This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO.

discards 3faa200b onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 1a515f45 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 2dab932d onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 444cb7aa onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 7c8379c5 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards e48bd7fa onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards caa839a6 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 711b1722 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards f724b61a onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards a9005f45 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 2a17a00e 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards e77ac9b7 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 55fcfe7b 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 053b9397 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 46d7d8c8 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 2007b92e 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 4ac7df6b 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 518ac8e1 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards d52e2fc9 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards c2ea0260 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 6f9d1b0e 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards d461052d 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 839b10b1 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards d8b39f93 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards d2cca222 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] discards 8435388a 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] discards 7f7ad5a7 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 01a89e02 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] discards 698f6635 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards c7d74c26 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 2d3c6cc2 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] discards 5e8e5abe 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards 50e2f76c 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards a9f61ba3 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] discards c7ae513b 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] discards 7ff7a475 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards f0cdfe36 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits discards d945a7db 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] discards 7a099ac8 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] discards 959a1f5f 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits discards 51e50294 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards d52b92e5 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards bba864c2 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 71ed78fa 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 28f907c2 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards e73f4f56 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards 0380c1af 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] discards 8d384d2c 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards e5c66fee 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] discards f75c2142 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 74a08267 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] discards 00b2b63f 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 08b676cf 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 6e1acc8e 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards fefb1ca3 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards dadcd781 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 1b2890fb 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 6cd8abd7 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] discards 05b2d544 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 606441dd 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 090ef80d 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] discards 1f1d35f2 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 7ddabe31 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 4800ef36 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] discards e6e07e3e 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] discards 86a63f9e 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards 05c17b1f 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 8d257e4a 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] discards 7bef9e4e 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards 61d1f468 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 141d0a4b 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] discards 5115f087 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits discards 2c5c98de 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards ce372f39 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits discards 9eb23a8a 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] discards 0188b5ba 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards ad829b04 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 9cb53736 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards 84e2269b 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards b9cd6859 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 286a07ce 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards b743f02d 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 8ee3640a 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 96e5ed8a 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 13af6022 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 9f9fb4c0 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards 5ea155b6 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] discards ba4669c0 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards f9d0f38d 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits discards e3b561d7 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] discards b794ff26 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards 31ca76fd 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits discards dcf2a6dc 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards fee63548 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards f78cbff0 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] discards 1cb8accf 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits discards ad1f2c85 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 39a24b4c 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 5acc9218 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards cfe43e94 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] discards e3e38c8f 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 55a18b52 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 67faca39 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards c7f16070 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 3186a59e onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 05b7384a 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 8f56c4c6 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 43d9d891 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 0764d1a9 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] new e7497217 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 03c937d9 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e58f0969 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 2026712c 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits new f1918e4a 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] new 8c6e0c60 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new e78f0d8e 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new a66cced8 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits new dd15c961 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new 57e0ec24 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] new 09335cc9 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits new 8633b600 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new 50ee4eae 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new 9ad2c475 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 7300a635 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 7be408ee 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 4a68ef47 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new f5268cee 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 8760b1b4 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 6ec2a77e 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new f89f0b35 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 0be2f13c 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new 08713eea 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new d08b36df 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 3ee79f97 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] new 027665f3 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new 19b29261 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 87330c33 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits new 4401cd46 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new ac337f64 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 3da2fc62 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 7d0c3ad2 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new 801c50f8 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 906ebd76 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new b365f911 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] new 88684564 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] new 715d011c 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new a47b4e3a 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 40ba1d27 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new ffbe045e 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new c2179cbd 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 090e77ac 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] new 95b389d5 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new aa1ddc96 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new c09a8aff 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 80bbb7aa 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 774e5724 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new e218ee03 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 908e7907 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] new 437476ce 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new c7009dcb 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new 04d7be53 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new c0779a9e 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] new 28fffb46 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 533bdfe3 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new a5f17b34 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new cc278070 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new cba91982 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 024c341d 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new 8787ecfe 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new 164a299e 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] new a6804095 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] new 93168567 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits new 8e868ee0 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 87030d9f 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new 1722f329 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] new 2cf06e68 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new d370a194 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new f014dd95 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new eb7b2d0c 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] new c47603cd 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new 92608296 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new a93857b6 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 0520235f 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new febf2393 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new 75991726 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 18df0137 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 79982438 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 14cd6a48 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 9d5245fd 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 80dc73f9 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new b53a5f3b 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 7e3600a0 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 3f4994a7 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 5e314a64 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 69f13ec5 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 4dc4ee8e 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new f98656f4 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 3194515f 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 7bce55ef onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 36a94be2 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 0267999e onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 50f4fe55 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 6b7c70e9 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 87615d5a onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new b84ec43b onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new b6219425 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new f2a627e6 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new a0e33b00 onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (3faa200b) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 104 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: