This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO.

discards bc25fd742 onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards d2bae86ae onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 3aa265fe4 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 2d11da9ef onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards ea3ddc0d7 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards fc691396e onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 15c45cda2 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 57f86ade1 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards c680837c2 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 2bc5269d8 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 70e67c150 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 898e4a468 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 0d945bfa1 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 9551a080f 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 3e832ed1c 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards e8cb64926 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 5cb39c25b 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards be54c790e 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards fb89963e2 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards f2f3c0a5f 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards ea485c034 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards f68813db0 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards db0d60699 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 27166d6b7 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 800c7d6a8 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] discards 003375c2b 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] discards 377c87eb0 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 74641fabe 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] discards 568f74816 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards aef2da8e8 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] discards e2bf7db98 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] discards 5611d5295 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards 1c8ab764c 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 5135aa211 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] discards a8fa435e9 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] discards 69b881dc0 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards 81eb2b188 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits discards ee9a3944a 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] discards 7b2395592 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] discards 4a5550847 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits discards 873da37e9 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards aab3f33e3 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards ca6fd9f74 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards aa5924b9d 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 9bb4480e2 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 1edc1acd9 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards df9b8144b 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] discards 38ee0f1f1 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 9c8898dae 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] discards 20e78e36e 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 849e47750 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] discards a48246f27 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 502c7962a 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 9e086b45a 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards f96ad4a6f 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 80f205d7e 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 74d3084fd 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 5ce8250ea 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] discards 7c6e6ec49 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 02c552025 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 03ddc07ff 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] discards 87251e3ff 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards b50b41a20 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 030828730 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] discards 6502f4588 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] discards 528937007 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards 83daacde6 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards e225bb6c2 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] discards 9b440af24 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards 7e2d7abd6 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards ce70a479b 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] discards 86b48db9c 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits discards d802e7238 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards 711e01857 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits discards df4a72557 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] discards 0d07ccb4b 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards 6a25a8049 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 138192a08 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards eff25b498 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 21710cd1e 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 991a890eb 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 512d41507 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 44991b334 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards fec4aaf68 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards d5d87b131 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards f8b5bddeb 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards c197a691a 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] discards 37f746af3 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards a6f4dd439 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits discards 26281793b 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] discards ff802c86e 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards d75be2386 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits discards f64d8632d 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 6fba9d57e 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards f09b05e2e 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] discards 28caae3a0 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits discards abd63be65 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards e5f83a3a9 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards ab28f6fdd 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards c2a4e3de2 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] new c13fc1c2c onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new b60ce2ba2 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new c9e417eb7 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 0ad81d281 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 4f898bbf2 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits new fd1f7f67e 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] new 26f3fcf98 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 97029ba53 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 87070f0fa 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits new 8da6cd5f7 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new ca6751771 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] new e3ce5d5b2 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits new b9074f7aa 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new 4395396b9 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new fa7d018c0 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 909056b05 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 2670267f6 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 27a6126ef 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 2344eece1 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 8da8c0293 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 585c890fd 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 4ab1dbbda 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new c3ff3b161 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new e32e65a24 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new d0d6a9faf 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new da6294822 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] new 875aacc84 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new 20f8a05ad 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 14b0d05eb 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits new 0a50643fc 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new b46f13a37 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 0c35687e8 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new ece57b01e 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new 69a3d10ae 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new fde55f76c 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new d53879538 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] new 2fb901c25 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] new 5dae9d975 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 41f117e81 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new b6d9e2d2b 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new d06faed14 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 8e308e57d 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 02f93aeb3 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] new 9b629cb93 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 7e3ad9ef8 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new c2193050f 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new f15b481af 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 20349f33c 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 3e55364fb 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 675439994 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] new d17d495ac 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new d7f77fc38 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new 563751d61 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new e594bdf17 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] new 9bbffe851 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new f0e2fafbe 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new cbe105489 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new d5f4cc9d9 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new df37f147a 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 5a1c5255c 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new 3b219d9f6 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new e0da085f9 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] new 31a8efa0e 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] new fe7ed319a 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits new 16bd002a4 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 8779d576e 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new 862e6088d 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] new c98185be7 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new fa2230cbb 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new f3d8b6afa 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new decf4cea5 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] new a9e2912b3 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new 4c74178f6 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new 029cf4c91 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 0705d124e 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new 13d1d27e2 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new ec65cb7f0 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new faafdb469 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new a84e06de4 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new d6f9855b8 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 3f2a5813f 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new edab41eda 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 2f2fbf4c2 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new e26b636e0 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new f3bfb5dea 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new cd7debd0f 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 6eb3455bc 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 6b11a4eda 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 4b841906f 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 340978d74 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 855e13054 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 77647f512 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 6f85819d3 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 128c09618 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 11aabcd19 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 343706028 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new b23071c40 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 9331c5db1 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new d09051a91 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new ca766b37e onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (bc25fd742) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 100 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: