This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.

discards 5541ad7bb6 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards b74f24b539 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards baecb0f131 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 736f5295ca 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 79ad491da5 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards ff4fd7a64f 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 0897ab2f6b 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 65e5fc8da3 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards ca4d3f7d90 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 2c0fbd1c50 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards d2533881f9 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 7b08875a8e 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards feba0b9db8 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 83b59f228d 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 5393788800 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards f86a2b49fc 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: n [...] discards cd783d94b9 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards dbfe860b97 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards f1c80ba89e 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 503ed78e5e 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% [...] discards 103f630e55 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% [...] discards f16b47f954 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 3b508b3f9c 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 293b03fc51 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% a [...] discards d277f972c0 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] discards 5025c26d41 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards a760de18af 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 [...] discards 39b36d46fa 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] discards 4e2c877dd3 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% af [...] discards 8758000721 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits discards 1382c657af 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards 7e799c13c9 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards cf17dce415 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 0e5fc1ed6e 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 1ad68ac263 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards c858c5f4f2 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards d9ff0ae69e 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 9a59714012 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 24466a06ff 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] discards a8f99689da 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 8a5bb51906 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK afte [...] discards 31ab33f2a8 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 54cebf5afe 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] discards 51f0b133c5 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 02cca38e9a 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards 9ad5d17adf 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards c82cea5dca 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] discards 545c7e3866 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards 65caa598dd 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build afte [...] discards 9f006ff494 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards 45b03a5524 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] discards b16a09aefd 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards fd6e9961ac 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards ae1f99e4a0 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gd [...] discards 11d7754841 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 7b8100dcb9 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards fe22ce72f3 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build afte [...] discards b87f720e46 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bu [...] discards 438b7f4b85 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after [...] discards 7c0c6505ae 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] discards e5d06d4ba9 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] discards 82b7ec8a7c 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 [...] discards f6954a4f38 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] discards f29092f0ad 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits discards 7d8e1d83d0 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-41 [...] discards b5eac740c2 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] discards fec9bcf567 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards f601fed4dd 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] discards df92767128 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 5c364cae79 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 02f03b5777 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 8f9650c239 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards f7d46ab8e9 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards d0aa89f902 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 79c2cf3d90 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards a2b80e58a5 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 88a1ff5478 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-416 [...] discards 69e6a77936 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards 8a72a13dc8 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits discards 6720bb8d0c 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 563c82a479 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards 298e9bf362 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits discards f3e7c1be51 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards f9ed3e48ba 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 6602859d62 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-416 [...] discards dec9ddd5cf 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits discards 38c52eec11 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 11dc8f5a5d 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 7b81f89577 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards bee94181ea 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6 [...] discards b49fe8fc59 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards ac7988b2c6 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 7c9d476e83 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards d6cdea7101 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards e63f1be8c9 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] discards ef7fdd5433 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards e3bfc599c7 9: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards c6e2cd7972 8: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by [...] discards 25c792605d 7: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] discards 0fd26a7dd6 6: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] discards 9aa4ce6645 5: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] new 8db4b1a743 5: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] new 9c5d69a4ac 6: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] new 51ab9a759e 7: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] new 0d44b2c028 8: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by [...] new ecf17f981f 9: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 79603cc5b5 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 7f44b11574 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] new cc63f669cc 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new e3328a8f75 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new ee5e8e9ccc 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 5378c0e27c 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 28c0aab77e 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6 [...] new e898fc5cb2 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 64073e593a 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 8cd732a4b8 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 8dfca11c51 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits new 40623bf9f5 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-416 [...] new 89e13ed7da 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 46082f6b79 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 2e80b98d81 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits new abb23d831b 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new 2cc843aa55 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 3bc95a9d55 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits new 4ad4ce43be 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new ac756f0642 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-416 [...] new acfa977bc1 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 0cf834b1cf 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new f4d64b2050 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 771a97300a 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 913ea89c24 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new dd38e6c4b8 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 64ec60be4a 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new bf092ca8e3 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new dea6ba49d4 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] new c64796607b 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new bd85b00ca7 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] new 8b2c9a6d33 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-41 [...] new 2c0dd23ebe 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new a25ad64bc1 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new 8b346ceb53 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 [...] new 5a05deefdf 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] new 10fbf24a9f 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] new 4454ddc69c 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after [...] new 0841dbbb02 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bu [...] new 70a761860e 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build afte [...] new d004f33f62 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new eebd061ad0 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 8c83450d29 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gd [...] new c64d706b25 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new bc7ba166e9 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 9e024745af 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] new 2d8566c0ba 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new 820d35170f 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build afte [...] new 98106f85ce 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new e4d3e3e111 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] new b771656c41 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 9462dfd175 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new e5fc3c8ffb 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new abd6fcd3dd 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] new 7d2f21bd90 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 2ec777eaa4 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK afte [...] new a8e76fdf3e 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new cded318b83 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] new 095d10b3d3 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b98204597a 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 1b6db304a4 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 74a3a1ff90 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 8c9c9c4c41 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new a599adc5f1 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 2b31f74cc1 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 5a7584c31f 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new cf260d1483 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new ea41a526b1 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% af [...] new 45d3240fae 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new aff8003c30 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 [...] new 693dd86edb 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 6e494cb531 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] new a29a27a9d9 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% a [...] new ce83352523 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 186f0a9f84 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new dc80b516c6 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% [...] new 5f713eeffa 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% [...] new 908a7f8d30 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 4d253c0095 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 304ce3163c 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new b61314499d 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: n [...] new 6619d6a563 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 7a01d451c7 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 083af52fa2 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new c2d020168f 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 3e7e177675 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 3cd8360fe7 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new fb2a633cd5 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new fc87b079cf 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 7ecb4683d7 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new e60d546ecd 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 83a19a1d4b 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new d678167407 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 8a4c4ece56 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new ea11720fe3 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 2348e70c12 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 9608a5ed30 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (5541ad7bb6) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2360 -> 2368 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2628 -> 2644 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27632 -> 27544 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz | Bin 18048 -> 17804 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 92504 -> 90384 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz | Bin 69944 -> 69912 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 368 -> 368 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 7816 -> 8568 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 235940 -> 234100 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/make-glibc.log.xz | Bin 185808 -> 185624 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 214316 -> 212800 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz | Bin 179172 -> 179720 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 140 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 138 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4168 -> 4176 bytes 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 6628 -> 6448 bytes 11-update_baseline/console.log | 50 - git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- git/linux_rev | 2 +- jenkins/build-name | 1 + manifest.sh | 34 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 88 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 1 - results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 38 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 189 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 711516 ++++++++++---------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 716638 +++++++++++---------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 20424 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 754 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 42 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 198 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 711611 ++++++++++---------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 714125 ++++++++++---------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 20812 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 768 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-full.csv | 214 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-internal.csv | 80 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results.csv | 80 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 41 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 80 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 4266 +- results_id | 2 +- 45 files changed, 1451199 insertions(+), 1451207 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 11-update_baseline/console.log create mode 100644 jenkins/build-name