This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O3 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O3.

discards 26c21ee7 onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards d5d1763f onsuccess: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 1acf8d62 onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 1445c72c onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards a63b1807 onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 99b6fef7 69: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 440c456b 68: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards caa479f2 67: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards d5f93517 66: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 3d5700e5 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 8f98f599 64: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 2e0b5ee4 63: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards f5421dca 62: force: #21: : [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bm [...] discards dea9cfd5 61: force: #18: [.] strcmp [...] discards bea9d54f 60: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 2cd0a8dd 59: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] discards 189b7af9 58: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards a8b1b4ae 57: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 19db2b63 56: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 7ff4e8f2 55: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards f1d74b5e 54: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 5a915d2c 53: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards aaeec24c 52: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 293 commits discards 4c594308 51: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-17-init- [...] discards 8ac22c30 50: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 61 commits discards 6eace83f 49: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards e08d9d64 48: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 476cdbf9 47: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 12cfe9da 46: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 6cd55b16 45: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 0451b06e 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 603 commits discards 1de8f251 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 356b1db9 42: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards c852be7a 41: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 2173d497 40: onsuccess: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards daf27939 39: onsuccess: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -7 [...] discards 45c41f15 38: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards eb3fd273 37: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 37db471d 36: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 0498bb75 35: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 13fd5d1f 34: onsuccess: #404: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 663a144c 33: onsuccess: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.9-4167 [...] discards 4336c961 32: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...] discards 4de20edc 31: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 78 commits discards 3c4592fb 30: onsuccess: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 [...] discards e1055fdf 29: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 958 commits discards b56891ca 28: onsuccess: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 79d6c08d 27: force: #393: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 45fd0efe 26: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] discards d3a9462a 25: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 623 commits discards 97b3c239 24: force: #386: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% a [...] discards a3010320 23: force: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 939 commits discards 5bc1b54d 22: onsuccess: #383: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards c0809bf2 21: force: #381: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 0d7a8994 20: onsuccess: #379: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards b39a09c6 19: force: #377: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards be8677d3 18: onsuccess: #375: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 035734ed 17: onsuccess: #370: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards e678d793 16: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1752 [...] discards 0c29d51c 15: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 179 commits discards 219713b4 14: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...] discards 8133a95a 13: onsuccess: #361: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 6bb75bac 12: onsuccess: #360: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 257 commits discards 1f57d302 11: onsuccess: #359: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 24a2e956 10: onsuccess: #357: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 1f721be3 9: onsuccess: #356: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -4% [...] discards dadd4bf6 8: onsuccess: #355: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 31 commits discards be5bd5ed 7: force: #354: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% af [...] discards e4b78384 6: force: #353: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 179 commits discards d3729fd9 5: onsuccess: #351: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer built and run OK a [...] discards 868dd11a 4: onsuccess: #349: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 1565 commits discards 6dbb842a 3: force: #348: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray failed to build after [...] new b226a174 force: #348: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk_ [...] new b822456f 4: onsuccess: #349: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 1565 commits new 63e1de88 5: onsuccess: #351: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer built and run OK a [...] new 358b1f42 6: force: #353: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 179 commits new 6ecdb2d7 7: force: #354: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% af [...] new 656fa6d5 8: onsuccess: #355: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 31 commits new b443f7b3 9: onsuccess: #356: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -4% [...] new 8042864f 10: onsuccess: #357: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 088c0910 11: onsuccess: #359: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 6de18bec 12: onsuccess: #360: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 257 commits new e6f86fd4 13: onsuccess: #361: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new a75de7b3 14: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...] new bc35b8b6 15: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 179 commits new d9385e1f 16: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1752 [...] new 9085c56c 17: onsuccess: #370: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e93a677b 18: onsuccess: #375: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 9e933bfe 19: force: #377: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new e61cd3a9 20: onsuccess: #379: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b0a4ae6f 21: force: #381: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new e26c0871 22: onsuccess: #383: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 52818f02 23: force: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 939 commits new df463f4d 24: force: #386: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% a [...] new b6807288 25: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 623 commits new 8ff78eb1 26: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new 2e2ffedd 27: force: #393: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 30f693f9 28: onsuccess: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ee93734e 29: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 958 commits new 0755c36e 30: onsuccess: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 [...] new b5d6285a 31: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 78 commits new 9d545686 32: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...] new a735af28 33: onsuccess: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.9-4167 [...] new 0609b478 34: onsuccess: #404: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 50941ff6 35: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 03b07218 36: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new da5a79cc 37: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e092c4a1 38: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new acac9b05 39: onsuccess: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -7 [...] new 3e91d850 40: onsuccess: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 6cf2c999 41: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 18297f11 42: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 8322c8cb 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 97870945 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 603 commits new de758185 45: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 990681c3 46: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 9ecbda53 47: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 0538098b 48: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 8ed7169b 49: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new f10b18d2 50: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 61 commits new 49b91b06 51: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-17-init- [...] new 2ead0359 52: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 293 commits new 4c5b70dc 53: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 176c2603 54: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 134c4d70 55: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new f8418af4 56: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 87b87969 57: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 6f39bf90 58: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 5cfb09d0 59: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new e22413ba 60: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 65982dcf 61: force: #18: [.] strcmp [...] new 1550ae30 62: force: #21: : [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bm [...] new 2dffae42 63: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new a0c19cca 64: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 44b7fd95 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 5216868e 66: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 491cdfb4 67: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 5d83cb24 68: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 14884ba4 69: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 4e3f0a88 onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 9a2f7b91 onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 6f1bc48f onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 744e6fc7 onsuccess: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 9b860cd8 onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (26c21ee7) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/l [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 72 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: