This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO.

discards 36a24a983 onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards d54eb05cb onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards f66526178 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards e6a0642a2 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards c5cf4ffd5 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 4b3535d4d onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards d437650b8 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 5d16d2e20 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 78ddb7e55 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards c3cce2171 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards add24b270 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 810349222 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 1de7fbd02 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards c191cecfc 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards f0ab054a5 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 026edfa44 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards edecb0860 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 1ec4bb593 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 66c82e57d 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards b3e3322db 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards d7dc16b8e 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 282f40891 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 28ca43f1b 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards ce092158a 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards db9adc711 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] discards 9f1b4fe55 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] discards ced52ee6f 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards b37445ac4 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] discards 86eb543ac 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 8155e1a68 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 2540bd842 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] discards 3b5795246 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards 47f626d15 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 6cee11e92 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] discards beeb62180 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] discards 97202e999 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards a171d4777 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits discards bacbc786a 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] discards 0732ad200 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] discards 1c36e0301 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits discards 441a5aee0 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards 7dd8cbcac 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards b31555996 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards fdb63a7a1 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 82199bf70 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards a4a4e8b3f 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards bafc3f721 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] discards eb570d440 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 2f86fb441 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] discards e4e472200 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 0353f26bf 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] discards e08491124 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards b621a14d6 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 2f6f90f8d 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards ffda2efaf 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards eb62dd9a4 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 65e16d8aa 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 291bd552a 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] discards 2330868de 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 12f094bea 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 20cb83489 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] discards 41a4a0176 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards c10e4e984 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 83c273d0b 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] discards 6e68b03a9 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] discards 577eb8aac 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards 4f35e5b43 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 7739847b9 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] discards eb106b109 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards 25732c2f4 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 0c8a725fa 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] discards f4c5b5ea5 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits discards 15e76c191 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards 3e01115bf 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits discards 7bf0bca02 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] discards e2e35d37f 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards f466618d3 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards d7802cf99 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards e52c3148a 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 2a131bc3e 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards b2d1dda05 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards fc09d8326 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards ff789903d 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 658fa77c3 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards ef63827a3 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 24f8e6d76 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards 8f6475d68 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] discards 0f398724a 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards 31d9f65a2 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits discards d7c8f4f42 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] discards b86bdb22a 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new f93da27ec onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new a01aaa052 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] new 635bd70bb 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits new a87a32f0c 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new c23893b44 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new 20151f835 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new dd17e1a10 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 38454437e 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 098056b7d 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b1c99723b 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ea94c4af7 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 4a24193e1 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 72ebbdeae 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new cbc44af13 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new 2234d3e2e 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new b6a058d75 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 3fe29828a 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] new ef8a95931 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new e807a648a 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new fbe915885 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits new e17df5c3e 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new eeb50097e 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new b93f89442 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new b0476ef4c 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new fd243f958 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 63edeba3a 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new d0848d91f 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] new 8b4a00298 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] new 96eff8b3a 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new fb09b5c5c 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 2861f54eb 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new 2df60ddce 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new c731e3bf0 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new f65931464 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] new 88aca4cec 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 72f1b5a53 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 6e2a4d175 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 6e3548d21 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 13c25ba50 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 895149af9 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 569665041 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] new f942721fb 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 7b45516b5 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new ee4673950 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new bf53e9001 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] new f096b06dd 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 097ea976b 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 1113ba92f 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new fed3903fc 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 09cfc7afd 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new ad8b68fe9 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new f26c4e1cb 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new d5f734cd5 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] new 0ba046ae8 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] new eeafe91ed 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits new 387640b98 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new d3bbe938f 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new 4c380a968 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] new 6903cfb16 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 9125fbeaf 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 184ca0deb 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new 7e07c922f 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] new c1684b0f1 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new dc87bade1 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new c44d18b67 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 75d4ad74d 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new 04111ba77 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new 1a1f8a980 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new e66bd786e 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new a52430443 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 31d25e00c 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 02ef705a5 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new d44f22afb 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 290b4694e 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 762fb2ab3 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 831c09458 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 4dd81dd8e 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 99cd8672a 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 95e845f73 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new e9363434d 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new f8a569bd9 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 0b1ef7cc4 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 2c975f6d5 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new c3fa0cff8 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new f34eef05d onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new a53802fd5 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new bc835c72b onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 836f9c399 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 21ac3ec98 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new a80776056 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 625be2280 onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (36a24a983) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 91 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: