This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO.

discards 1b6b5117a onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 4a621acbd onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 60533cf89 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 72483466e onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 985c71367 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 56756dcf6 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 5e4580763 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards a419fdfd5 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards a910fce1e onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards e44661e6a onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 1b712a5a2 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards e3427a640 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 7c553134e 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards f8aca1b27 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards d32b863ad 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards b039cbf5a 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards c6e625ac2 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards aa5032bca 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 512a83a06 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards a6cf289ab 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 4577e76a6 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 7097f606e 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 1422d88b3 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards d45595527 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 533eb40b7 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] discards cc6793383 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] discards 0acf50d97 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 001028791 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] discards 2653dba12 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 601d9797c 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 4c08e2dbc 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] discards 4e6b96de7 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards 0572c144f 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards c24f0e3a2 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] discards f6a94dd97 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] discards 877f8cbb8 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards 271e1be43 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits discards 9e62c15b9 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] discards 137aba35b 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] discards 859ed98c3 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits discards 9bce5d3c3 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards 345f4a411 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards 670d84464 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 2fc107008 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards e0fd118f8 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards aa26aa443 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards f67961d7e 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] discards 3b28066c9 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 16a6851fe 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] discards a5769b6c6 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 32fb08190 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] discards 55a9bbf78 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 7eff08084 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 856114435 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards e4c49afd4 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards d208a168a 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards bb09ab14e 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards c3a544f2d 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] discards 3f6888771 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards b1a75d37a 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards afbab4c6c 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] discards 0fc93806d 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards cfe6791e1 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards d3ef646ca 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] discards 9abe4b317 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] discards 1e584405b 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards 7069af15e 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards aaa120a98 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] discards 3655d8dc4 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards 759251c73 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards ee486cda8 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] discards 56288f736 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits discards e72edd2ee 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards f9cdfc39e 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits discards 2fa19b445 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] discards 2a19298f1 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards bd9e7649a 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards eff798ad8 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards 8fffd679c 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 2e2cb72bd 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards f8670bb59 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 322f34558 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 64b611db5 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 12bc75297 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards daabbd144 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 145457625 onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 700a210a5 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new f3573c236 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 7d543b96d 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new c5b327a17 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 526ce77a3 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 1890cab56 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 9996def92 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new 19c965370 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 94cc36663 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 2bf9912ed 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] new e3611e0a5 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new b45186457 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 6620827cb 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits new 9f7b3a010 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new 8d2b8d3b6 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new e0c57494d 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new fbb707af7 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new fa50e0b70 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 7a1453d53 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new b47141ff3 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] new 133bbd043 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] new d7456d395 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 4ba7e3633 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new d6d5b17c2 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new 3f3c66110 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new a7bd4d037 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 7860ec46e 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] new 4a82f094d 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new e210ed2a5 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 5c4eaf1d5 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new e9b33dc13 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new eefd4f2dc 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 3265191b2 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new da7ab1a44 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] new 8562a6235 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new d5a0abf8d 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new 0fa8dcf01 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 53be4523f 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] new d940c4c6b 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new ddb096cfa 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 9ca76ea72 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new a21ff0493 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 3d4687c3c 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 77739ab83 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new 841ade6f9 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new f5bc97d6e 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] new 882fd713f 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] new fabf702d0 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits new 8cf366454 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 52bb541b9 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new 9be7392ee 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] new a89dd516f 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 0da8f420b 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 88170bc88 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new 469b59b62 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] new f74f358f6 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new 66b62616b 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new 9bd2a711b 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 33933dc43 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new 428c9e683 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new 610d4799b 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new d62a6bf13 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new ef59fc39c 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new be21decf4 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 64e56a1ec 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 3ec4b74af 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new b6dd18905 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 793520638 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 57383d10d 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new cd28ca0b9 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new b8f50c24d 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 2755a627e 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new e188b345e 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 266e58fbb 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 3da86fb52 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new df94bd4eb onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new cbbed5e36 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new ecadd8400 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 60e4d0707 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new e8992f48f onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 267654abe onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new fe3d6ec5a onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 5b9e7ec41 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 5b3c29de7 onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (1b6b5117a) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 85 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: