This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O3 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/llvm-arm-master-O3.
discards 37f4a380 onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 2b900ee6 onsuccess: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 36ac4e4c onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards d5794c64 onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 01b6488c onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards b0144268 69: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards c2f455cd 68: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 3a93e00d 67: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 1d8de04a 66: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 47258483 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards a7461c9f 64: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 9e89f2c5 63: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 0aa87ca1 62: force: #21: : [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bm [...] discards 53adfdf2 61: force: #18: [.] strcmp [...] discards 393b66ce 60: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards e61e0b39 59: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] discards a164cb78 58: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 632904f0 57: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 40c784ff 56: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards a1a7086f 55: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 91741b0f 54: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 3f6d0d5f 53: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards f04b6cb9 52: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 293 commits discards 293e044e 51: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-17-init- [...] discards 56ecdcce 50: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 61 commits discards 08f1e703 49: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards b48d6777 48: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 1baac59e 47: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards bf133be7 46: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 5f6b30bf 45: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 546be5ac 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 603 commits discards 4346c7a4 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 9e202558 42: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards dcf878d2 41: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards f88b80d3 40: onsuccess: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 04d8c419 39: onsuccess: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -7 [...] discards 6f0f3a56 38: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards ce060179 37: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 580401fc 36: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards fa19be87 35: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards a19657f5 34: onsuccess: #404: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards e2f6dc8c 33: onsuccess: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.9-4167 [...] discards 61fdf27c 32: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...] discards fc5516f4 31: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 78 commits discards 4fc45611 30: onsuccess: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 [...] discards c154427e 29: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 958 commits discards 2c1c7b9b 28: onsuccess: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 155c6734 27: force: #393: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 7308dffe 26: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] discards 20c1977d 25: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 623 commits discards 05129c4e 24: force: #386: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% a [...] discards c22857d1 23: force: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 939 commits discards c28d7f35 22: onsuccess: #383: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 85f166e4 21: force: #381: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 350b0887 20: onsuccess: #379: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 08020035 19: force: #377: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 30244c74 18: onsuccess: #375: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards a0e020a9 17: onsuccess: #370: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 969db399 16: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1752 [...] discards 690c654f 15: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 179 commits discards 32683eef 14: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...] discards 117bd3ef 13: onsuccess: #361: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 86ad6b77 12: onsuccess: #360: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 257 commits discards 87cc3f22 11: onsuccess: #359: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 79189f0d 10: onsuccess: #357: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 59edd422 9: onsuccess: #356: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -4% [...] discards d1f9cfdf 8: onsuccess: #355: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 31 commits new 299e723e onsuccess: #355: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 1a350d52 9: onsuccess: #356: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -4% [...] new 361c822b 10: onsuccess: #357: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b642daf8 11: onsuccess: #359: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 39b31281 12: onsuccess: #360: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 257 commits new b399aab1 13: onsuccess: #361: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 205d34c3 14: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...] new ab392bd2 15: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 179 commits new ead4259f 16: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1752 [...] new a6f99b12 17: onsuccess: #370: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 258cf078 18: onsuccess: #375: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 8c217e17 19: force: #377: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new a4170d48 20: onsuccess: #379: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 5010dff4 21: force: #381: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new a02f25e4 22: onsuccess: #383: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b1ca42af 23: force: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 939 commits new 45af9811 24: force: #386: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref slowed down by 5% a [...] new ae58c186 25: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 623 commits new bb4b39f5 26: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new fab9b7dd 27: force: #393: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 7c41d132 28: onsuccess: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 260ce43c 29: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 958 commits new 91a7b5ac 30: onsuccess: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 [...] new 9db67a6d 31: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 78 commits new 1e1fce0f 32: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36. [...] new bd4e2603 33: onsuccess: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.9-4167 [...] new 3106b7d6 34: onsuccess: #404: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ee40b4ab 35: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 3e71b37f 36: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new c055156b 37: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 720dd071 38: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new bfa901c9 39: onsuccess: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref speeds up by -7 [...] new 1f4161a9 40: onsuccess: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 6745d950 41: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 48d7591a 42: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 9de0aa83 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 2791d9f1 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 603 commits new 3180d4ad 45: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new d632cb9c 46: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 6d9c113c 47: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 1e358c0d 48: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 91f000ce 49: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new a632c8ee 50: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 61 commits new f91a86d6 51: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvmorg-17-init- [...] new cef86a81 52: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after llvm: 293 commits new dd0a821b 53: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 1b9c6470 54: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 6819e2a9 55: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new febde160 56: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 8ceae474 57: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 8a7e4023 58: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new f5e21f5b 59: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new 951b2e12 60: onsuccess: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new f2907da6 61: force: #18: [.] strcmp [...] new 742d82bf 62: force: #21: : [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bm [...] new 41315424 63: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new de4a995a 64: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 7e959f1a 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new b6380dd9 66: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new cb0dc528 67: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 3c773a14 68: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new f7d4320c 69: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 39c240db onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new beac5f0f onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new c4fe303f onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 5642ab1c onsuccess: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 80c9344f onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (37f4a380) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/l [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 67 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: