This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.

discards 9608a5ed30 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 2348e70c12 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards ea11720fe3 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 8a4c4ece56 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards d678167407 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 83a19a1d4b 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards e60d546ecd 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 7ecb4683d7 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards fc87b079cf 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards fb2a633cd5 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 3cd8360fe7 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 3e7e177675 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards c2d020168f 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 083af52fa2 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 7a01d451c7 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 6619d6a563 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards b61314499d 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: n [...] discards 304ce3163c 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 4d253c0095 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 908a7f8d30 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 5f713eeffa 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% [...] discards dc80b516c6 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% [...] discards 186f0a9f84 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards ce83352523 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards a29a27a9d9 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 6e494cb531 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] discards 693dd86edb 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards aff8003c30 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 [...] discards 45d3240fae 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] discards ea41a526b1 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% af [...] discards cf260d1483 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits discards 5a7584c31f 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards 2b31f74cc1 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards a599adc5f1 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 8c9c9c4c41 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 74a3a1ff90 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 1b6db304a4 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards b98204597a 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 095d10b3d3 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards cded318b83 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] discards a8e76fdf3e 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 2ec777eaa4 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK afte [...] discards 7d2f21bd90 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards abd6fcd3dd 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] discards e5fc3c8ffb 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 9462dfd175 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards b771656c41 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards e4d3e3e111 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] discards 98106f85ce 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards 820d35170f 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build afte [...] discards 2d8566c0ba 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards 9e024745af 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] discards bc7ba166e9 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards c64d706b25 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards 8c83450d29 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gd [...] discards eebd061ad0 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards d004f33f62 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards 70a761860e 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build afte [...] discards 0841dbbb02 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bu [...] discards 4454ddc69c 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after [...] discards 10fbf24a9f 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] discards 5a05deefdf 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] discards 8b346ceb53 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 [...] discards a25ad64bc1 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] discards 2c0dd23ebe 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits discards 8b2c9a6d33 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-41 [...] discards bd85b00ca7 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] discards c64796607b 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards dea6ba49d4 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] discards bf092ca8e3 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 64ec60be4a 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards dd38e6c4b8 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 913ea89c24 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 771a97300a 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards f4d64b2050 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 0cf834b1cf 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards acfa977bc1 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards ac756f0642 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-416 [...] discards 4ad4ce43be 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards 3bc95a9d55 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits discards 2cc843aa55 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards abb23d831b 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards 2e80b98d81 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits discards 46082f6b79 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 89e13ed7da 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 40623bf9f5 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-416 [...] discards 8dfca11c51 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits discards 8cd732a4b8 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 64073e593a 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards e898fc5cb2 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 28c0aab77e 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6 [...] discards 5378c0e27c 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards ee5e8e9ccc 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards e3328a8f75 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards cc63f669cc 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 7f44b11574 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] discards 79603cc5b5 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards ecf17f981f 9: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 0d44b2c028 8: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by [...] discards 51ab9a759e 7: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] new 90b6002e95 7: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/linu [...] new 6c25703cf7 8: onsuccess: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 483.xalancbmk speeds up by [...] new ce0dc93a2d 9: onsuccess: #388: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 314734489e 10: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 2f3ce791eb 11: force: #395: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 8% [...] new a9e4f8f9e6 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 250a1cc882 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 63ee9c5382 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 2ab70cff24 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 2835b4a5c9 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6 [...] new d8aa3e3aa6 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 9a2ebefd6d 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new bbdd319fc7 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 81fe633047 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits new 054150a6ea 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-416 [...] new 2edb4c6559 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new a3038144d3 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 132ce4588d 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits new f3dfd4ade6 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new 428020fe6f 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new a0e6b5a30e 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits new e10793bcbf 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new bb7faf89f5 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-416 [...] new 1454e3be2d 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new cb754bef8b 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 1f0a1ad18b 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 2a0e3e4489 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new feca64fb9e 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new f5015c2886 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 0869ae5dd3 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 1eed2bc2c8 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new a07beebc63 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] new efd37a377e 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 620f73f93b 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] new 17bb9fe92f 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-41 [...] new d3959855b7 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new d5e8329242 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new 8c8bcdc72f 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 [...] new b7b1a7e4ea 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] new 116bbe1a64 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] new cd92e06f7e 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after [...] new 1358f2cf90 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bu [...] new 3187049eda 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build afte [...] new c8ecdba246 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new 972cc30652 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 1f10d10a96 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gd [...] new 2a98fe26dd 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new 86ee58b138 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 24e2e49496 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] new 9d3fdbfba2 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new a654e67065 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build afte [...] new 35a9c513b5 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 543d0fc826 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] new 6027af53ce 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 062e3ea800 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new 4f22a24d92 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new c296b5dc23 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] new 1c0eb7b3e2 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new e8261fad4d 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK afte [...] new 066daedce2 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new ffbae091d9 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] new 6aee404f9b 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 40a26ed2ce 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new ca8e34411d 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 2c38fedfca 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new f6b5a28145 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 388f876d14 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 82cca3b833 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 52a8d8d8e6 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new 6bf0cf12d0 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new 48d12fc42b 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% af [...] new f1b498e031 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new 08ae9471ab 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 [...] new 44668fbe2a 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new ae6ca3a5bf 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] new 8b7e021c05 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% a [...] new f93c3749f9 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 0150ecacb3 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 7b3758f302 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% [...] new 444fb7517e 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% [...] new 69980258dd 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 9889d4371c 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 06c4584e1e 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 4c5456b52b 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: n [...] new a43a6246b7 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 50727d1623 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 32906d572a 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new d31319e090 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 9ab98bd42d 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 168e5b86cc 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new c6566f32b0 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new cbfd88d24b 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 0f5140b1fd 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 58226c2681 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 1c089c738d 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 9dea208a69 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 02eeb86650 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 67b708f54b 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new b694d6403a 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new c38c02d146 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new b048c40801 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (9608a5ed30) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 101 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2368 -> 2380 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2644 -> 2656 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27544 -> 27452 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz | Bin 17804 -> 17800 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 90384 -> 90656 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz | Bin 69912 -> 69940 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 368 -> 368 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 8568 -> 7820 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 234100 -> 234928 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/make-glibc.log.xz | Bin 185624 -> 185904 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 212800 -> 212940 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz | Bin 179720 -> 179148 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 144 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 142 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4176 -> 4220 bytes 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 6448 -> 6404 bytes git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- jenkins/build-name | 2 +- manifest.sh | 28 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 88 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 1 + results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 32 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 198 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 722563 ++++++++++----------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 712547 ++++++++++---------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 20816 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 722 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 40 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 192 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 701478 ++++++++++---------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 691464 ++++++++++---------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 20702 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 824 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-full.csv | 212 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-internal.csv | 80 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results.csv | 80 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 35 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 80 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 4012 +- results_id | 2 +- 43 files changed, 1417240 insertions(+), 1459318 deletions(-)