This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O2 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O2.
discards 1cdbb2f9d onsuccess: #105: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards bd0452312 onsuccess: #104: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards bf9d6aea8 onsuccess: #103: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards c5b8e0e3c onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 7500fdece onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 05c0c1089 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 5cdfc9a59 onsuccess: #99: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 6bb660194 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 740697012 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 3ad5989c2 onsuccess: #93: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards b437b3a55 onsuccess: #87: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 8fedeb808 onsuccess: #78: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards f5265bf74 onsuccess: #73: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 6ae7bf629 onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 5d78f1059 onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 0f3bb0589 117: onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards a1adc01d3 116: onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 2b8ce64d7 115: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards f00d31710 114: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 7624fefa7 113: onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards d24cb55aa 112: force: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards b1cb61c52 111: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 6dcda7d87 110: force: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards aa261d40c 109: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards c4d759b3c 108: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 5fa332a35 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 553c832a7 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards ce9f7676c 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards f56bff6e2 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards f270cfddd 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards e7f86307c 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 4462c312d 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 4280b9cd5 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-48462- [...] discards b54dfa66c 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits discards d639a1afc 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 231 commits discards 4d1a9f6ee 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits discards 99c6b5405 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 134500a06 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits discards b8fd2a56d 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 58 [...] discards 2c9dc455a 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits discards 5025a7b9b 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/lin [...] discards 5a40c7a75 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 9256cf8f4 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 1d74a85b8 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] discards 030ccc0fc 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] discards 066e49e8c 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 0c0d0cb4a 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] discards 74b84af71 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gli [...] discards 92c84be11 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] discards 79b57f110 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% a [...] discards d6d7f87fe 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% af [...] discards 9427f2c8d 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% a [...] discards 10fc7e396 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-45596 [...] discards 20d82c5db 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -21 [...] discards 785a2f97e 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 6e9fbe0c3 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 56bbf032b 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 2dd7d297c 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 commits discards 2fc7ede50 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards 5ae1159f8 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits discards 91028fe72 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_step_ [...] discards 100775734 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] discards 68d30e101 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] discards 4ddc5cab1 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 2102d1131 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 02a3f6010 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc-1 [...] discards ebaf0d8c6 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards 2d6f7b23c 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 commits discards 8a2032841 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slowe [...] discards 0bbfabb84 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] discards d4587a44a 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards 2a3f2962d 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchpoi [...] discards cd98b46fe 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build af [...] discards 89d535e30 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 39cc0e51b 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 023f1e3d5 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 64505 [...] discards 851743ea3 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK af [...] discards fe5979768 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] discards 520a007ff 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 15df8a74b 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after gd [...] discards d13f8f4b7 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bin [...] discards b9e40ac97 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 3fcfe8623 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 396be8faa 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 3a018b50f 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK a [...] discards fa8b90c36 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards d4e6027b0 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards db053c604 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run O [...] discards 80ce4bb2e 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK afte [...] discards 1fd6e276f 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after b [...] discards 495108818 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 135a87174 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards 9198b07b7 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...] discards 1d9e05bb1 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards a96994463 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits discards 49286f205 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards 9151f03b3 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 0 [...] discards 315953fcc 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run [...] discards b8af0c620 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards 8e19a00a3 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] discards bd1970edc 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] discards eba569d50 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 21% [...] discards 9775ce3df 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards b460c3740 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] discards f68b80fc0 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 4d252afa0 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 95b6c1344 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 9da8c9289 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits discards ea452d085 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards 00c579d0a 23: onsuccess: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 9034d3a3f 22: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards b070d29bc 21: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 12 commits discards 66e6deaba 20: force: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards d5c8ffa27 19: force: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 18% [...] discards 9db4d7d2d 18: onsuccess: #413: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 600bcaf09 17: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits discards b65229cb9 16: onsuccess: #410: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 8 [...] discards b8bdd254f 15: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 35 commits discards 2fb593599 14: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 208 commits discards 15988f98e 13: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards 9f8a71978 12: force: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 7c188804e 11: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bu [...] discards 62e085611 10: force: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp:[.] _ZN5cGate7deliv [...] new f11fe9f45 force: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk_ [...] new dc42b909a 11: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bu [...] new fb440c4ed 12: force: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new cc5ee93fc 13: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 6d84da743 14: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 208 commits new 22ad28ffe 15: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 35 commits new f37d4ec2e 16: onsuccess: #410: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 8 [...] new 2bf1b1241 17: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits new 0b417953b 18: onsuccess: #413: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new d65c9e5f8 19: force: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 18% [...] new 8c66ca383 20: force: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new da96e8881 21: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 12 commits new 4073a8fc6 22: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new a269fb0c6 23: onsuccess: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 5316f1944 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 02d7295c2 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits new 34eb62e20 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 80c32ae08 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 30493ff95 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new a299bbe30 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] new 16a588724 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 06bfd3c5c 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 21% [...] new 70f985638 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] new 64db70f13 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] new ac585ac8e 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new a4d9da244 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run [...] new a1876850f 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 0 [...] new a35b46343 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new b7f109172 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits new 2d813a73a 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new e8b5c01e6 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...] new 893a942e4 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 7fe484a05 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new b63a20698 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after b [...] new b1703d9a6 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK afte [...] new b97b2def6 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run O [...] new be6a8bde3 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new 1a8f4b6a6 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 3e281c843 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK a [...] new 36c7693c4 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new c64bf75f3 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 9437a40f9 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 91c38b4b2 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bin [...] new e991bc4c8 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after gd [...] new 23e3de00e 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 5d0b25f17 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new b3655f41b 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK af [...] new 9be29bdf1 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 64505 [...] new 76a40ede6 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new dd4742676 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new e9a2fca97 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build af [...] new 8b5653ede 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchpoi [...] new 9abd30818 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new ea6f90f24 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new f23d8dba3 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slowe [...] new dbb4f3752 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 commits new 6c32b0711 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new 480deab5e 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc-1 [...] new d3e902da8 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new 48c29a73f 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 407230303 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] new 5ae09571a 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] new 9428a4e8f 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_step_ [...] new b11422467 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits new a75df561b 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new 3c98fd1f1 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 commits new 5e9854e52 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new e165bc16e 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 0827db360 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new ae569e576 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -21 [...] new b44551122 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-45596 [...] new fe43f207d 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% a [...] new 5b05bd693 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% af [...] new 4b278aaf7 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% a [...] new 361fcaca3 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] new 51ac08eda 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gli [...] new 6e9028380 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] new 3891b0918 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new eb35261d1 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new b469ad1f3 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] new 1f44e5f87 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 3a05d707c 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 7297dda59 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/lin [...] new ecc09a9c4 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits new ef2bd18b5 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 58 [...] new d6767f4ad 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits new ba93dac22 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 28298a65f 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits new a70a2e784 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 231 commits new 2598b161c 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits new e71352a52 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-48462- [...] new 798ffc119 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 9d975dba8 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 6054a1e63 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 7796c038e 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new fa4d54e95 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 1559f4b60 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new a9ead6869 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 2c650dc7b 108: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 09f8c5aca 109: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 811596232 110: force: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 145420c35 111: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 04c5a8f1c 112: force: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 98932dda3 113: onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 831ffc22c 114: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 5c549f6b1 115: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 7637216a4 116: onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new eaeaeff5a 117: onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 8d43571d8 onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new c46fafc3e onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 792746cf0 onsuccess: #73: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 1ae867682 onsuccess: #78: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new c52b101f5 onsuccess: #87: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new cb8f00167 onsuccess: #93: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 4292ffb1f onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 6abe6dc48 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new ba546d32f onsuccess: #99: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 6f1f48c31 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 5ef35c5e8 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 61b99a6ff onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new b3750f56e onsuccess: #103: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new c076f527f onsuccess: #104: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 75b4fc06d onsuccess: #105: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]
This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:
* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (1cdbb2f9d) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]
You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.
Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.
The 123 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.
Summary of changes: