This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.

discards 4cd7e4b73d2 117: onsuccess: #82: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards c1a10bab8cd 116: force: #79: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] discards f64da8ae257 115: onsuccess: #77: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards c298ea4b556 114: onsuccess: #75: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 0eebbb3608a 113: onsuccess: #74: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 693c9ad4e2d 112: onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 8ec20c88186 111: onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 83b0f193130 110: onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards d7f41d52505 109: force: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] discards 50d4b3deb19 108: force: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] discards 32271bc2310 107: force: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] discards 543c083b68b 106: onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards b7b14bfc2f7 105: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 08cda69ebba 104: force: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] discards ca724f79470 103: force: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] discards c12657567fd 102: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 6fcc13357fb 101: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 152e88ba6a8 100: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 080fd7d62c2 99: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards bd0a51736a0 98: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] discards 7d467b729e5 97: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] discards ef41a81e2f5 96: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] discards bcb2048433b 95: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] discards 2bac1c4ef3f 94: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 63 commits discards 55ae58d0157 93: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/l [...] discards b77658059dc 92: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards abe6555d47e 91: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] discards 229ef18668d 90: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards a9e325f17f7 89: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards f650b9ec17a 88: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 6c822d35b40 87: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards efcbfed3e86 86: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 106 commits discards fce27ecdf65 85: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 16 [...] discards e95c8c38139 84: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -13% [...] discards a0bc4ffae24 83: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17 [...] discards 99db30d4957 82: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards d72630cb662 81: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 169 [...] discards dbc0b56c5f8 80: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 2507070d874 79: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 976dd5b5dda 78: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 19 [...] discards bb350d49e8d 77: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards cbd84cc231b 76: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 11 [...] discards c06e2a5d377 75: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards c8fbed10672 74: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards cd9f57e4c12 73: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards e65eee21719 72: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 commits discards 628e6ea8e42 71: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits discards 9b07b5cc8b9 70: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards 8c874bad71f 69: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 7b7a4de52d5 68: force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20 [...] discards b892633d391 67: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 4ac5ddbde80 66: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards bf015aa7e2a 65: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 7e8c24a0995 64: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 7ef5165542f 63: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 555f6769790 62: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 341 commits discards 7c70c83084e 61: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards eae4d10e2ec 60: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 9 commits discards f0341918d4e 59: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards c90863914eb 58: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20 [...] discards 4b532833cae 57: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 67f14749dfa 56: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] discards 19b7c2193a1 55: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.900 [...] discards 6d4e8f1a3d2 54: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards e27c237c0a0 53: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] discards 21a6835d94e 52: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] discards 3dad010343e 51: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards f02ca9b6a2b 50: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] discards 93a5408b474 49: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after b [...] discards 705a435001f 48: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits discards 4471bfa492d 47: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 54 commits discards 444e4c3b80f 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK af [...] discards f4db42efa44 45: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards ce6f3d85f0d 44: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after b [...] discards b96bfffcc48 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 67947bd0438 42: onsuccess: #543: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.3 [...] discards bfd19a283c6 41: onsuccess: #541: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK [...] discards e52f324cdfb 40: force: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards f810adac335 39: onsuccess: #535: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 78c37d11b0b 38: force: #524: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 878ac0eb56a 37: force: #523: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray:[.] _ZN3pov17Check [...] discards 6fa0d055b2c 36: force: #522: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards 3b311f8a210 35: onsuccess: #520: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards d4825a5f2b3 34: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 13f9dabec57 33: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 58e46d998fe 32: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards 769c44d7d22 31: onsuccess: #512: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 4ac9b458e64 30: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 86 commits discards 1a0354bf15f 29: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards faa5d58e956 28: onsuccess: #507: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards e39d9c1c8db 27: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 0ace832f6bb 26: onsuccess: #505: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards ae358f24d92 25: force: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gc [...] discards 6b3e5256dd8 24: force: #503: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 71 commits discards 80e635160fb 23: force: #501: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gc [...] discards 177f48a7c7b 22: force: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref:[.] __memcpy_neon [...] discards 112424e6fab 21: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards f87c0217905 20: onsuccess: #496: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 103 commits discards 1d280e0c49c 19: force: #495: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 slowed down by 4% [...] discards 5fb627c472b 18: force: #494: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 96 commits discards d7624fe79c8 17: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 9a395fba0fc 17: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new d97c76ca5be 18: force: #494: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 96 commits new cbed9ec4e05 19: force: #495: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 slowed down by 4% [...] new 89823564b16 20: onsuccess: #496: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 103 commits new 8a04fc24267 21: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 2e985a5e54a 22: force: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref:[.] __memcpy_neon [...] new 9defa4e8a0b 23: force: #501: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gc [...] new 83696a0bca5 24: force: #503: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 71 commits new abd4d99e2ae 25: force: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gc [...] new bf0246e257a 26: onsuccess: #505: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new 39fbc3479a2 27: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 38610636329 28: onsuccess: #507: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new cee2bcf2b6d 29: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 3502d0631ef 30: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 86 commits new 978f549bb8e 31: onsuccess: #512: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 06599e88a91 32: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 159b610d07d 33: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 27d8469fa32 34: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 5341d0ebaaf 35: onsuccess: #520: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new d609e946462 36: force: #522: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new adb98bb7313 37: force: #523: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray:[.] _ZN3pov17Check [...] new 5809fe32820 38: force: #524: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 546358d8a31 39: onsuccess: #535: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new b842ddeb9f0 40: force: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 818a8186520 41: onsuccess: #541: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK [...] new 4817b4792b4 42: onsuccess: #543: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.3 [...] new 8cbf28bc7b0 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new f1d1502d0ed 44: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after b [...] new eccf7376d9b 45: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 4880b556a3b 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK af [...] new b4645a48bbc 47: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 54 commits new d3c09ad6b51 48: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits new 0662d2d4a21 49: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after b [...] new 41fb896c690 50: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] new 61d3fbb4b39 51: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 140fbbd303e 52: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] new 6badfb9cc03 53: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] new ae410940ec8 54: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 0069617e214 55: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.900 [...] new fbcf2031a8d 56: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] new 1eaee016815 57: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new e3820b010de 58: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20 [...] new 53540da14fa 59: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 0e58ba868c6 60: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 9 commits new 27370ce4df5 61: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new 67377665a26 62: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 341 commits new 1404b41dbb3 63: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 8dd6e2686c4 64: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 65b9bc6fa42 65: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 4e6b6689374 66: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new e099a57d1e4 67: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 90b44ad1867 68: force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20 [...] new c505881266e 69: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new b4df84eae85 70: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new fe1be208b00 71: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits new 8af648095b9 72: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 commits new bf4c4192bec 73: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 957a4a5ff39 74: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 6bd8ba89835 75: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new a4086bb5033 76: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 11 [...] new 7564f8562c2 77: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 3e5d4df45da 78: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 19 [...] new 55400a64c7a 79: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new cee6cb5bebc 80: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 17082575eeb 81: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 169 [...] new e0dadf85420 82: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new 09d8457f82c 83: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17 [...] new fe8a9ebcde6 84: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -13% [...] new c0a127388ff 85: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 16 [...] new c6d56cc7790 86: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 106 commits new 74042db2c2d 87: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 83b4d6dc8b1 88: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 6569dd5fb05 89: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 3bc82387b72 90: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new bfbc0e2d546 91: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] new 95d71b9b16d 92: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 5fed86a162c 93: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/l [...] new dc1376c73c6 94: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 63 commits new 5264aefc20b 95: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] new 9a45383ce54 96: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] new f98c7e7f97f 97: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] new 48947d9baa0 98: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] new ae0d579f1c3 99: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 9f29d546bcb 100: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 0a93003ac45 101: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new cd394a5ceeb 102: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new e7da4704c0e 103: force: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] new fb1094609b9 104: force: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] new c6bb23fe83a 105: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 16ccc8ae052 106: onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 13983d42da1 107: force: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] new 6defbf97c11 108: force: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] new 637346b73b6 109: force: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] new 01d2f70eab7 110: onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 3b40da41516 111: onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 0743362ee3d 112: onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 6c19358cc68 113: onsuccess: #74: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 344bbfcbbf0 114: onsuccess: #75: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 6cf482ae2ce 115: onsuccess: #77: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new dba72ac93c7 116: force: #79: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] new 9975ee483bb 117: onsuccess: #82: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new d5846c4ccd6 118: onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (4cd7e4b73d2) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2352 -> 2336 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2632 -> 2636 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27556 -> 27828 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz | Bin 17740 -> 17796 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 91396 -> 90584 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz | Bin 70260 -> 70232 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 368 -> 368 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 7772 -> 8736 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 235180 -> 234776 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/make-glibc.log.xz | Bin 185860 -> 185576 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 212204 -> 212188 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz | Bin 178764 -> 179608 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 132 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 130 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4160 -> 4152 bytes 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 194 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 17916 -> 18756 bytes .../output-bmk-results/diff-bmk-results.out | 6 +- .../output-bmk-results/exe.improvement | 3 + ...ymbol.improvement.diff => exe.improvement.diff} | 0 .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression | 4 + ...symbol.improvement.diff => exe.regression.diff} | 0 .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement | 4 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression | 7 +- 11-update_baseline/console.log | 72 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- manifest.sh | 20 +- results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 249 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 2808 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/results.csv | 760016 ++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/size.csv | 762516 ++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 30624 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 908 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 3049 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3263 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 750229 ++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 763703 ++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 29979 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 1182 +- results-vs-first/csvs2table-results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-first/csvs2table-results-full.csv | 3373 +- results-vs-first/csvs2table-results-internal.csv | 253 +- results-vs-first/csvs2table-results.csv | 253 +- results-vs-first/interesting-symbols.csv | 107 +- results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 253 +- results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3762 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 253 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 9 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 3181 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 3324 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 759398 +++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 773400 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 30664 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 1316 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 3049 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3263 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 750229 ++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 763703 ++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 29979 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 1182 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-full.csv | 3463 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-internal.csv | 253 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results.csv | 253 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 107 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 253 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3934 +- results_id | 2 +- 68 files changed, 3117472 insertions(+), 3130980 deletions(-) create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.improvement copy 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/{symbol.improvement.diff => exe.improv [...] create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.regression copy 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/{symbol.improvement.diff => exe.regres [...]