This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-aarch64-master-O2_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-aarch64-master-O2_LTO.

discards df7e2a07 onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 32557612 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 83dc0d6b onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards bdb69bed onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards eb6a6134 onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 17159278 onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 312c687a onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards dcfcc987 onsuccess: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards f5207f5c onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards a9f25739 onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 2ec4c6b8 onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards efd855c9 onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards d40802ad onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 968cbdc1 onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards c654a146 onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards fe677d60 onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 51258c38 onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 258a146d force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] discards 3c347102 force: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] discards 42f4e82f 83: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards d8fac941 82: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards aadb2d16 81: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 8057f0f3 80: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 81c8b635 79: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 475dd7a6 78: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 7b8c0d34 77: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 0e042acc 76: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards a8b0dd95 75: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 2a2f2922 74: force: #19: milc_base.default [...] discards a98b57aa 73: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 42153e1e 72: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 466639f9 71: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after llvm: 456 commits discards 8cdc7a8b 70: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after llvm: 892 commits discards 0347b7eb 69: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 364 commits discards afe2cecd 68: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 227 commits discards dbbd2c67 67: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 365 commits discards 1ec7e614 66: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 400 commits discards a222d199 65: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 263 commits discards 777ca0a0 64: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 403 commits discards 57b8a526 63: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 87 commits discards 09eb4537 62: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 536 commits discards 25f76211 61: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 616 commits discards e3672f51 60: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards b5f88604 59: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 89df5cf2 58: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards aa167c8a 57: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards c084f6ed 56: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 9f533d69 55: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 636f9009 54: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -6% [...] discards 0f3ebcfa 53: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards eb8c8d56 52: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 128 commits discards 88821fef 51: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 4% af [...] discards ad476e4e 50: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 253 commits discards 3b8890d4 49: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% af [...] discards e4168f3b 48: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 243 commits discards e5c221cd 47: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards ae105aec 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 688da6ca 45: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards ad0e1dc9 44: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 3a125697 43: onsuccess: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards c3d65d58 42: onsuccess: #538: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards ac2ee212 41: onsuccess: #537: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 971f3e3c 40: onsuccess: #527: 1: [TCWG CI] 403.gcc run OK after binuti [...] discards 5ce8165c 39: onsuccess: #525: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards e2fa5ee9 38: force: #519: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after working-4297-gf [...] discards 04df1f8e 37: onsuccess: #517: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 50db8216 36: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 325 commits discards 11747d9c 35: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] 403.gcc failed to run after llv [...] discards 79e98202 34: force: #513: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 56 commits discards 4303059d 33: onsuccess: #510: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 7972503b 32: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp speeds up by -4 [...] discards 61ef6716 31: onsuccess: #507: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] discards 05a4124e 30: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...] discards aa5b19df 29: onsuccess: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] discards fddc2239 28: onsuccess: #502: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 2dd6d4f4 27: onsuccess: #501: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench speeds up by [...] discards c9ec1ee6 26: onsuccess: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 4ae9b4c4 25: onsuccess: #499: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench speeds up by [...] discards 55f15cd4 24: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 67278dab 23: onsuccess: #497: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 39f4970c 22: onsuccess: #494: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 838580c7 21: force: #493: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 0d3285a9 20: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 338c1e4a 19: onsuccess: #489: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 1089471c 18: onsuccess: #488: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 23b5f3c1 17: onsuccess: #487: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer built and run OK [...] discards d697c2ae 16: onsuccess: #486: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 853e9439 15: onsuccess: #485: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards a395dfa9 14: onsuccess: #484: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 547d98dc 13: onsuccess: #483: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 714 commits discards 822759ca 12: force: #482: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray failed to build afte [...] discards fb16221e 11: onsuccess: #480: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards ce867fa9 10: force: #476: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 speeds up by -4% af [...] discards a789fe91 9: onsuccess: #473: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards f4d43ec6 8: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] discards 848ea4be 7: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 11 commits discards 5f570775 6: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 17 commits discards 6fa680cb 5: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] discards b92984e4 4: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/linux/gl [...] discards d7e9bf1e 3: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc-llvm: 1 discards 2a9e0923 2: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc-llvm: 1 new bce1f363 onsuccess: #454: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 79b3817f 3: onsuccess: binutils-gcc-linux-glibc-llvm: 1 new 710fb461 4: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/linux/gl [...] new e81ba03b 5: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] new d705c923 6: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 17 commits new 8ad8bba4 7: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 11 commits new 3528784f 8: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linux [...] new aecb8dcf 9: onsuccess: #473: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 8dc50b41 10: force: #476: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 speeds up by -4% af [...] new f6a4edaa 11: onsuccess: #480: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 0e7443c4 12: force: #482: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray failed to build afte [...] new 997a1cad 13: onsuccess: #483: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 714 commits new 0a86a2ae 14: onsuccess: #484: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 51b11f36 15: onsuccess: #485: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 06fffd1b 16: onsuccess: #486: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 76dbc7a0 17: onsuccess: #487: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer built and run OK [...] new b31b94b6 18: onsuccess: #488: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 11cf3ab5 19: onsuccess: #489: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 7ea100f7 20: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new dd0e4901 21: force: #493: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new a02256a1 22: onsuccess: #494: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b670cae7 23: onsuccess: #497: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new f72b18cc 24: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 2700ec8b 25: onsuccess: #499: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench speeds up by [...] new 07d6396f 26: onsuccess: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b88cbd38 27: onsuccess: #501: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench speeds up by [...] new b7c86e3e 28: onsuccess: #502: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new a0594f1b 29: onsuccess: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] new 8ccb42ce 30: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...] new d86ece6d 31: onsuccess: #507: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new 653442b4 32: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp speeds up by -4 [...] new 94384acc 33: onsuccess: #510: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 8a2d3184 34: force: #513: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 56 commits new c96a0851 35: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] 403.gcc failed to run after llv [...] new d6fc3aaf 36: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 325 commits new 7d7a9c28 37: onsuccess: #517: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 78815d95 38: force: #519: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after working-4297-gf [...] new c57b3ecf 39: onsuccess: #525: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new dfbd1b86 40: onsuccess: #527: 1: [TCWG CI] 403.gcc run OK after binuti [...] new ea9e0ff1 41: onsuccess: #537: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e5a463e2 42: onsuccess: #538: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 3be2a1b9 43: onsuccess: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 8f82a4ee 44: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 4540db68 45: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 297531b6 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new c507e086 47: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 08a750d0 48: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 243 commits new 3c496915 49: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% af [...] new d4d478a0 50: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 253 commits new d773ee61 51: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 4% af [...] new c017f67e 52: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 128 commits new 55410373 53: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new b484c26e 54: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -6% [...] new 93d8dd6a 55: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 6e48c9d3 56: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 475faddd 57: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 78f28edf 58: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new ca378694 59: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new c2200202 60: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new f2f67c1d 61: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 616 commits new f13ddec4 62: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 536 commits new ee215ddd 63: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 87 commits new c7bce47e 64: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 403 commits new 8dc62db2 65: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 263 commits new 7abf046c 66: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 400 commits new c9fdda77 67: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 365 commits new 7994303b 68: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 227 commits new d7c3ec90 69: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 364 commits new f09062b5 70: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after llvm: 892 commits new d96fbc45 71: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after llvm: 456 commits new c01710c9 72: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 9558dfdf 73: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 6ce126fb 74: force: #19: milc_base.default [...] new 87c220ff 75: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 1df15cd6 76: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new f6703d48 77: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 1124787f 78: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new c2ff2c08 79: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 1f0deb42 80: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new dad7fcf1 81: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new f8dee301 82: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new dfbd6a85 83: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 41a69c47 force: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] new af2b816e force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk-c [...] new d360ea94 onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new fef1d134 onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new d3cc3892 onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 74c0b3bb onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new bedf9cf7 onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new b6f733f6 onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 916bbe6b onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 773d2a60 onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 20a79785 onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new f6a7ae56 onsuccess: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 874a8cc6 onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 33ecf731 onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 84d12d80 onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 5a66be55 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new be4820b9 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 98d14c27 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new c281cf96 onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (df7e2a07) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/l [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 101 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: