This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-aarch64-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.

discards a375c4931b onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 41bad25971 onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 42e0608a75 107: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 61be83200a 106: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 889b9fca25 105: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 0c587896a7 104: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards f7ea88f688 103: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 305e6f3afc 102: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards bd228e7774 101: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 23066ba498 100: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards d2b1064aef 99: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards ddef72847b 98: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards cbf020bf8a 97: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards dc05515791 96: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 59602d5000 95: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 483d1cc83a 94: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards d99eb47e72 93: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards c34ce9d9cc 92: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 3f5a4d7c5b 91: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards f30fa281f1 90: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 69a57aed95 89: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 29841152d3 88: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 09ae0a2ab4 87: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD speeds up by -5 [...] discards 2dc9456570 86: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards d4fbb65f33 85: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 19d20b74a6 84: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards c721bcb64c 83: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 15edfe2d31 82: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards b1693aaf11 81: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 133 commits discards ac641e9a2c 80: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards d5f2b13b11 79: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards f565da8e1b 78: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 7598e629dd 77: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 22e327fcf0 76: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 01a15820f7 75: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 46c8642b4e 74: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 676 commits discards d72a124992 73: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 35 commits discards cf4d9ee075 72: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 517 commits discards 36049304b5 71: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 [...] discards 369621426f 70: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits discards 96cf52e7bc 69: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits discards ceff4ba3cf 68: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards e05f8da649 67: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1704 [...] discards 95fbf5d2fb 66: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run OK [...] discards bda27f7b97 65: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK af [...] discards 0229c6560a 64: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards a5149a7f6f 63: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards 0589e6ef0d 62: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 10 [...] discards 4737b33fe7 61: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards f618224e8d 60: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 2629cc30cb 59: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards c95c07bdf8 58: onsuccess: #461: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards fe38fc4cd7 57: onsuccess: #460: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 198 commits discards 854b90ac93 56: force: #459: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray slowed down by 5% a [...] discards 2dee0a6df9 55: force: #457: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards b67547e0e4 54: force: #455: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 141 commits discards 8f06e3bc32 53: onsuccess: #454: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 617 [...] discards 415db8af0d 52: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 7a1107c4de 51: onsuccess: #443: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 9deac1931e 50: onsuccess: #441: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards decf3171eb 49: onsuccess: #440: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards b0e62b6158 48: onsuccess: #439: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards e4c251ec54 47: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 6990389d3b 46: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 64eed876ee 45: onsuccess: #436: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 231 commits discards d872b3485e 44: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 53f38c99d9 43: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 417 [...] discards d8dcc872b6 42: force: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.7-149-gac [...] discards e4fe499b6a 41: force: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD slowed down by 6% [...] discards f85346f2ce 40: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 4 commits discards 21ee20ff3e 39: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 490751ab5b 38: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 208cfda9c6 37: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD speeds up by [...] discards 1ab78ec804 36: force: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] 454.calculix slowed down by 10 [...] discards 6aad56b44d 35: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 24 commits discards 5a126c545a 34: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 122 [...] discards 44e389f3a6 33: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD speeds up by [...] discards 36354ef078 32: onsuccess: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards d8d719d3fe 31: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards bbf9821d12 30: onsuccess: #409: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 823f3ff18e 29: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 84 commits discards 0b1c0dbe25 28: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits discards 2e1c3368f0 27: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 184 commits discards 1c7ea79874 26: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards afa2c8c9f9 25: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp speeds up by - [...] discards 32e7ff4abc 24: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD slowed down by 5% [...] discards ace8727787 23: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 216 commits discards 4aba3d9d50 22: onsuccess: #391: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 795792d7cd 21: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 33e9bb4bb2 20: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.11-3 [...] discards 162f5a3d5e 19: onsuccess: #386: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 17 commits discards 3b488457d7 18: onsuccess: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 78 commits discards 01c2fed2d3 17: onsuccess: #384: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards cc37378fd9 16: onsuccess: #382: 1: [TCWG CI] 403.gcc built and run OK a [...] discards e53f4b50b5 15: onsuccess: #380: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards d6faad8413 14: onsuccess: #378: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 20 commits discards fedf709f64 13: force: #377: 1: [TCWG CI] 403.gcc failed to build after [...] discards 8c27be8257 12: force: #376: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] discards 226d3632a2 11: onsuccess: #375: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards ff872eb585 10: onsuccess: #374: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 0694074079 10: onsuccess: #374: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 04d5b6172d 11: onsuccess: #375: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 1f3cedd261 12: force: #376: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] new ee5107967f 13: force: #377: 1: [TCWG CI] 403.gcc failed to build after [...] new 6df3e4eb21 14: onsuccess: #378: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 20 commits new ffd551bcd3 15: onsuccess: #380: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 1d05d3d547 16: onsuccess: #382: 1: [TCWG CI] 403.gcc built and run OK a [...] new 1a3d5aa543 17: onsuccess: #384: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 9fddafd03d 18: onsuccess: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 78 commits new 48b2f1ae81 19: onsuccess: #386: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 17 commits new 1a45fe621b 20: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.11-3 [...] new edefd9bdda 21: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new bfa1d9b85b 22: onsuccess: #391: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new a142c2d76f 23: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 216 commits new eed7f6fa37 24: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD slowed down by 5% [...] new e554419521 25: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp speeds up by - [...] new 228975c250 26: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 913cc4eeeb 27: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 184 commits new 2ca6b97844 28: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits new 35f8babf44 29: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 84 commits new 9d5078bf0a 30: onsuccess: #409: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 3c9ed981d8 31: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 1f82b11d77 32: onsuccess: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 0888ae9cfd 33: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD speeds up by [...] new 3666382193 34: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 122 [...] new 01e7d417ad 35: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 24 commits new 797e4ace85 36: force: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] 454.calculix slowed down by 10 [...] new a955fc9a18 37: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD speeds up by [...] new 7b9bb7488c 38: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 3dd802a1ea 39: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new cf2db3bc35 40: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 4 commits new e14ef01f4c 41: force: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD slowed down by 6% [...] new 0edb891d6b 42: force: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.7-149-gac [...] new 79e4d5b5d7 43: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 417 [...] new 4a5707838b 44: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 25e3504fdd 45: onsuccess: #436: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 231 commits new 12881458a7 46: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 153329e1ae 47: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 54df07f142 48: onsuccess: #439: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 62436c505d 49: onsuccess: #440: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 6912b5b7bf 50: onsuccess: #441: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new e6c2db92c3 51: onsuccess: #443: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 77fcd259d4 52: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 8abe4b8548 53: onsuccess: #454: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 617 [...] new 09be4d474c 54: force: #455: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 141 commits new 28ec8b4cd9 55: force: #457: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new e8a7725290 56: force: #459: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray slowed down by 5% a [...] new 0a0a2e6e0d 57: onsuccess: #460: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 198 commits new 4fc45a6136 58: onsuccess: #461: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new a169bf64d7 59: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new a74623977f 60: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 3e8d709fff 61: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 36fff3e7e1 62: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 10 [...] new ad5c3fd5fd 63: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new ecede7ea0c 64: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new f0aaa4f9b0 65: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK af [...] new 3abb45d33a 66: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run OK [...] new 3255c324fe 67: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1704 [...] new b451f24cac 68: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 48679e9619 69: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits new 840c8416c9 70: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits new 8a6b1a4938 71: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 [...] new 1ca1b2668f 72: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 517 commits new 3cbeb27289 73: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 35 commits new 075dc1e518 74: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 676 commits new ddcf4fa143 75: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 0a5f7d9fde 76: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e91532b2af 77: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 96a76b1c18 78: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 71ed0b3c2c 79: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b6d87aacea 80: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new a128834873 81: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 133 commits new a9e42787c5 82: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 84de0a8d5e 83: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new f41fd21e99 84: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 194506f31c 85: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new abad81358d 86: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new da68112e80 87: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD speeds up by -5 [...] new 6df744ac6a 88: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new d8692ca908 89: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 99ea717fbc 90: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new db2cad01c5 91: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 6a03462f1b 92: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new db9df03997 93: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 0f0d04673f 94: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 63045701b4 95: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 02818dcffd 96: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 3183fb5ce5 97: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 16949e9184 98: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 2edabbf6c6 99: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new fb7ee61893 100: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 63cc8e6133 101: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new c7247d98a7 102: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new d06ced201a 103: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 832ff6c340 104: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new e020700c53 105: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 326155c1ba 106: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 387050d015 107: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 3e1c40cddf onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 960d41e39f onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 3058195a5e onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (a375c4931b) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 101 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2240 -> 2360 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2660 -> 2604 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 28752 -> 27364 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz | Bin 18268 -> 17864 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 72620 -> 72700 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz | Bin 52792 -> 52860 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 364 -> 364 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 8060 -> 8800 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 244348 -> 244348 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/make-glibc.log.xz | Bin 194816 -> 194344 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 177704 -> 177476 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz | Bin 146012 -> 146480 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 118 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 116 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4100 -> 4076 bytes 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 6620 -> 7036 bytes .../output-bmk-results/diff-bmk-results.out | 1 + .../output-bmk-results/exe.improvement | 1 + .../{diff-bmk-results.out => exe.improvement.diff} | 0 git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- git/linux_rev | 2 +- jenkins/build-name | 2 +- manifest.sh | 31 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 87 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 1 - results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 36 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 168 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 745670 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 744828 +++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 20042 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 4386 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 44 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 165 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 728232 +++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 741949 +++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 20560 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 4263 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-full.csv | 189 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-internal.csv | 82 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results.csv | 82 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 2 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 82 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3518 +- results_id | 2 +- 47 files changed, 1493589 insertions(+), 1521144 deletions(-) create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.improvement copy 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/{diff-bmk-results.out => exe.improveme [...]