This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO.

discards fb2c5d222 onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 3d563f603 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards d2f9b1287 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 75cc847ad onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 03ad735d3 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 580705726 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards f1d8d1b14 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 7b83c1b74 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards a462e9aa8 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 43fd54303 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards cded96bf9 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 98a3eadfb 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards bc61b991e 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 47032fdff 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 0a5ae06fe 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 0cc56746d 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 7cbfa736e 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards afe3f7508 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards e3b11b26e 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 26771b72f 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 49ad64961 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 70d406b60 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 816cee4de 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 21e249113 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards e82e98ccd 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] discards 61707b974 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] discards ca4e41218 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards b1c0db0d3 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] discards be45af9a4 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards cbb422961 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] discards 6ffdedd20 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] discards ae34e9edb 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards 1bc0ede7b 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards daf0413f1 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] discards b9ec8023a 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] discards cd9f5b93b 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards 2036b2813 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits discards becf7c321 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] discards 782bb9a11 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] discards d3373e5ef 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits discards e239cc3cd 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards b62cf9cda 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards 469238242 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards c38ebdabd 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 879947355 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards df2d0bef6 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards 086c7bea0 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] discards 0aa723d64 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 9fce19a8f 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] discards 5efac435f 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 5d652dd80 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] discards 240ce5dcc 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 1baded3f1 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 35cc8a6f9 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 0fd816671 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 2d042f52b 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 95c2e7b69 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 5c617ff1d 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] discards 604a19f2e 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards ca7c6f0bc 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 3932933cf 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] discards 280d8c9d7 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards ad1655403 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 71b0bc0e3 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] discards eb75b4bc3 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] discards 1c6e59b15 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards 6b46908ec 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 69d18aeaa 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] discards fd9d5d644 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards 255f62562 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards c463f8788 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] discards 67a5c1086 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits discards 4d9260be4 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards 1a904fff3 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits discards 9abdc8fe2 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] discards c06143047 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards 629587491 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards dc0160f44 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards d0a4dc35c 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards f5fdf5bb1 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 441353bb9 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards 361b80745 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 652795b49 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 0998b60e8 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards fb4f43ba8 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards a055362f5 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards ccb18af74 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] discards 9a717e31a 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards 76f382fbc 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits discards fc3aff3e6 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] discards 792d49e55 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards 45b128cba 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits new 3f469bced onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new b86bdb22a 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new d7c8f4f42 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] new 31d9f65a2 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits new 0f398724a 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new 8f6475d68 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new 24f8e6d76 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new ef63827a3 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 658fa77c3 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ff789903d 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new fc09d8326 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b2d1dda05 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 2a131bc3e 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e52c3148a 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new d7802cf99 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new f466618d3 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new e2e35d37f 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 7bf0bca02 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] new 3e01115bf 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new 15e76c191 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new f4c5b5ea5 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits new 0c8a725fa 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new 25732c2f4 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new eb106b109 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 7739847b9 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new 4f35e5b43 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 577eb8aac 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new 6e68b03a9 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] new 83c273d0b 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] new c10e4e984 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 41a4a0176 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 20cb83489 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new 12f094bea 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 2330868de 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 291bd552a 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] new 65e16d8aa 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new eb62dd9a4 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new ffda2efaf 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 2f6f90f8d 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new b621a14d6 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new e08491124 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 0353f26bf 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] new e4e472200 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 2f86fb441 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new eb570d440 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new bafc3f721 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] new a4a4e8b3f 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 82199bf70 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new fdb63a7a1 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new b31555996 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 7dd8cbcac 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 441a5aee0 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new 1c36e0301 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new 0732ad200 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] new bacbc786a 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] new a171d4777 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits new 97202e999 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new beeb62180 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new 6cee11e92 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] new 47f626d15 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 3b5795246 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 2540bd842 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new 8155e1a68 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] new 86eb543ac 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new b37445ac4 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new ced52ee6f 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 9f1b4fe55 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new db9adc711 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new ce092158a 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 28ca43f1b 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 282f40891 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new d7dc16b8e 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new b3e3322db 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 66c82e57d 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 1ec4bb593 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new edecb0860 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 026edfa44 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new f0ab054a5 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new c191cecfc 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 1de7fbd02 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 810349222 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new add24b270 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new c3cce2171 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 78ddb7e55 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 5d16d2e20 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new d437650b8 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 4b3535d4d onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new c5cf4ffd5 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new e6a0642a2 onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new f66526178 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new d54eb05cb onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 36a24a983 onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (fb2c5d222) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 92 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: