This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO.

discards c10234057 onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards c783d256a onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 9cd6a2a9c onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 377817b88 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 28794dc14 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 01229a5ca onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 03e563806 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards ec045f071 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 6de40f83e onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 93dedcc17 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 52a9f96a6 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 2ae8a40ac 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 45c8d9ff5 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards c64c0f09f 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 0c7d956de 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 94f652e88 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards d5dc25120 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards e7fa9f9bb 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards cce009919 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 69c2ece63 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 3a9f6b22a 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards f7cabdd11 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards d3b91b5db 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards f12e00a32 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards ca29cf60e 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] discards 795b12f56 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] discards 39ee71c2f 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 737f37d00 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] discards c79cf2a41 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 124241425 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 1827098c8 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] discards 70063973f 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards 76637fbe4 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards a7608fc02 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] discards ce22a7411 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] discards dadb9c07f 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards 0d1263778 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits discards 79df5845a 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] discards 15315e5c6 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] discards dd54d711e 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits discards 2e6f6cf47 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards 6a4cce895 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards bc72de002 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 3e28cf955 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 2f2d09552 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 1b89de4e7 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards 25f0afc59 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] discards 26e4115ee 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 18512893b 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] discards 9e8170034 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 9f9c58959 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] discards 14f4194e3 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 4f04a638e 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards fc69bd57b 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 896028c7a 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards dad768a3b 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 0658e07f1 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 47b95c8cd 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] discards 5485237d2 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 3849c8fa8 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 0e22ae485 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] discards b51d5bb6b 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 84fe55040 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 86838bdf1 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] discards a6d3b50a4 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] discards 6b4f7162e 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards 8d5e4eab5 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 7affad497 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] discards 28f2297df 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards 90fbd9e06 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards cc5f90994 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] discards 6d8bb09e9 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits discards 39d770c58 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards 277e84106 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits discards e904209be 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] discards 964327572 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards 8240d45f8 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards bc7a7d4bc 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards c37b24fb6 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 0b381edf7 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 82d792137 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 2cd5fd34c 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards c760a7546 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 7b2d11565 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards e857ce6d3 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 5cf2f4667 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards 1eb0164c9 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] discards 028ec26a2 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards 9e1191451 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits discards 76672ef24 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] discards ea55e4faa 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards aa037c21d 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits discards 61ca38b8b 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 2d903e1c0 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards a939797d0 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] discards 0596f1934 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits discards d738a0528 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards dad4b817b 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards af1584a02 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 1331b6dc8 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] discards 3082a61a8 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 775a8498a onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new c2a4e3de2 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] new ab28f6fdd 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e5f83a3a9 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new abd63be65 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 28caae3a0 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits new f09b05e2e 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] new 6fba9d57e 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new f64d8632d 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new d75be2386 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits new ff802c86e 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new 26281793b 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] new a6f4dd439 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits new 37f746af3 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new c197a691a 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new f8b5bddeb 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new d5d87b131 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new fec4aaf68 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 44991b334 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 512d41507 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 991a890eb 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 21710cd1e 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new eff25b498 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 138192a08 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new 6a25a8049 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 0d07ccb4b 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new df4a72557 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] new 711e01857 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new d802e7238 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 86b48db9c 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits new ce70a479b 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new 7e2d7abd6 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 9b440af24 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new e225bb6c2 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new 83daacde6 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 528937007 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new 6502f4588 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] new 030828730 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] new b50b41a20 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 87251e3ff 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 03ddc07ff 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new 02c552025 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 7c6e6ec49 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 5ce8250ea 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] new 74d3084fd 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 80f205d7e 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new f96ad4a6f 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 9e086b45a 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 502c7962a 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new a48246f27 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 849e47750 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] new 20e78e36e 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 9c8898dae 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new 38ee0f1f1 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new df9b8144b 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] new 1edc1acd9 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 9bb4480e2 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new aa5924b9d 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new ca6fd9f74 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new aab3f33e3 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 873da37e9 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new 4a5550847 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new 7b2395592 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] new ee9a3944a 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] new 81eb2b188 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits new 69b881dc0 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new a8fa435e9 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new 5135aa211 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] new 1c8ab764c 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 5611d5295 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new e2bf7db98 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new aef2da8e8 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] new 568f74816 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new 74641fabe 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new 377c87eb0 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 003375c2b 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new 800c7d6a8 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new 27166d6b7 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new db0d60699 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new f68813db0 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new ea485c034 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new f2f3c0a5f 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new fb89963e2 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new be54c790e 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 5cb39c25b 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new e8cb64926 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 3e832ed1c 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 9551a080f 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 0d945bfa1 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 898e4a468 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 70e67c150 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 2bc5269d8 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new c680837c2 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 57f86ade1 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 15c45cda2 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new fc691396e onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new ea3ddc0d7 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 2d11da9ef onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 3aa265fe4 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new d2bae86ae onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new bc25fd742 onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (c10234057) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 101 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: