This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO.

discards 2c37353 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 65b164d onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards d498933 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 23dd7f5 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards e4250f8 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards ab85579 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards a79fe70 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 0cf198e 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 8ad9e91 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 3938a59 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 707ba13 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 0f9cfa7 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 19d7802 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards b963a64 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 16a16ac 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards e2a0d47 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards ac61bd0 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 8ac2f44 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards e02f64c 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 6b9f1da 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards dea9fff 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] discards 64d4243 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] discards 750dffb 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 6901dcd 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] discards 6b84fff 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 6e8a73d 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 26301bf 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] discards e23de3a 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards bca5d8b 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 4bcfbbf 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] discards 89ff994 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] discards 674f17a 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards 9cf9fc7 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits discards 5fe9c98 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] discards 690bada 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] discards f2a6e60 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits discards b47af43 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards efd5eed 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards 085c840 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards f4c79dd 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 8be864c 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards b023ea4 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards 338a263 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] discards a6e9efa 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards b5fddd8 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] discards 268ca72 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 6e02511 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] discards 9d46d47 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 5dbffc0 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards ef4e745 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 6823d81 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards a9ae218 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards ad636b9 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards ee541ae 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] discards 9d79b0e 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 7a6d624 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards db7dba7 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] discards ee980a7 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 3e77944 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 8dfad96 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] discards f8478c6 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] discards 2473028 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards ffa1321 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 0f157c5 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] discards b4da0f5 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards 4199f0c 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards d0836ab 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] discards c77d23e 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits discards cd25140 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards 0a3993f 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits discards 8fe653f 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] discards 0bfea7d 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards 1b95334 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards b2d2ed8 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards c467ad2 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards c0e38e3 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 92c18e2 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 63576b6 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 142542c 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards b9160d4 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 4096939 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 12c40b6 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards e039a75 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] discards cd2a458 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards 23a3480 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits discards 3cad2c5 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] discards df4b681 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards f44f934 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits discards 9dd3b30 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 09e11ad 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards d340584 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] discards 30d78be 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits discards 27a692f 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 03ca1d3 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards d14ef9c 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards e4ee9af 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] discards c37e12a 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards c40697d 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 93e5fcd 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards af1ba66 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b032e34 12: onsuccess: #396: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 4317f13 13: onsuccess: #397: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new eb6035d 14: onsuccess: #399: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new d1ff3dd 15: onsuccess: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 4d5e0eb 16: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray speeds up by -6% [...] new 9ff3076 17: onsuccess: #408: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 536bd69 18: onsuccess: #411: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new fc0356b 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b6a63c3 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits new ef240ec 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] new 75d8a3f 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new c2a8a30 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 700254d 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits new 2fa8c98 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new 56063bd 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] new 4c255a6 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits new 034a9c7 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new 68554c1 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new 2a1bb09 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new f6cd9d6 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e8257e1 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new bc9093e 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 9fa8f2b 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b7a6333 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new ea21057 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new aa836e0 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 3d1c0b1 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new ac3b37d 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new f17d849 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 835d8ae 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] new 388b4b4 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new ab62439 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 065fa97 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits new 17c9c50 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new 3548756 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new f8c434d 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new c447b71 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new 63654a4 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new ee410bb 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new aad086d 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] new adc438b 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] new 878b1dd 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new b29f551 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 2f3e45e 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new 4088ad7 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 3e7c20c 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 0a27a6a 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] new 2ec68c7 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 55fdf5c 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 106424c 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 5e30848 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new b4e7bac 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new a4e285e 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new b2f280f 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] new 5e5b7da 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 1b1a3d9 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new c17141c 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 19fddef 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] new 7f593a3 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new c38984c 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 5c4c38c 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 976a639 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new ddaa99e 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new ccceee9 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new 4beded9 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new 54e915d 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] new d54eafb 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] new 6c625ba 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits new 593d5eb 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new fd5c635 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new 4db577e 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] new 57c0f14 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 6369d59 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 7467a44 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new 2258063 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] new f03d6d5 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new b9eb231 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new c30cbcb 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 3eac925 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new f273521 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new 75efac5 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 2f801cb 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 99b2ded 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 436cfb8 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new c39ea3d 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new edd27bb 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 6f5d4f6 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new b75ab70 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new a6b190a 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 70b2537 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new b84afa2 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 17b0f41 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 25bebad 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 0cda9b3 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 1c87d4d onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 340a950 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 97ed113 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 753520e onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 43d625a onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 703887a onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 0d011fb onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (2c37353) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 101 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2604 -> 2556 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2708 -> 2636 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27940 -> 27968 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz | Bin 17704 -> 17720 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 94428 -> 92856 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz | Bin 72060 -> 72484 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 368 -> 368 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 7900 -> 8548 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 235328 -> 233372 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/make-glibc.log.xz | Bin 185504 -> 185476 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 221652 -> 215820 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz | Bin 182604 -> 184416 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 117 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 193 - 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 3412 -> 3468 bytes 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 22 - 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 5720 -> 5712 bytes 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results.log | 144 +- annex/bmk-data | 2 +- git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- git/linux_rev | 2 +- jenkins/build-name | 2 +- jenkins/notify-full.log | 2821 +- jenkins/notify-init.log | 108 +- jenkins/rewrite.log | 24 +- jenkins/run-build.env | 6 +- manifest.sh | 6 +- .../extra-bisect-params | 0 notify/jira/comments.txt | 2 +- notify/mail-body.txt | 63 +- notify/mail-subject.txt | 2 +- notify/output-bmk-results.log | 1960 + notify/summary.txt | 1 - results-vs-prev/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 22 + results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 78 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 44 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 181 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 4686 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 583297 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 20544 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 762 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 52 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 178 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 6935 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 535116 ++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 20322 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 822 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-brief.csv | 66 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-full.csv | 200 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results-internal.csv | 78 +- results-vs-prev/csvs2table-results.csv | 78 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 30 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 78 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 4312 +- 56 files changed, 589930 insertions(+), 593432 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 09-benchmark/benchmark.log delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv copy {10-check_regression => notify}/extra-bisect-params (100%) create mode 100644 notify/output-bmk-results.log delete mode 100644 notify/summary.txt create mode 100644 results-vs-prev/bmk-specific-variability.csv