This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O3 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O3.

discards 80c9344f onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 5642ab1c onsuccess: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards c4fe303f onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards beac5f0f onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 39c240db onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards f7d4320c 69: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 3c773a14 68: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards cb0dc528 67: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards b6380dd9 66: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 7e959f1a 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards de4a995a 64: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 41315424 63: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 742d82bf 62: force: #21: : [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bm [...] discards f2907da6 61: force: #18: [.] strcmp [...] discards 951b2e12 60: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards f5e21f5b 59: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] discards 8a7e4023 58: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 8ceae474 57: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards febde160 56: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 6819e2a9 55: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 1b9c6470 54: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards dd0a821b 53: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards cef86a81 52: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 293 commits discards f91a86d6 51: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-17-init- [...] discards a632c8ee 50: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 61 commits discards 91f000ce 49: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 1e358c0d 48: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 6d9c113c 47: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards d632cb9c 46: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 3180d4ad 45: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 2791d9f1 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 603 commits discards 9de0aa83 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 48d7591a 42: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 6745d950 41: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 1f4161a9 40: onsuccess: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards bfa901c9 39: onsuccess: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -7 [...] discards 720dd071 38: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards c055156b 37: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 3e71b37f 36: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards ee40b4ab 35: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 3106b7d6 34: onsuccess: #404: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards bd4e2603 33: onsuccess: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.9-4167 [...] discards 1e1fce0f 32: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...] discards 9db67a6d 31: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 78 commits discards 91a7b5ac 30: onsuccess: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 [...] discards 260ce43c 29: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 958 commits discards 7c41d132 28: onsuccess: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards fab9b7dd 27: force: #393: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards bb4b39f5 26: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] discards ae58c186 25: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 623 commits discards 45af9811 24: force: #386: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% a [...] discards b1ca42af 23: force: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 939 commits discards a02f25e4 22: onsuccess: #383: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 5010dff4 21: force: #381: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards a4170d48 20: onsuccess: #379: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 8c217e17 19: force: #377: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 258cf078 18: onsuccess: #375: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards a6f99b12 17: onsuccess: #370: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards ead4259f 16: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1752 [...] discards ab392bd2 15: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 179 commits discards 205d34c3 14: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...] discards b399aab1 13: onsuccess: #361: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 39b31281 12: onsuccess: #360: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 257 commits discards b642daf8 11: onsuccess: #359: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 361c822b 10: onsuccess: #357: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 1a350d52 9: onsuccess: #356: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -4% [...] new 6fc0c6c4 onsuccess: #356: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 7835c244 10: onsuccess: #357: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new d7501381 11: onsuccess: #359: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 6837654b 12: onsuccess: #360: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 257 commits new 1802f7eb 13: onsuccess: #361: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 6f6a0c4a 14: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...] new 0aaa022a 15: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 179 commits new e5805381 16: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1752 [...] new c678902d 17: onsuccess: #370: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new dcf1beea 18: onsuccess: #375: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 67699fcc 19: force: #377: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 614af805 20: onsuccess: #379: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 003e7c3f 21: force: #381: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new fbaa41e3 22: onsuccess: #383: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new fca78420 23: force: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 939 commits new 0f714027 24: force: #386: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% a [...] new 6a152f49 25: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 623 commits new 62ccae6c 26: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new a48bb50b 27: force: #393: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 44967c9a 28: onsuccess: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 3b2a9547 29: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 958 commits new 60e2b794 30: onsuccess: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 [...] new e8efe0ff 31: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 78 commits new c06d3f39 32: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...] new a494e937 33: onsuccess: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.9-4167 [...] new ed3f8e6d 34: onsuccess: #404: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 26be6093 35: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 6c34ac80 36: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new d8cdc46c 37: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e742d202 38: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new a18ea2be 39: onsuccess: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -7 [...] new 151cb381 40: onsuccess: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 7a9761dc 41: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 46a3bc58 42: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new ce5406f3 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new b125d97c 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 603 commits new 25450f27 45: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new b1c31d28 46: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 95cab61d 47: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new e821a349 48: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 26b2ce9f 49: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new d8bdd7f1 50: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 61 commits new f5fbec4e 51: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-17-init- [...] new 95b85383 52: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 293 commits new 03ef92c5 53: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new fc63cacc 54: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 5536c0ee 55: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 23bbe299 56: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 093529c8 57: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 9a9d15dd 58: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 8a8832ad 59: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new 3350d4e0 60: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 9623cd74 61: force: #18: [.] strcmp [...] new a5cc226f 62: force: #21: : [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bm [...] new 588804d8 63: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new a1d8ef3e 64: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new e2b6be8b 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 8601855a 66: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 436da40b 67: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new ad3962ea 68: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new df27c065 69: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 2aa7e8b7 onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 8758489b onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 66630a83 onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new d1ea19fe onsuccess: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 28d53b93 onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (80c9344f) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/l [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 66 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: