This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O2 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.

discards a43da826204 onsuccess: #93: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 93989629c3f onsuccess: #87: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards c01cf183edc onsuccess: #78: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards cc0de126388 onsuccess: #73: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 203c4aaf0c9 onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 7f111b021dc onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards abaa0fdd4e1 117: onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards af1259912d2 116: onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards cd54c1770f3 115: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 613e1096770 114: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards d145c35b1f6 113: onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards b2d25b132e6 112: force: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] discards 7b3d0f6e614 111: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] discards 51e6700da43 110: force: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] discards f4064140e16 109: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 9a4742bcf13 108: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards cff0e20d278 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards dd2f81e2afb 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 403e4ca4faa 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards 2b05082cc04 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards a9d8128b22b 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards edb1d979734 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] discards d218f681f4c 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gc [...] discards d8c4790cfd1 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-4846 [...] discards c5137af9967 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits discards 3335827005f 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 23 [...] discards b3b076f1901 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits discards 7d8621f541f 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards d8e369ab082 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits discards 30d757150c0 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards c5c9b2d78a7 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits discards 4ee8f1c3b36 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/l [...] discards 16bce2a114c 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 89d995a2d7b 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards e005b86ed2c 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25 [...] discards 39c00e57fc1 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 9e5ace8b818 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards dde7b30f244 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] discards b39c7f9385f 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 179cab5efa2 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards feb624a5596 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 0b21bb553ce 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% [...] discards 2a303722178 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] discards 19d759804c5 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-455 [...] discards d63eb9bc0dc 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 79ac989de6f 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 8bdbee86cb0 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 350c47b0b31 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 8f92914d9d6 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 [...] discards 14ba5ca988e 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards 875e3d5820b 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits discards 0296b631c28 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_ste [...] discards 340c0be6420 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25 [...] discards 1ddbe8c1484 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 5e110534411 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards eb7004ee803 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 1e5247d2f7c 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards b9ab7cab9c2 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards 0de7600c00c 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 1e8d0080f1b 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slo [...] discards 87101d90024 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] discards f4d645e9a22 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards 35b4a4e4323 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchp [...] discards 81226df5ae3 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] discards 67f0407d01e 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] discards 31d2e378e57 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] discards 76fccd27c86 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 645 [...] discards d8ca3b8573f 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK [...] discards 017427fbd50 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 2404d493ffa 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] discards 0854ba1dd29 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after [...] discards fe2c9a5f70e 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after b [...] discards b09e78da74d 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 24ae8b8ec7f 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 1dbf203ed14 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 33fe679d8ea 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards 232e625ba7a 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build afte [...] discards b8e5b5f3872 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards bd513392acb 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards 14e1d0c3da3 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK af [...] discards 6179e16f911 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards fc2acf3c5db 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 2393d61a6be 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and r [...] discards 1387d6e5123 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 569bc62059d 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] discards 81eebbca8d9 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 [...] discards 287b144257c 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards 7ff8c40bf0f 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 71793055bef 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and ru [...] discards a7e271b34f1 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build [...] discards 62034e44ecb 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards caa62416327 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% a [...] discards ab6bcc71570 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 2 [...] discards f5fbbd79401 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 9750ed32a63 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 3 [...] discards 40d7a6878d1 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 97ce946bf5a 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] discards 0785ae4e1ba 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards 74958b27308 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits discards 5fa75cfdcef 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 8635bbe66f2 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 07beecd5f41 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits new 13b806d7ec2 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 0922e2cd04f 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/ [...] new 70589c71690 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 7c7e6475409 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 3 [...] new 21e4f8ccf8d 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 0b820fe75c4 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 2 [...] new 9d43549b2e3 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% a [...] new 2ca8816acfe 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new f93fd97fb88 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build [...] new a0c09b6e112 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and ru [...] new cad889bcbe7 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new dc0abf81c01 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new 898e043b71e 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 [...] new ac90ca170c5 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] new cc96faad56b 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 6173f699c21 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and r [...] new 47d75c7e1c6 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 2ac53f231de 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new e4843d921b5 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK af [...] new b2002d403f4 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new f7948e031b1 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new 03722c6b73c 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build afte [...] new d3291152824 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new d714c69008f 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 29dbc05055e 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 4cb1fa01f17 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 5931b640d33 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after b [...] new b4e310785ca 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after [...] new a7994d6a7c8 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] new 279b4d88d9b 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 3e0aaa5da3a 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK [...] new e25ac0420b3 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 645 [...] new f48fd492df1 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] new 829a9bebf48 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build afte [...] new fd04ef5ec27 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] new 013634f92a8 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchp [...] new 77f31792403 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new 110067aee94 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] new 3c914100828 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slo [...] new d89a1c69fbc 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 305c7c6ee8b 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new e21fbc55073 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new 8e61a18f395 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new e79b5fdb480 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 43db99c40a4 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 672608ab66f 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25 [...] new ae67f61b479 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_ste [...] new acc2c6543ba 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits new 81d13cb0063 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new b7128609b20 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 [...] new 7a89c3f97c3 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 7181f86c8ba 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 181585581aa 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 192cf471433 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 589a8629670 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-455 [...] new 3e6065a2fee 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] new 2d1d7a171ae 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% [...] new 0b1ed4a9e0f 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 7ca84443b33 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new a4cea874b71 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 6e1883b803f 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] new 84e5f35f594 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 2b9b2ed40ea 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 4074ab6b9c7 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25 [...] new 6ba1c10cdba 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 3aad2c9d73b 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new c845b542ac9 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/l [...] new 8d283e9b830 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits new bdcf53e6e15 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 09bd90f58ba 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits new bf6a9f2e2c9 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 5b00fcbd163 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits new 711ac36140f 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 23 [...] new 17b67340c70 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits new efb74e11fe0 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-4846 [...] new c292975ee20 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gc [...] new 7e4f0038e42 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 8a1908d6eb2 103: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 123025d5f80 104: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new d90145de5e5 105: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 9bf871ea4bf 106: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 7333fb72169 107: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new e12e6af9c6b 108: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new ead3a0c13f0 109: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new bca7dd4a6d2 110: force: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] new 59b57b2f29e 111: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] new e5eec57239b 112: force: #64: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcw [...] new aa7e43c10b7 113: onsuccess: #65: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 2b304672dc3 114: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 54d53e4fd6b 115: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new f97e28a301c 116: onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new b98cae5eef0 117: onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job [...] new 7ed6ce95eb1 onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 0650c1b4465 onsuccess: #72: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new cd6dc5a4c4e onsuccess: #73: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new db940e76f66 onsuccess: #78: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 55b00308bcd onsuccess: #87: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 897410174ba onsuccess: #93: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new f2bdc9e66a5 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (a43da826204) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 101 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2268 -> 2304 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2656 -> 2608 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 28628 -> 28588 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz | Bin 17832 -> 17716 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 91804 -> 92048 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz | Bin 71620 -> 71772 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 368 -> 368 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 8604 -> 8548 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 233248 -> 233776 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/make-glibc.log.xz | Bin 185224 -> 185736 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 214056 -> 213144 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz | Bin 181176 -> 180928 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 129 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 127 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 7512 -> 7832 bytes 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 148 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 3224 -> 3268 bytes 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results.log | 420 +- git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- git/linux_rev | 2 +- jenkins/build-name | 2 +- jenkins/rewrite.log | 6 +- jenkins/run-build.env | 12 +- manifest.sh | 12 +- notify/jira/comments.txt | 2 +- notify/mail-body.txt | 54 +- notify/mail-subject.txt | 2 +- notify/notify-full.log | 304 +- notify/notify-init.log | 88 +- results-vs-prev/cmp-results.diff | 176 - results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 257 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 191 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 4629 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 100306 ++- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 773239 ++++++++++---------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 23390 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 46 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 177 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3327 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 42342 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 684073 +++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 20769 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 34 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-full.csv | 3541 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-internal.csv | 257 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results.csv | 257 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 101 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 257 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 4376 +- results_id | 2 +- 53 files changed, 828684 insertions(+), 834445 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 results-vs-prev/cmp-results.diff