This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.

discards dbcf180063 110: onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 39f1ba398b 109: force: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 0c7b57eecc 108: force: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards ad0db8002f 107: force: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 1536daa231 106: onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 0e04cdb130 105: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 9ea03d2b35 104: force: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards ecf275bc56 103: force: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 45bda8803c 102: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards b36d9b2312 101: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 2ff5a2d69a 100: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 257f4aef02 99: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards a1e36f4a65 98: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 9fa62ac809 97: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 5ef5e8f92e 96: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 451f4c8212 95: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 4904bcd5b6 94: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 63 commits discards 6bfd10ac68 93: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] discards 5fdcaf182a 92: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 58e471e405 91: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] discards 43a875393b 90: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards d9edc2a77c 89: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 435095c92a 88: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 47ac979cc7 87: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 7534281779 86: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 106 commits discards 1fe590302a 85: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 16% [...] discards 3a938d4425 84: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -13% [...] discards c18690cf5e 83: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 7a4a6318fc 82: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards 21a4341a2d 81: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1696 [...] discards 8b98aa714c 80: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards f87369db52 79: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 9 [...] discards ee372a34d7 78: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 19% [...] discards d6bc06313d 77: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards a42def6da1 76: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 11% [...] discards b53015dec1 75: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards ee4639a1bb 74: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] discards 9e044f57a1 73: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 4687720128 72: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 commits discards f94c08c026 71: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits discards e55c7aa6f5 70: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards dee3d450ad 69: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards fba06ab820 68: force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards f3b93a5b4d 67: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 3b8b7094f3 66: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 8580e6c66e 65: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards ceecda67db 64: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 0107657b63 63: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards ce289ef358 62: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 341 commits discards 2ae19d9b60 61: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards d34d9dbcd0 60: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 9 commits discards 1dbc259189 59: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards 8516a1fd0d 58: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards e61b218084 57: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards a378ce0e17 56: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards c30cf197d3 55: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.9000 [...] discards 757acbac8d 54: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] discards cb58be620d 53: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] discards 0b85ac9ba6 52: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 964f1359f0 51: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] discards 755508793e 50: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards ddfddae540 49: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] discards 28707cc8f8 48: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits discards cf65bcf8c3 47: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 54 commits discards d327efe445 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] discards c3786e43f1 45: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 55babbaa11 44: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] discards 1c4902cf04 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -7 [...] discards 7b8224ce23 42: onsuccess: #543: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36 [...] discards fe59529e41 41: onsuccess: #541: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK a [...] discards 62b8d39524 40: force: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards d00c0889eb 39: onsuccess: #535: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 0103b51e1f 38: force: #524: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 98a063b82c 37: force: #523: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray:[.] _ZN3pov17Check_ [...] discards 105ad38d99 36: force: #522: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 959d331ba7 35: onsuccess: #520: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 82487e3e3a 34: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 14d2ad896e 33: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 222b85c28f 32: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards f18f739bdb 31: onsuccess: #512: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 787719c535 30: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 86 commits discards 8958dbd379 29: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 44c87eb249 28: onsuccess: #507: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 7943922642 27: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 1bbab2dbe6 26: onsuccess: #505: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards f23d29a9dc 25: force: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards 96946562e0 24: force: #503: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 71 commits discards eb97912416 23: force: #501: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards 5d261ad7bb 22: force: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref:[.] __memcpy_neon [...] discards a4e2fe2a4f 21: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 1881505069 20: onsuccess: #496: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 103 commits discards 297390e7d0 19: force: #495: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 slowed down by 4% [...] discards 7ecb2ba754 18: force: #494: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 96 commits discards 9fd30e8d2a 17: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 60c9de0579 16: force: #489: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards cdafec60be 15: onsuccess: #488: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 122 [...] discards daf87ffc0d 14: onsuccess: #487: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits discards 2d20266627 13: onsuccess: #483: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 speeds up by - [...] discards de2fe97166 12: onsuccess: #482: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 02a669cff8 11: onsuccess: #479: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 64bc705501 10: onsuccess: #478: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new c96a7ddd57 10: onsuccess: #478: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 2db19f79fe 11: onsuccess: #479: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new becc91fcf6 12: onsuccess: #482: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new f2419028f2 13: onsuccess: #483: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 speeds up by - [...] new 2a9c50fe78 14: onsuccess: #487: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits new 8211cbc810 15: onsuccess: #488: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 122 [...] new 2265a3841c 16: force: #489: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 745653b6cc 17: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 111dde5246 18: force: #494: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 96 commits new 945814e733 19: force: #495: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 slowed down by 4% [...] new 66f3e0227d 20: onsuccess: #496: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 103 commits new f65735f80b 21: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 49ddc84159 22: force: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref:[.] __memcpy_neon [...] new cad13bad0d 23: force: #501: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new 3bafcb31db 24: force: #503: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 71 commits new 081a1b847a 25: force: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new b8074716ce 26: onsuccess: #505: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new 0c9e662b0b 27: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 985b1a5bca 28: onsuccess: #507: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new b4d85586c2 29: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 5fa4296a83 30: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 86 commits new e8acdca7e5 31: onsuccess: #512: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 57b902181d 32: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new ca3b88fc2a 33: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 42a3f25830 34: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 29d2a35904 35: onsuccess: #520: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 3ae73026f4 36: force: #522: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new f90decb972 37: force: #523: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray:[.] _ZN3pov17Check_ [...] new 87d54f4f89 38: force: #524: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 867a9f55de 39: onsuccess: #535: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 2bdc31abec 40: force: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 296e9c8ad0 41: onsuccess: #541: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK a [...] new a8b067b638 42: onsuccess: #543: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36 [...] new d4e6265f07 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -7 [...] new 5d8027019f 44: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] new eaedf100a5 45: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new aa225411dd 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] new c131a3d776 47: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 54 commits new 2a61411232 48: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits new c735d43ecb 49: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] new db627eec78 50: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new 8d012f3550 51: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] new 75cc0de8ae 52: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 2163a52c98 53: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] new 7180bcc5bd 54: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] new 6697f429da 55: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.9000 [...] new 87c04cf6e5 56: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 109a40c366 57: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 92d43df215 58: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new b44ac1f587 59: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new d2af81e017 60: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 9 commits new 316c5831b0 61: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new a5dbf7318a 62: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 341 commits new fd438d54ca 63: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 3a2f76b5b3 64: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e2e970c217 65: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 1b20fd52fd 66: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 76c861919c 67: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 680f0e7a01 68: force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 497b10e2ad 69: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 1c19e49a49 70: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new 505a04be27 71: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits new 81bb809ef7 72: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 commits new 6bb1cb1214 73: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 2f4dff69f0 74: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] new b3b6af1675 75: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new 92a20d916c 76: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 11% [...] new 61fea19426 77: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 04009577e9 78: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 19% [...] new ea5532f671 79: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 9 [...] new 3ca54268f6 80: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new d8ae47a32e 81: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1696 [...] new 647a3ff0e8 82: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new 5ad6d377a1 83: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new b58abedb90 84: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -13% [...] new 2cccf4dfec 85: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 16% [...] new 0ebabd6f6d 86: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 106 commits new a50826a38a 87: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 659fdea07f 88: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 1edfd8f6a7 89: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ad9336e43e 90: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 7e1dc0e965 91: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] new 34e634c833 92: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new d10e2bf547 93: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] new 59fe31052d 94: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 63 commits new c3281c2c6c 95: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 81db390d71 96: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 159f6daf66 97: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 81bc126590 98: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new c75e095f7b 99: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 4658bb2adb 100: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 531ea1a318 101: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new ebcc5afd79 102: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 2929907f40 103: force: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 547bc33188 104: force: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 1d30a5ea13 105: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 72104324c5 106: onsuccess: #59: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 6d60e345b4 107: force: #60: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 9de2fab9e6 108: force: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 8db7f9b456 109: force: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 8a5afd8696 110: onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 255d640db7 111: onsuccess: #71: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (dbcf180063) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 1948 -> 2192 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2420 -> 2460 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27148 -> 26992 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 90568 -> 90344 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 336 -> 336 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 8568 -> 8416 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 233528 -> 233016 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 211872 -> 210920 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 140 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 138 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4204 -> 4168 bytes 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 156 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 19512 -> 18568 bytes 10-check_regression/exe.improvement | 1 - 10-check_regression/extra-bisect-params | 2 +- .../output-bmk-results/exe.improvement | 5 +- .../output-bmk-results/exe.improvement.diff | 5 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement | 6 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement.diff | 2 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression | 5 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression.diff | 2 +- 11-update_baseline/console.log | 70 +- git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- git/linux_rev | 2 +- mail/exe.improvement | 1 - manifest.sh | 29 +- results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 235 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 24 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/results.csv | 24 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2662 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3326 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 10251 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 606204 ++++++++-------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 23768 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 420 +- results-vs-first/interesting-symbols.csv | 155 +- results-vs-first/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-first/results-full.csv | 3217 +- results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 249 +- results-vs-first/results.csv | 249 +- results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3632 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 243 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 9 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 2705 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 3315 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 6204 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 677010 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 28616 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 502 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2662 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3326 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 10251 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 606204 ++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 23768 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 420 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 155 +- results-vs-prev/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/results-full.csv | 3417 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 253 +- results-vs-prev/results.csv | 253 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3966 +- results_id | 2 +- 64 files changed, 1022917 insertions(+), 1005486 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/exe.improvement delete mode 100644 mail/exe.improvement