This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O2 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.

discards 978e9cba88 111: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 91718d71e6 110: force: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 9e8220699a 109: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 61eb0f96f5 108: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 5445ad5ccb 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 776cd05ea9 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 10bec3e401 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 06c3ad90b2 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 77cca9a68f 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards d0ea10c231 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 9789b4e9f1 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] discards b470c74887 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-48462 [...] discards ba8630190d 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits discards 7c78e0ef54 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 231 [...] discards 3af8a2de07 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits discards 02ae40f8f0 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards fbf494cf8c 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits discards 1e44e4a76d 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards ed2110c68e 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits discards 9d1f30cdf3 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] discards 159d94a63a 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 17f656adc9 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 1c88dffadd 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] discards b5dd2765e6 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards c04d784acc 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards b2c139be60 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] discards f8f04bcbe3 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards ef211583f6 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 73917f33c1 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards c3d1e99b1f 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% a [...] discards 3759fee7c4 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] discards a3d4e602b5 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-4559 [...] discards b3821a116a 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] discards ab00ce6648 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards d51e7aa312 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 0728364615 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 08da363a79 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 commits discards 03cb63c62d 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards d6a95aaadb 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits discards e8710b259c 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_step [...] discards 4f8e2bcabe 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] discards 77ec6ed914 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 370b7176a2 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 5a5d3305d0 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 7e15cfb399 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards 2f3add166e 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards 54e373e5e5 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 [...] discards 0fd8270847 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slow [...] discards d17e0a0ae2 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] discards dd95e314b4 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards 266b25150d 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchpo [...] discards 2528376c7f 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards eef87c8af6 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards fa3501514c 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards 5e694ad892 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 6450 [...] discards c4c2215ced 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK a [...] discards 92586e476a 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] discards 7f328734c1 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 07ddc7369d 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards 92ad415e7e 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bi [...] discards a846920578 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards e2af064e4a 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards f229d28a3e 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 708208e665 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards 0458868bd2 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 73c2da328c 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards f9a58067eb 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards b1ee2d7e89 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] discards 5a6306a69d 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 43a8b83c5f 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 58a5812f60 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] discards 6cbaa7b496 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 1249445aad 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] discards fc1e4aa227 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits discards 6b623db8dd 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards b5b1793520 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 1e32662a21 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run [...] discards e03fa4c262 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] discards 48f4bb5820 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 8719ebd4d9 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] discards 8eefd2b9b3 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 21 [...] discards 60cb232f9b 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 9fbb960214 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] discards ae1c7f70a3 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 81287a66e5 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 3f24d16da9 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 19f9a758e2 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits discards 44dd67d41e 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 767eb4cfa5 23: onsuccess: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 9f35c369f4 22: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 936af65368 21: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 12 commits discards 6a400b4f95 20: force: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards 1e459ef024 19: force: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 18 [...] discards bf8f6a7401 18: onsuccess: #413: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 4f99d6ec56 17: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits discards 93cb26c7f2 16: onsuccess: #410: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 35ff626c6f 15: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 35 commits discards 0e558a9192 14: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 208 commits discards 6a1297be03 13: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards e3b8df0df9 12: force: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 1887fb908b 11: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline b [...] new 574a36c88c 11: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline b [...] new b4715fd5fd 12: force: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new a8a75f8c90 13: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new faa52b3387 14: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 208 commits new e1e7255043 15: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 35 commits new 45cd841d47 16: onsuccess: #410: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 07e4f24512 17: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits new 4ae67a0f99 18: onsuccess: #413: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 0b6aef3a41 19: force: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 18 [...] new 30cc92fa81 20: force: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new 9bb097878c 21: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 12 commits new 9679c8304a 22: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 35c659b8fc 23: onsuccess: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new bfc0354fed 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new ea52fae98a 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits new 2e4533d2d5 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 9a2f1c9a21 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new b32da126fc 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new dd043a04a6 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] new bd65331f2d 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 73d88c80de 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 21 [...] new a656b624c0 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] new 31c0e03ed4 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 8d277de069 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] new bef4cd2802 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run [...] new c437021448 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new afb8bcb3b6 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new 93448a84ed 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits new 1d5bc6dd16 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] new 656e6850bb 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 52aed052de 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] new 46c163fa02 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 2e13f6d61f 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new b97a88f489 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] new 718ac17601 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 5684c8f2d4 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new c99ba79b01 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 799f7265ca 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new a6443881e6 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 5406281182 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 7d023e85d5 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 397d5ff911 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bi [...] new b544bb5a7c 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 5f897d4da7 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 3f97f81549 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] new a70ee7dcce 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK a [...] new fa8badb239 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 6450 [...] new 7e22adfe7b 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new c032120d9a 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new ee5bd76ad4 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new d0c4848e62 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchpo [...] new dec69197f4 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new 5e42c1b928 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] new 3d23ec5b5b 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slow [...] new 82b281b681 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 [...] new 7dc5e42439 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new 3ccf716dcd 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new 6bcc932703 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 8b4fb338ff 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 6d073e2ee2 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 0bb2fb7bcd 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] new 9010456836 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_step [...] new 5bb9788691 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits new eb0f0aaf59 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new 54555013ff 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 commits new bd818dd8fc 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new b6e7042303 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e251b5ceab 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 27ced8eb70 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] new 88177304f5 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-4559 [...] new a686f71ccc 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] new 8d45f45d53 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% a [...] new d114c91c6a 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 571c0b5101 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 0edf9e47b2 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 10560bd178 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] new 418438bfab 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 7094e8f1d1 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new c06b1e4d43 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] new 5bd957c580 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 76543b637c 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b9124dc63e 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] new 428313f7c3 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits new c0d8d3b1a8 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new db7c7551fc 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits new e59e7f14b4 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ac0b14c252 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits new 9b79910f8e 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 231 [...] new 393d834f0e 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits new ce9bcd5ff4 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-48462 [...] new 015e1e44a9 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] new 781f471db8 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 3930612ae9 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 531692c7fe 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new af73471a9f 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new b93e2ea665 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 994fe3ae35 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 1ce8253d14 108: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new f865d8bc9d 109: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 1f0e03031a 110: force: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 6038befad4 111: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new f3ca4e6e96 112: force: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (978e9cba88) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2216 -> 2212 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2472 -> 2488 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27892 -> 27912 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 92004 -> 91932 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 7772 -> 7728 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 234344 -> 234236 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 215064 -> 213288 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 176 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 174 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4144 -> 4196 bytes .../437.leslie3d.symbols-improvement | 6 - .../437.leslie3d.symbols-regression | 6 + 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 148 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 20052 -> 19184 bytes 10-check_regression/exe.improvement | 2 - 10-check_regression/exe.regression | 2 +- 10-check_regression/extra-bisect-params | 2 +- .../output-bmk-results/exe.improvement | 2 - .../output-bmk-results/exe.improvement.diff | 6 - .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression | 2 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement | 10 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression | 7 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression.diff | 9 +- 10-check_regression/results.regressions | 8 +- 10-check_regression/symbol.regression | 6 + 10-check_regression/trigger-bisect | 3 - 11-update_baseline/console.log | 70 +- mail/exe.improvement | 2 - mail/exe.regression | 2 +- mail/symbol.regression | 6 + manifest.sh | 15 +- results | 8 +- results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 239 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 1668 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/results.csv | 489800 ++++++------ results-vs-first/csv-results-0/size.csv | 633188 +++++++-------- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 20568 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 32 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2751 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3406 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 469191 ++++++------ results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 644078 ++++++++-------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 24750 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 48 +- results-vs-first/interesting-symbols.csv | 121 +- results-vs-first/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-first/results-full.csv | 3226 +- results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 253 +- results-vs-first/results.csv | 253 +- results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3350 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 243 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 15 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 2882 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 3378 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 632859 +++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 720450 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 24432 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 54 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2749 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3406 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 469191 ++++++------ results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 644078 ++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 24750 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 48 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 121 +- results-vs-prev/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/results-full.csv | 3496 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 253 +- results-vs-prev/results.csv | 253 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3836 +- results_id | 2 +- 71 files changed, 2422295 insertions(+), 2411931 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/437.leslie3d.symbols-improvement create mode 100644 10-check_regression/437.leslie3d.symbols-regression delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/exe.improvement delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.improvement delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.improvement.diff create mode 100644 10-check_regression/symbol.regression delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/trigger-bisect delete mode 100644 mail/exe.improvement create mode 100644 mail/symbol.regression