This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.

discards 94811c823c 115: onsuccess: #77: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards c952924bc7 114: onsuccess: #75: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 6cf3b35dca 113: onsuccess: #74: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards a647d091c8 112: onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards fce86b4440 111: onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 3cd653d65d 110: onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 5b6f667462 109: force: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 2a8014fa62 108: force: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 3bad115d1b 107: force: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 5c126d6687 106: onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 83ed598f79 105: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 76ae155511 104: force: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards fc05a9dbd8 103: force: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 74862da102 102: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 3112c7194a 101: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards ffb584b131 100: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 873d19723a 99: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards a5f673ac2b 98: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards f9579227e0 97: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 93fc853050 96: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 8c7bdb1e30 95: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards e6c59c8102 94: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 63 commits discards 563bc47f3e 93: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] discards ce182c0701 92: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 0106e8261f 91: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] discards 5e01141b9b 90: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 32d17be759 89: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 39235d356c 88: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 2e781a04c9 87: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 1cc318d410 86: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 106 commits discards c696d0bab6 85: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 16% [...] discards 7fb15fd2c8 84: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -13% [...] discards eaf9768372 83: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards c466c0f8e8 82: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards 06e7b4d1cc 81: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1696 [...] discards 0134d1395c 80: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 2ca6b6059a 79: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 9 [...] discards 0e1d5a226a 78: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 19% [...] discards 17f178e9b2 77: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards d31afa5933 76: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 11% [...] discards bc46fea0c1 75: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards 5d7bac3b8d 74: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] discards 1f5b5041a6 73: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards b1ac9e573d 72: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 commits discards c439eedd54 71: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits discards c2613fa00a 70: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards c1af4f59de 69: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards dd62c59c58 68: force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards ead6858f43 67: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards a212eb6c26 66: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards a62a902ff8 65: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards b1df6f35bd 64: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 7f868e3113 63: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards d4b5302b59 62: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 341 commits discards 6680727b0b 61: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards 539b0f9288 60: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 9 commits discards 1c8f78c0fa 59: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards 3a9f0af43a 58: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 1c613663a8 57: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards b6434c618a 56: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 10323591f9 55: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.9000 [...] discards 453fabf3ce 54: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] discards b4d9dd019b 53: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] discards c7eed59949 52: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 8b45a7ad21 51: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] discards 9d6f4035f4 50: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards 0a3d466ab0 49: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] discards 341b22f4ce 48: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits discards 58635356e9 47: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 54 commits discards 5f5cdeead4 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] discards cfa866349b 45: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 188d958902 44: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] discards 1ac5efe8d9 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -7 [...] discards e90a8697b8 42: onsuccess: #543: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36 [...] discards 4e97aae1ea 41: onsuccess: #541: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK a [...] discards 278aec5170 40: force: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 96b48eef1f 39: onsuccess: #535: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards d2a677d42d 38: force: #524: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards f03d4782d9 37: force: #523: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray:[.] _ZN3pov17Check_ [...] discards 27ed19458c 36: force: #522: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 7fb251c6b4 35: onsuccess: #520: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 690fdf910f 34: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 0fdf6656c8 33: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards f84fc0dd88 32: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards df5cf5d76a 31: onsuccess: #512: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 2af39d9571 30: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 86 commits discards b38329d928 29: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 513e8d4730 28: onsuccess: #507: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards eddbd485fe 27: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 25ce4afc7e 26: onsuccess: #505: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards 392caf9160 25: force: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards bc06bbb67d 24: force: #503: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 71 commits discards 181ae5e21d 23: force: #501: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards cffc77d313 22: force: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref:[.] __memcpy_neon [...] discards ac5983d975 21: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 16894fb14f 20: onsuccess: #496: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 103 commits discards 61b9a0244a 19: force: #495: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 slowed down by 4% [...] discards 5441659e94 18: force: #494: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 96 commits discards 7531919a78 17: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 2dd847b561 16: force: #489: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 3d3c671c25 15: onsuccess: #488: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 122 [...] new e51905a0cb 15: onsuccess: #488: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 122 [...] new a7ae2bff56 16: force: #489: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 5328234c92 17: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 526c3b0948 18: force: #494: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 96 commits new dfb944909e 19: force: #495: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 slowed down by 4% [...] new 249b6370ec 20: onsuccess: #496: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 103 commits new 5100905d08 21: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 817bc15550 22: force: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref:[.] __memcpy_neon [...] new 30858c8138 23: force: #501: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new 20ef0682b0 24: force: #503: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 71 commits new 6124be41e1 25: force: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new 64d65df41b 26: onsuccess: #505: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new 6445c73b21 27: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 5b61b074ce 28: onsuccess: #507: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 64a2a26fb6 29: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 39a99192af 30: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 86 commits new 468bd4f0d3 31: onsuccess: #512: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 0a81a88ad6 32: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 9e1017a01c 33: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 3d3c2975b6 34: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 3e5d30d1f0 35: onsuccess: #520: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new eac690a64d 36: force: #522: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new d6aad7354d 37: force: #523: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray:[.] _ZN3pov17Check_ [...] new 060f306591 38: force: #524: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new d3e6896b8e 39: onsuccess: #535: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 55b93704c5 40: force: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 44b38a6f14 41: onsuccess: #541: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK a [...] new 5e63e62284 42: onsuccess: #543: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36 [...] new c0c85eee11 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -7 [...] new fd20f8f76a 44: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] new 86bf9038aa 45: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new b46ff878a7 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] new cd20221b96 47: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 54 commits new db88c5e601 48: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits new ed99c0c171 49: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] new d1911261c8 50: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new 4e5792959a 51: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] new c86d8f927e 52: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 19f6fa9893 53: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] new 826ba0f899 54: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] new 69bbf73663 55: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.9000 [...] new 375190a3b7 56: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 5966e7fd81 57: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new e985f68083 58: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new fc9796c7ea 59: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 41f9927451 60: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 9 commits new a01d63454f 61: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new 93cfbe2925 62: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 341 commits new 6b6efef69c 63: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 7e8db775a9 64: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new bc3b8691e5 65: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 2dbc6f58cd 66: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new f770f1f9fd 67: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new d0a6fda19b 68: force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new cb0024369b 69: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 4dadb99438 70: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new 8e6823cda8 71: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits new cb0e92c42c 72: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 commits new 7d39ce0b59 73: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 9e41e5f93e 74: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] new 2597110ec6 75: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new f46460031f 76: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 11% [...] new 1cea5b9e7a 77: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 9075332cac 78: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 19% [...] new 1e61b9445f 79: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 9 [...] new 4a4e4c745b 80: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new da17615161 81: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1696 [...] new 5726353d7a 82: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new bf0682b0b4 83: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 6d6dcfae36 84: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -13% [...] new 456b7ca18b 85: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 16% [...] new aa43b4b69f 86: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 106 commits new cb362215b1 87: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 0f85887ebf 88: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 9d74bd8bd9 89: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e38fac9939 90: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 29514cd699 91: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] new 6a8ac09790 92: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new a2a1bbb7ad 93: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] new d48a31c442 94: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 63 commits new 266c8832ef 95: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 75654f8f9f 96: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 1a13b4e547 97: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new cbd71ef61c 98: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new c505d1d08c 99: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new b68804ab13 100: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 68850630c2 101: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 2b38e7718e 102: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 8b57e9aab4 103: force: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 66cebf4258 104: force: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 42c5ffafbb 105: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new e5a38136fe 106: onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 5cad5cc9f6 107: force: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 5cd6084f42 108: force: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new da51e4f69c 109: force: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 5e640d5652 110: onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 016d39804a 111: onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 0df57a0fbc 112: onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 4568ec2b68 113: onsuccess: #74: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 5cbdb160a4 114: onsuccess: #75: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new b09be2baa2 115: onsuccess: #77: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new c35b20cd5f 116: force: #79: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (94811c823c) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2172 -> 2192 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2496 -> 2436 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 28228 -> 27468 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz | Bin 18192 -> 17688 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 90800 -> 90476 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz | Bin 70100 -> 69964 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 368 -> 368 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 7716 -> 8544 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 235664 -> 233676 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/make-glibc.log.xz | Bin 185928 -> 185576 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 213768 -> 212008 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz | Bin 178592 -> 179704 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 187 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 185 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4180 -> 4180 bytes 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 198 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 17404 -> 18548 bytes 10-check_regression/exe.improvement | 1 - 10-check_regression/exe.regression | 1 + .../output-bmk-results/exe.improvement | 1 - .../output-bmk-results/exe.improvement.diff | 4 - .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression.diff | 1 + .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement | 7 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement.diff | 2 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression | 11 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression.diff | 2 +- 10-check_regression/results.regressions | 1 + 11-update_baseline/console.log | 74 +- manifest.sh | 21 +- notify/check-regression-status.txt | 2 +- notify/exe.improvement | 1 - notify/exe.regression | 1 + results | 1 + results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 240 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 2808 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/results.csv | 760016 ++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/size.csv | 762516 ++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 30624 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 908 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2711 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3395 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 757184 ++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 771225 +++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 30110 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 1126 +- results-vs-first/interesting-symbols.csv | 161 +- results-vs-first/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-first/results-full.csv | 3212 +- results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 249 +- results-vs-first/results.csv | 249 +- results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3808 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 248 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 7 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 3020 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 3354 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 747378 +++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 750476 +++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 30676 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 1156 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2711 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3395 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 757184 ++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 771225 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 30110 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 1126 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 161 +- results-vs-prev/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/results-full.csv | 3420 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 253 +- results-vs-prev/results.csv | 253 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 4412 +- results_id | 2 +- 72 files changed, 3145805 insertions(+), 3096141 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/exe.improvement create mode 100644 10-check_regression/exe.regression delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.improvement delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.improvement.diff create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.regression.diff create mode 100644 10-check_regression/results.regressions delete mode 100644 notify/exe.improvement create mode 100644 notify/exe.regression