This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.

discards ab7337d1b9 104: force: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards e18914a184 103: force: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 4de980b125 102: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 6a00645014 101: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 7a029b1da9 100: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards fe96cc822a 99: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards cec8db47ad 98: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 5f6ab9de01 97: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 2ab3289d46 96: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards cb84c40b97 95: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards efe5e0c632 94: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 63 commits discards 06f461ff7f 93: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] discards e1b3d5b56f 92: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 429db9051c 91: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] discards 5ee72e6078 90: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 981736dbd0 89: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards a7a45ef41a 88: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 5ac815ecd2 87: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 7206e05b87 86: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 106 commits discards 5a6807f933 85: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 16% [...] discards 2dc041774a 84: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -13% [...] discards 70f82512e3 83: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 75e79069ab 82: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards 1b340b183d 81: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1696 [...] discards dbb4e4a762 80: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards e92e1706ed 79: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 9 [...] discards 52d6dfe1ed 78: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 19% [...] discards 9f382f9950 77: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards af3a11061d 76: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 11% [...] discards 03345f8a99 75: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards dbee639a0d 74: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] discards 97f32a4339 73: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 9e3398cb06 72: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 commits discards ea33c37428 71: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits discards 733306741e 70: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards 2c0640d1a4 69: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards f51d11a96d 68: force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards d6ff8f500f 67: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 5de3136eea 66: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards d7ad022c48 65: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 4c61093f48 64: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards b72e902936 63: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 4730974bf9 62: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 341 commits discards e716cf9c2d 61: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards e192a0b2ff 60: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 9 commits discards 5269d87db2 59: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards ce3a816f16 58: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 147614a801 57: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 5caf6b9d3f 56: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards e45195c994 55: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.9000 [...] discards 9d7c83efe5 54: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] discards 7d5f6db6fe 53: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] discards de2f7414e6 52: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards ec18f31fc8 51: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] discards e958fea0a4 50: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards da49f621fa 49: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] discards 1cf980ff68 48: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits discards ec557f42f0 47: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 54 commits discards b209430557 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] discards a96923bc7e 45: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 546904baef 44: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] discards 425c84e2de 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -7 [...] discards e7eb6e9015 42: onsuccess: #543: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36 [...] discards 643afeb08f 41: onsuccess: #541: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK a [...] discards 0820baae59 40: force: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 44f9bb6bf3 39: onsuccess: #535: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards ab93c8c21f 38: force: #524: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 79d77d0eb7 37: force: #523: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray:[.] _ZN3pov17Check_ [...] discards 6a660f1c8b 36: force: #522: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 0434040ab4 35: onsuccess: #520: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 11dd97e328 34: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards b7b38e718c 33: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 4d12385964 32: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 7da44a927b 31: onsuccess: #512: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards bf0a4e153b 30: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 86 commits discards d2203e6e04 29: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 454bb29844 28: onsuccess: #507: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 7e8b892d4d 27: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards e1f5911be2 26: onsuccess: #505: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards d1eaf6c27e 25: force: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards b5fffb32c3 24: force: #503: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 71 commits discards c2397bdc68 23: force: #501: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards a664b19ec8 22: force: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref:[.] __memcpy_neon [...] discards 7972b43812 21: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 3ae7e1f70d 20: onsuccess: #496: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 103 commits discards 44f299d1e7 19: force: #495: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 slowed down by 4% [...] discards 7ab2c96022 18: force: #494: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 96 commits discards 43a40451bc 17: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 8bb5a629fa 16: force: #489: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 79202213e0 15: onsuccess: #488: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 122 [...] discards 01c5028468 14: onsuccess: #487: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits discards 64bf6c82da 13: onsuccess: #483: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 speeds up by - [...] discards 73ead9ddbc 12: onsuccess: #482: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 8b464338ad 11: onsuccess: #479: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards de93d61751 10: onsuccess: #478: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards da37af6d4d 9: force: #472: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 14% [...] discards 1ee2013d36 8: force: #463: 1: [TCWG CI] 445.gobmk:[.] fastlib slowed do [...] discards c642a44f75 7: force: #461: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% afte [...] discards 771306dcb9 6: force: #460: 1: [TCWG CI] 447.dealII built and run OK aft [...] discards 3ef8e95ed0 5: force: #458: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp slowed down by 7% a [...] discards 49d4463d0f 4: force: #457: 1: [TCWG CI] 447.dealII failed to build afte [...] new 51f0e551ce 4: force: #457: 1: [TCWG CI] 447.dealII failed to build afte [...] new 9ac49ef1bf 5: force: #458: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp slowed down by 7% a [...] new 3e41adf872 6: force: #460: 1: [TCWG CI] 447.dealII built and run OK aft [...] new f833d1091b 7: force: #461: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% afte [...] new ebec506c59 8: force: #463: 1: [TCWG CI] 445.gobmk:[.] fastlib slowed do [...] new 6cfc76bac6 9: force: #472: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 14% [...] new 80d1dc1cc3 10: onsuccess: #478: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 3750db4664 11: onsuccess: #479: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 079ac02814 12: onsuccess: #482: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new d344389881 13: onsuccess: #483: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 speeds up by - [...] new 83316bf217 14: onsuccess: #487: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits new 6c301413ea 15: onsuccess: #488: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 122 [...] new 7712f041bf 16: force: #489: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new d007c1596f 17: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new f5ca7fe4fe 18: force: #494: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 96 commits new 482fff3c82 19: force: #495: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 slowed down by 4% [...] new 83f2f1ac5b 20: onsuccess: #496: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 103 commits new 79f65e43a7 21: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 6f0faadd4f 22: force: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref:[.] __memcpy_neon [...] new 25cb0e9a0e 23: force: #501: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new 2373c63517 24: force: #503: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 71 commits new 6d03fe78ca 25: force: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new c3803a9855 26: onsuccess: #505: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new db732e0587 27: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 7a06ce9558 28: onsuccess: #507: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 026b6f1c52 29: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new b4fa2cfd4e 30: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 86 commits new 46265d60c1 31: onsuccess: #512: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 3d3ba2515c 32: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 5cdaed0a65 33: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new ddfc3bed5a 34: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new bbd23597b2 35: onsuccess: #520: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new ab4c35efdb 36: force: #522: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new ae50c7959e 37: force: #523: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray:[.] _ZN3pov17Check_ [...] new bc73d19f84 38: force: #524: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 39d2baf375 39: onsuccess: #535: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 4b1b4d33c1 40: force: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 8075d8f156 41: onsuccess: #541: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK a [...] new 9fc16b71c1 42: onsuccess: #543: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36 [...] new d29ba84678 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -7 [...] new 7729ff2e3e 44: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] new 388d63e1a1 45: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new a270d5eee6 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] new 83f027e2af 47: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 54 commits new 7ae2650f52 48: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits new 3b9b4f1cdf 49: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] new 859192ace2 50: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new d99fc943fd 51: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] new 2e797ec17d 52: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new bac81b78bf 53: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] new d9cc84e0f0 54: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] new 705e36c16d 55: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.9000 [...] new 164d014441 56: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 8dd421cb9d 57: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 82fa2f1e41 58: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 8ce3bc8355 59: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new cafefb92d2 60: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 9 commits new e5024e9934 61: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new 2c166d170b 62: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 341 commits new 359ee1ba4c 63: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 8541ec272b 64: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 560ace3779 65: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 523f44c509 66: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 6bb862f1c2 67: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new fd1df470ee 68: force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 2194b92ff9 69: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 7fc595aee7 70: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new 0a28001774 71: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits new 0cc798ea35 72: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 commits new 3d203c18de 73: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new fd80960f81 74: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] new 431f76f4dc 75: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new 099d4c0dae 76: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 11% [...] new b94631a0d8 77: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new cdddc9a3b0 78: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 19% [...] new 7eb3f8a27d 79: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 9 [...] new f04b0fa76a 80: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 85d052f640 81: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1696 [...] new 2ebf61fe14 82: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new b55e671ab1 83: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new ef40a7cb8a 84: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -13% [...] new 8134274c18 85: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 16% [...] new 7aa7b585f7 86: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 106 commits new 4d9cdf8616 87: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ae664ed329 88: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 4b7476dfc6 89: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 545f999c4a 90: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 7c209714ea 91: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] new 896cadb81b 92: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b7345ebb18 93: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] new 876b8198e8 94: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 63 commits new 2a5211083c 95: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 03374f93e1 96: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 83d8dd7cc7 97: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 7bb9f8ee2e 98: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 323accf5ae 99: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new a0f113167d 100: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 17ba39261c 101: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 789a3c2fa0 102: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 8976ffcb40 103: force: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new d3bb62ba9d 104: force: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new a875e50a00 105: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (ab7337d1b9) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2176 -> 2192 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2488 -> 2468 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27376 -> 27652 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 90180 -> 89808 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 7672 -> 7648 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 234796 -> 234436 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 218196 -> 214040 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 177 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 175 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4200 -> 4116 bytes 10-check_regression/437.leslie3d.symbols-skipped | 3 + 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 174 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 14900 -> 14064 bytes 10-check_regression/exe.improvement | 1 + 10-check_regression/exe.regression | 2 - 10-check_regression/extra-bisect-params | 2 +- .../{exe.regression.diff => exe.improvement.diff} | 2 +- .../output-bmk-results/extra-bisect-params | 1 - 10-check_regression/results.regressions | 2 - 10-check_regression/trigger-bisect | 3 - 10-check_regression/trigger-notify | 0 11-update_baseline/console.log | 74 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- jenkins/notify.sh | 2 +- mail/check-regression-status.txt | 2 +- mail/exe.improvement | 1 + mail/exe.regression | 2 - manifest.sh | 16 +- results | 2 - results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 220 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 1050 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/results.csv | 414722 +++++----- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/size.csv | 563576 ++++++------- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 10928 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 196 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2536 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3129 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 715848 +++++++++-------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 744876 +++++++++-------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 28710 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 782 +- results-vs-first/interesting-symbols.csv | 110 +- results-vs-first/results-brief.csv | 58 +- results-vs-first/results-full.csv | 3061 +- results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 228 +- results-vs-first/results.csv | 228 +- results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3652 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 235 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 22 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 2986 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 3248 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 753596 ++++++++---------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 685730 ++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 29751 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 965 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2532 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3129 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 715848 +++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 744876 +++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 28710 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 782 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 110 +- results-vs-prev/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/results-full.csv | 3245 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 244 +- results-vs-prev/results.csv | 244 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 4212 +- results_id | 2 +- 68 files changed, 2772802 insertions(+), 2702286 deletions(-) create mode 100644 10-check_regression/437.leslie3d.symbols-skipped create mode 100644 10-check_regression/exe.improvement delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/exe.regression rename 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/{exe.regression.diff => exe.improvem [...] delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/extra-bisect-params delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/results.regressions delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/trigger-bisect delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/trigger-notify create mode 100644 mail/exe.improvement delete mode 100644 mail/exe.regression