[toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO] branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO updated (1a3a6d2c -> 4642c65e)
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO.
discards 1a3a6d2c onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 1fcda641 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 442c5e9a onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards ce0e5294 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 883223d8 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards e93e4626 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards fdd84c25 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 0a83556b onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 84b3f9b1 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 680a6c83 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 9dcdc5fc 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards e267bbf5 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 75422a71 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 794c31ca 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards c62369e5 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards c49e0ebd 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards c5e30481 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards a2224a9f 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 93a586da 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 5af8d589 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 7355ceee 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards cce02ab0 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 5dc9a894 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 2c399b04 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 29072d93 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] discards 41225833 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] discards 54567bc2 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 2b0b8241 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] discards 4f7149b4 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards acfca0d8 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] discards c2e4e97d 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] discards db7d3358 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards eb2a1fae 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 2122457c 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] discards 48ecb088 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] discards ce6b7075 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards 572e78d2 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits discards 327a5e14 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] discards d58e1d5d 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] discards 24239759 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits discards 1bba0252 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards 439f4ec3 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards 99ffbb16 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards f67894b5 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 2d2d3a68 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 991a75e7 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards cc214392 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] discards 4944a2f8 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards c2e9957b 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] discards 31bae798 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 6723d4a7 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] discards a5143175 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 167457b6 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 9a102d42 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 321b5501 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 8c07b141 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards b79cc04c 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards c2b770e0 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] discards 86d019bc 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 2edf8fa9 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards c6452806 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] discards 82cb31fc 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards f5d1f8d2 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 66753469 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] discards 63833fd9 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] discards ba2ba44d 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards c4260c74 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards f2e4a3d4 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] discards 6336ed50 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards b11d31cb 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 53aaadff 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] discards 42454134 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits discards f1679295 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards a371dcdb 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits discards f1924986 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] discards 0edd90ff 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards c0f6f8fa 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards dfbe04dc 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards 24840ae7 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 0bfbf1e7 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 7b29a4ab 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 8e460330 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 488cfca1 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 8cca374f 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards b1537622 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 28502cb9 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards a2537368 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] discards 5470421e 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards 756bc915 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits discards 94d4eafc 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] discards 94dac05f 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards 90d7cdbf 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits discards 710d190c 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards c2cb69be 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 893d45c5 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] discards 207a8f37 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits discards 18ffd2af 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 733c3513 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 7b7bdc00 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards a2be1b6a 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] discards 6e721370 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 73e70384 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 9c45cb7c 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards ce1c465a 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 4ed6f6ec 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] discards 499687c1 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards e0e906bf 9: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 99ee9ba4 onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new c0198729 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 4684bc93 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] new db993a58 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b4ccdad0 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new f6b7b664 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 5fc73dcf 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new d16a0ca3 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] new e370ce20 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 46968975 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new f1d72aab 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new d6d8ae81 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits new b919f349 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] new b7adf45f 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 2107b879 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new fc7eb358 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits new c1e3d6a6 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new 3f09a86d 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] new c42546e2 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits new b509e106 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new eb315c24 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new 1a1c4fd8 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 5ed7a9ce 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ca74df45 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e1d47919 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 79004eb9 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 5713c098 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 6185a5f3 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new bff0be32 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new fbfb80c3 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new db67b9de 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 9d4dabee 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 2c640dad 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] new d60a0dd9 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new 647007ce 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new b76a15e6 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits new 57dc4713 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new d9824e8d 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new db419ba2 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 072d6e8e 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new 0ac51c95 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new d790f6cc 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new 28307d8e 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] new 99823716 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] new 585a5cf4 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new ebc2e65d 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new dea40d02 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new 27692e14 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new e8d50b0f 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new d20e2632 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] new 0ced7b7b 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new bf51772f 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 8eedd8aa 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new e1a3c9f6 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 702c8a9c 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new aee53617 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 9c012035 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] new dae141df 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 252dbf42 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new 05a4c12b 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new a08b15c6 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] new 95b14cc0 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new c1de9ba4 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new e355489c 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 3b95fc7f 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 337589fe 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 0f2c0408 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new 509dd8ff 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new da370ad0 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] new 55fd8215 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] new d4205582 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits new 6f2ef94b 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new be661392 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new 5f10c7ab 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] new 13c066a1 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 025c47b9 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 2f5e34f8 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new da50e948 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] new 473aaf3d 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new 496e7311 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new 25b3b3b4 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 5cb6f4f9 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new a919100e 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new 3b7bcc92 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 495e7021 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 0dc9baad 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new e23b816f 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 56d3f2f6 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new ee9f72be 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new dee1a2dd 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new d2ff5abf 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 4ec6035d 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 6da86229 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new a9c3c1fb 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new c58fb487 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new ac421d7a 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new baa4cb09 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new cadd96fc onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 894704d3 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 65ed8a3e onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 7b53ac69 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 9bd41d95 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new d82a12d1 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 074efe4a onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new e667e3d8 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 99fc9570 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 4642c65e onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (1a3a6d2c) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 107 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes:
-
git＠git.linaro.org