 62: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 341 commits discards 54e96fb798 61: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards f74cdf19c0 60: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 9 commits discards fa1605b250 59: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards 844b8e3cd9 58: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 4dbf78f546 57: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards b7fe532acd 56: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 75c82c281f 55: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.9000 [...] discards 58b018ffaf 54: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] discards 38aeefef2b 53: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] discards 50df7974da 52: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards b576ebc04a 51: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] discards 4ab9ec4f5f 50: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards 2059a89ff5 49: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] discards 3da83f842b 48: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits discards 7892ed6483 47: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 54 commits discards 04b4ae6a0f 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] discards 20a73dc2f6 45: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 3ce6f6e82f 44: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] discards 00d1c6e8e0 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -7 [...] discards 4b54bc51d1 42: onsuccess: #543: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36 [...] discards d2b170e5b5 41: onsuccess: #541: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK a [...] discards aab3a3f3c7 40: force: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards b340540cf4 39: onsuccess: #535: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 8a74785cdd 38: force: #524: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 04ab51f8fb 37: force: #523: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray:[.] _ZN3pov17Check_ [...] discards 45abb89a5a 36: force: #522: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 686c241099 35: onsuccess: #520: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 40bcf6abb6 34: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 849715b001 33: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards a1cc24b36c 32: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 831db0aa59 31: onsuccess: #512: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 2d5a1982ad 30: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 86 commits discards b22ec546be 29: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards b7bfe80410 28: onsuccess: #507: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards e7558de8ad 27: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards f88bc334c1 26: onsuccess: #505: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards 927f3f09e8 25: force: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards 0e1004edb8 24: force: #503: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 71 commits discards e7e0dddfc7 23: force: #501: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards 973a8d9cd5 22: force: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref:[.] __memcpy_neon [...] discards 12d13198ab 21: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 699ebc1386 20: onsuccess: #496: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 103 commits discards e6a04f15b5 19: force: #495: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 slowed down by 4% [...] discards ba4466255d 18: force: #494: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 96 commits discards 419c6e174b 17: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards ddb2f997aa 16: force: #489: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 2990d8153a 15: onsuccess: #488: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 122 [...] discards 3461ac0769 14: onsuccess: #487: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits discards d883d8bf9c 13: onsuccess: #483: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 speeds up by - [...] new cc6b63f0b9 13: onsuccess: #483: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 speeds up by - [...] new 26fc2a0605 14: onsuccess: #487: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits new 61d5b9850f 15: onsuccess: #488: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 122 [...] new c14b63e295 16: force: #489: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 879ed526aa 17: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 6a728bf9b0 18: force: #494: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 96 commits new d5b964eed9 19: force: #495: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 slowed down by 4% [...] new e91007101a 20: onsuccess: #496: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 103 commits new 94b0e6c01f 21: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new e9183a2fa5 22: force: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref:[.] __memcpy_neon [...] new 1f46f1f787 23: force: #501: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new bd0cde9ac8 24: force: #503: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 71 commits new d66003b66b 25: force: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new 12206d9308 26: onsuccess: #505: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new d43c42e67d 27: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 16833dc175 28: onsuccess: #507: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 4d47e8b19d 29: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 86811e1358 30: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 86 commits new 8487e1a99c 31: onsuccess: #512: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 881e1e47fb 32: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 3b417d8cb4 33: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 12df327cb7 34: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 77dbd89b72 35: onsuccess: #520: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 77c527777c 36: force: #522: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 77c83b73a1 37: force: #523: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray:[.] _ZN3pov17Check_ [...] new cec3fa2bc8 38: force: #524: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new c92121b501 39: onsuccess: #535: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 8874d055c3 40: force: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new a270134b02 41: onsuccess: #541: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK a [...] new 772eea1ae5 42: onsuccess: #543: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36 [...] new e8c5560cca 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -7 [...] new b861cae9e8 44: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] new 5c1ada9281 45: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new cf3f6959e9 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] new 67938ff08c 47: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 54 commits new 36d9de12f4 48: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits new 21cb50fcbf 49: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] new 174166001e 50: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new c29a1181eb 51: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] new 9c58747383 52: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 5f522dbb49 53: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] new 6e7d284a07 54: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] new 0104f021b6 55: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.9000 [...] new 02a805d185 56: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 78475f17e2 57: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 902e560c9e 58: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new d19ecb2aa9 59: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new b31c6fea50 60: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 9 commits new 6fe5898075 61: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new 2099b6aeb9 62: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 341 commits new 7292142e4c 63: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new aa8270087f 64: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 2442b96301 65: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 678113a781 66: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 1d35cf79e8 67: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new d89c8be1e2 68: force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 45535e134a 69: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new db01f851e6 70: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new a9a9daa958 71: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits new 7e949046cb 72: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 commits new 0570991cde 73: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 8d7aea131b 74: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] new 049d0ad0bd 75: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new e022bbf422 76: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 11% [...] new f6f652bc64 77: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 742976ffb8 78: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 19% [...] new a271f4e5ce 79: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 9 [...] new 5c7d042ed7 80: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new aabdb95aa0 81: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1696 [...] new 0a779e56a2 82: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new e7b91e5d28 83: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 01d65a2b78 84: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -13% [...] new 1eee63aeab 85: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 16% [...] new 0ae428eb14 86: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 106 commits new 7698554a73 87: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new feff9c3eed 88: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 18afc9f239 89: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ff5637c5df 90: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 069047c81b 91: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] new da270eb7ff 92: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 43ba63ae06 93: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] new 72f2f98a73 94: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 63 commits new 136b5f9d17 95: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new c16279b2a6 96: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 05c0e55022 97: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 821709f600 98: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 936a93e51d 99: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 389a6c7d0a 100: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new ddbd7296df 101: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new fad7ea7368 102: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new aaba0009a0 103: force: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 4220943646 104: force: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new da4b6e3bce 105: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new fc0cde9777 106: onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 4267509c58 107: force: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 1dad3ec302 108: force: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 68d0b1a54f 109: force: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 015727f634 110: onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 7ef2e95f4b 111: onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new f8efe61381 112: onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new dfc3347db5 113: onsuccess: #74: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 76b251eab2 114: onsuccess: #75: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (8aebfda6dd) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2216 -> 1952 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2496 -> 2528 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27732 -> 27388 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz | Bin 17944 -> 17804 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 91160 -> 91048 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz | Bin 70092 -> 70108 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 7784 -> 7756 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 234708 -> 234956 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/make-glibc.log.xz | Bin 185892 -> 186032 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 213164 -> 212036 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz | Bin 179152 -> 178800 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 126 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 124 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4148 -> 4172 bytes 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 199 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 17724 -> 18176 bytes .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression | 1 + .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression.diff | 1 + .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement | 4 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression | 10 +- 11-update_baseline/console.log | 70 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- manifest.sh | 19 +- results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 234 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/results.csv | 395980 ++++----- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/size.csv | 468264 +++++------ results-vs-first/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2680 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3323 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 546680 ++++++------ results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 781074 +++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 30434 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 998 +- results-vs-first/interesting-symbols.csv | 134 +- results-vs-first/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-first/results-full.csv | 3235 +- results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 248 +- results-vs-first/results.csv | 248 +- results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3428 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 244 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 10 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 2852 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 3370 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 318071 +++---- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 612119 +++++++------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 25706 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 838 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2680 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3323 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 546680 ++++++------ results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 781074 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 30434 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 998 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 134 +- results-vs-prev/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/results-full.csv | 3427 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 254 +- results-vs-prev/results.csv | 254 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3860 +- results_id | 2 +- 59 files changed, 2271134 insertions(+), 2302848 deletions(-) create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.regression create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.regression.diff