This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O2 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.

discards 46c5c9c48a 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] discards 2f42aa5783 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-48462 [...] discards 9c11b035cd 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits discards 0a3fa4c44f 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 231 [...] discards 7ffb621b32 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits discards 311780f983 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards a7a19e0eab 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits discards 7118ac3354 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards 98728cd855 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits discards 666906ec91 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] discards ac6c571f15 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 7248714009 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards f2e36bccd1 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] discards df50894797 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 99e2799307 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards 8b1f28b6ca 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] discards 6e6f3c71e5 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 6431de4d6f 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards d018b62987 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards f8c6252820 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% a [...] discards 64b4e54df1 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] discards 4b9d2111fe 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-4559 [...] discards 51a4cfe885 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] discards 7ce6daf2f6 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 1112291516 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 970360cc33 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards ca47255fcc 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 commits discards 48ba2f8e11 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards a8f20ee8e1 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits discards 0276ebc76a 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_step [...] discards 7ada6bf7d6 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] discards 5816fea8fa 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 742294e469 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 2062b9c751 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] discards a0d409c099 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards 2013f97d31 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards 6a08178373 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 [...] discards 60934f2d04 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slow [...] discards eb0423fe73 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] discards 99a46f0f2a 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards 49e586a50f 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchpo [...] discards 277133fd3a 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards 7da160ab96 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards b594c8b3c5 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards a241a3bbc4 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 6450 [...] discards b68fdb8163 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK a [...] discards 40291a0ceb 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] discards 53d5868b53 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards ed50622038 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards 2256e19d4f 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bi [...] discards c3ce9bbda0 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 0e60bdb08f 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 77460a7800 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards cc11ae88bf 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards dec1e3a6a5 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards f67c3a7b13 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards 95dd85da45 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards 6354dbecbb 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] discards 9fc219cd05 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards fc1844a901 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards e782d6b0f2 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] discards 83f2e4b8fb 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 341d8dde8a 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] discards adfa2c8e2f 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits discards c37e1368e0 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits discards 385f12574d 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards bf1c9e2834 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run [...] discards 36923077b4 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] discards 8b0ded831b 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards bf3f9c1aea 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] discards dfeb5f6ec6 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 21 [...] discards e5d091a44e 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 5f0f550ddf 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] discards 233eed0290 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 5d792b5595 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards e25f16f2c5 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards a8b33ad661 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits discards 4b2302a485 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 402624e1ed 23: onsuccess: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 73541d6283 22: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 58ce4fc783 21: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 12 commits discards 30fd49ed2c 20: force: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards 8411a19fdc 19: force: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 18 [...] discards 8cb4c123c2 18: onsuccess: #413: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards 1e24da4f89 17: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits discards 12a4afecf1 16: onsuccess: #410: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 2e180f3d82 15: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 35 commits discards 3a01118aa6 14: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 208 commits discards 3f6ea39efc 13: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards beb4bb03a5 12: force: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards bc8122225d 11: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline b [...] discards f9faad48db 10: force: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp:[.] _ZN5cGate7deli [...] discards ad9e68b814 9: force: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards caa60c06ff 8: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 8565adc470 7: onsuccess: #391: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards e5dcec89c5 6: onsuccess: #390: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 8674edba85 5: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards e70a3c58bd 4: force: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] discards 00d2be7635 3: onsuccess: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 564 commits discards 07e8dbffc3 2: onsuccess: #384: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 3209 commits discards f2a4445951 1: onsuccess: #383: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...] new be8b8be848 1: onsuccess: #383: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 1 [...] new 714112c1ad 2: onsuccess: #384: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 3209 commits new e22bf5b0c1 3: onsuccess: #385: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 564 commits new 3dd5d8444b 4: force: #387: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] new 3372a7e7d2 5: onsuccess: #389: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 4619222672 6: onsuccess: #390: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 91932f7f3f 7: onsuccess: #391: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 47d75112c6 8: onsuccess: #392: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 1f3de5349e 9: force: #400: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 4e65a93b4f 10: force: #401: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp:[.] _ZN5cGate7deli [...] new 544369f0d0 11: onsuccess: #402: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline b [...] new eac6a4b6b1 12: force: #403: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 6070a98aec 13: onsuccess: #405: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new e3fa0b8d1c 14: onsuccess: #406: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 208 commits new 42a2f2e5a7 15: onsuccess: #407: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 35 commits new 2d1dd95d8b 16: onsuccess: #410: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 4907e2122d 17: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits new b81522a8f7 18: onsuccess: #413: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 16810ddff8 19: force: #419: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 18 [...] new 0c342b8d4b 20: force: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new af6dd98dd6 21: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 12 commits new 0a13734a27 22: force: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 0e011b5eb3 23: onsuccess: #423: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 796aaf9236 24: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 2d0c694459 25: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits new 85f89a33f5 26: force: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 1f3de905f2 27: onsuccess: #430: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new ce399101d8 28: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new bc3e548c57 29: force: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30 [...] new 7051993a80 30: onsuccess: #438: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 1d62a6f7c6 31: force: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 21 [...] new 8bce7eeb36 32: force: #445: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% af [...] new 75cf8fdc76 33: force: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new a23af88e8e 34: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build a [...] new 3f4e0879c1 35: onsuccess: #449: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run [...] new ae0fe69fea 36: onsuccess: #451: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 876eed5bdb 37: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new 5302b82944 38: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 31 commits new a15eeaa53b 39: force: #465: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build [...] new a5edde2924 40: onsuccess: #467: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 2add345bd5 41: onsuccess: #469: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and ru [...] new 28bf716cc4 42: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 4186be3601 43: force: #471: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 0a971e5eea 44: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] new 9f6ed38af6 45: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new aec7565f6f 46: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 59 commits new 690c1a2287 47: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new be3f7e15dd 48: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new 02cb056aa8 49: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new ff784999ad 50: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e86a37cce7 51: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 609ded46d9 52: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after bi [...] new 764c3ec8de 53: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 53d9d40bd5 54: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 6edda8b7fa 55: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] new 65a2d94133 56: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD built and run OK a [...] new a7b14cae57 57: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 6450 [...] new 05bf5066e0 58: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new a386cba211 59: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 31cb162fc8 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new b149119e1e 61: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gdb-13-branchpo [...] new 81d40bac5e 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new b701007dfd 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% aft [...] new 2f121176f4 64: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 400.perlbench:[.] S_regtry slow [...] new f6910b1170 65: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 2 [...] new 7f8ffe81a5 66: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new 2d5983f635 67: force: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new d462482c94 68: onsuccess: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new a6bed1a362 69: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 739e19db01 70: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new d2e5173461 71: force: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] new 70fe1f4081 72: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf:[.] __module_small_step [...] new 661e6cacd9 73: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 275 commits new 1e10efaf33 74: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new 0f59ec5a01 75: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 239 commits new d3c1ab21a8 76: force: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 70b9790925 77: onsuccess: #56: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 056c6f9812 78: onsuccess: #58: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new a06f2472c0 79: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -2 [...] new d68879c9fc 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.1.14-4559 [...] new 9fbd73139c 81: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 29% [...] new e0655035d4 82: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -15% a [...] new 9283827120 83: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new a413a168c4 84: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 0651cef7b8 85: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new e53ec254f2 86: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 30% [...] new 43505240ee 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% [...] new 1a6a1264b1 88: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 32128ae259 89: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 25% [...] new 43c0973dc6 90: onsuccess: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 60a2cf810b 91: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 2a30bc6fff 92: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] new 7e4eaa21f7 93: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 74 commits new 1cbbb5b71f 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 28437a3dc8 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 23 commits new adc7e908fb 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 02aefeb4da 97: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 139 commits new 217078eb26 98: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils: 231 [...] new 1857ce8adf 99: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after glibc: 26 commits new 6c679fea9a 100: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after v6.2.9-48462 [...] new 1aa96018eb 101: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc [...] new fea467302b 102: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (46c5c9c48a) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2344 -> 2068 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2520 -> 2556 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 26844 -> 27144 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 89496 -> 89384 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 336 -> 336 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 8372 -> 8376 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 232928 -> 233252 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 210144 -> 211440 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 170 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 168 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4368 -> 4300 bytes 10-check_regression/481.wrf.symbols-improvement | 1 - 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 145 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 19084 -> 16204 bytes 10-check_regression/extra-bisect-params | 2 +- 10-check_regression/mail-body.txt | 13 - 10-check_regression/mail-subject.txt | 1 - .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement | 3 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement.diff | 2 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression | 6 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression.diff | 2 +- 11-update_baseline/console.log | 70 +- dashboard/dashboard-generate.sh | 2 +- git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- git/linux_rev | 2 +- jenkins/notify.sh | 3 + mail/changes-list-long.txt | 20 - mail/changes-list-short.txt | 1 - mail/check-regression-status.txt | 1 + mail/last_good.sh | 31 - mail/short-diag.txt | 1 - manifest.sh | 38 +- results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 234 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 28 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/results.csv | 28 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2865 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3372 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 19054 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 620635 ++++++++-------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 23612 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 42 +- results-vs-first/interesting-symbols.csv | 130 +- results-vs-first/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-first/results-full.csv | 3239 +- results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 248 +- results-vs-first/results.csv | 248 +- results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3738 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 244 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 16 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 3059 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 3335 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 34324 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 698426 +++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 24422 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 56 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 2869 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3372 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 19054 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 620635 ++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 23612 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 42 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 130 +- results-vs-prev/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/results-full.csv | 3477 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 254 +- results-vs-prev/results.csv | 254 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 4400 +- results_id | 2 +- 70 files changed, 1056996 insertions(+), 1063284 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/481.wrf.symbols-improvement delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/mail-body.txt delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/mail-subject.txt create mode 100755 jenkins/notify.sh delete mode 100644 mail/changes-list-long.txt delete mode 100644 mail/changes-list-short.txt create mode 100644 mail/check-regression-status.txt delete mode 100644 mail/last_good.sh delete mode 100644 mail/short-diag.txt