This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_size-spec2k6/gnu-aarch64-master-Os_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.

discards 3db1d217ce 109: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 071c0deed3 108: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 7023bfd9d1 107: onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards a6874efba8 106: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards a7ebed4ee7 105: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 91ed32aaee 104: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 4b16ed2d95 103: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 867047015e 102: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards fbe5a96ff2 101: force: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] discards 02bd058b3a 100: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards ebbe94bc37 99: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 61895450f5 98: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 96fd7dc210 97: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 1000022f21 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards d323ac1490 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards a6ce92ef56 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 23 commits discards a65b77e7fa 93: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after basepoints/gcc-13 [...] discards df6cbb7ed0 92: force: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 148 commits discards 7547edf3cc 91: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/linu [...] discards 006fde39a5 90: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 293be83186 89: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.2.8-4846 [...] discards edcfe8148a 88: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards 5c405d9a46 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 5292767820 86: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 5 commits discards 2b81eb8e60 85: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2% [...] discards 509c28c197 84: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 41 commits discards c908655010 83: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] discards 4236e8d246 82: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards e629acb550 81: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards c3a383dc00 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards e61c103617 79: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards d0469dc710 78: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards dde18bb49b 77: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards c738f11ab1 76: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 5033dd2dac 75: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards fccf809720 74: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards f8bdd141e3 73: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 60b65b07ce 72: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 80fadd220d 71: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 77f6a34aff 70: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 70928bebbc 69: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards dd4c3a06d9 68: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards d5ac34f80d 67: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards d35562c056 66: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 9820862ead 65: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 9a301abc3c 64: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards d12a25cfe9 63: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 4c3854ed3b 62: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng reduced in size by [...] discards 4df6aa8169 61: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 78da72f669 60: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards c2c097585e 59: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 8b6cfb24ee 58: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards ad6caa46b5 57: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards ebae70affb 56: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 86200027d5 55: onsuccess: #366: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 949 commits discards 5902d1b55b 54: force: #365: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng grew in size by 4% a [...] discards 8c8d22314e 53: force: #364: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 19 commits discards becc4ce2e8 52: onsuccess: #363: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 112 [...] discards c6eb9c4505 51: onsuccess: #362: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 62 commits discards c1282d9682 50: onsuccess: #347: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards b17b61e83e 49: onsuccess: #344: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 34 commits discards c0e50b8356 48: onsuccess: #342: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 499ad54495 47: onsuccess: #332: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 7a7b5b36c7 46: onsuccess: #330: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-416 [...] discards 4f50d41632 45: onsuccess: #328: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards f35b155072 44: onsuccess: #326: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards df7c7b442b 43: onsuccess: #325: 1: [TCWG CI] 450.soplex reduced in size [...] discards e4f9b327f3 42: onsuccess: #324: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD reduced in si [...] discards 8d76351f89 41: force: #323: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2 [...] discards 56ad61199b 40: onsuccess: #321: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 9e449281a7 39: onsuccess: #319: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 879c26a4d5 38: onsuccess: #317: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 3775f4ecaf 37: onsuccess: #316: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards f40bbf1acc 36: onsuccess: #313: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards f04c883ea3 35: onsuccess: #312: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 53e7c0f6f2 34: onsuccess: #311: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 00db0fb6ad 33: onsuccess: #310: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards c82d6a1015 32: onsuccess: #308: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 26c0550619 31: onsuccess: #307: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards cb0384e35e 30: onsuccess: #306: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD reduced in si [...] discards 68789cde9b 29: onsuccess: #305: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 16dc00b039 28: onsuccess: #304: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 13 commits discards 0dd4ba0a67 27: force: #303: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2 [...] discards 51cd1efe0b 26: force: #302: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 104 commits discards 03784b21e2 25: onsuccess: #301: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.9-39 [...] discards 8639e722e7 24: onsuccess: #300: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits discards d145f1212b 23: onsuccess: #298: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards fdbd1f5e63 22: onsuccess: #295: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 1b82f93a74 21: onsuccess: #294: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 252 commits discards 7ffa709725 20: force: #293: 1: [TCWG CI] 450.soplex grew in size by 2% [...] discards 7db3104a7e 19: force: #292: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 27 commits discards 834f5211f6 18: onsuccess: #291: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.7-39 [...] discards 48a3d74170 17: onsuccess: #290: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 9 commits discards 3614579eb3 16: onsuccess: #288: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards c42338ea1b 15: onsuccess: #286: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.5-39 [...] discards ee75ab1cf7 14: onsuccess: #285: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 28 commits discards 1073a4473f 13: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/gli [...] discards d4efcf141a 12: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/lin [...] discards eebd11da73 11: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/lin [...] discards f43c95d255 10: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/linux/ [...] discards 89c194507e 9: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/glibc: [...] new f1cedafb5f 9: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/glibc: [...] new 59cf03a752 10: onsuccess: 1: Successful build after binutils/gcc/linux/ [...] new 4c83fb4529 11: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/lin [...] new 6e9a28c663 12: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/lin [...] new c45338c1ae 13: onsuccess: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc/gli [...] new 000d3d6424 14: onsuccess: #285: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 28 commits new 2e9a60d430 15: onsuccess: #286: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.5-39 [...] new eaafa3e119 16: onsuccess: #288: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 6b40a9d840 17: onsuccess: #290: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 9 commits new 91fff0ab55 18: onsuccess: #291: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.7-39 [...] new a85591abcc 19: force: #292: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 27 commits new 554152f442 20: force: #293: 1: [TCWG CI] 450.soplex grew in size by 2% [...] new 45cc97d2d5 21: onsuccess: #294: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 252 commits new 1e59af9886 22: onsuccess: #295: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new be3532f856 23: onsuccess: #298: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 2c9aa89de8 24: onsuccess: #300: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 7 commits new 1b364fa200 25: onsuccess: #301: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v5.19.9-39 [...] new 348f2a2f90 26: force: #302: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 104 commits new 139b06563f 27: force: #303: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2 [...] new bad376f40c 28: onsuccess: #304: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 13 commits new 892a3ea36b 29: onsuccess: #305: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new f3256d3749 30: onsuccess: #306: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD reduced in si [...] new 3c397fa272 31: onsuccess: #307: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 0fbc333e69 32: onsuccess: #308: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 03d0fc8195 33: onsuccess: #310: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new b47a84b8c5 34: onsuccess: #311: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 51f94e3a91 35: onsuccess: #312: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new d439e4c590 36: onsuccess: #313: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 1940977512 37: onsuccess: #316: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 8ec404e719 38: onsuccess: #317: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 391611acf7 39: onsuccess: #319: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new bdb6906296 40: onsuccess: #321: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 476fb0b3c3 41: force: #323: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2 [...] new 83b3fdf2fb 42: onsuccess: #324: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD reduced in si [...] new 899b611f96 43: onsuccess: #325: 1: [TCWG CI] 450.soplex reduced in size [...] new da1798d22c 44: onsuccess: #326: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 5d9649825f 45: onsuccess: #328: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new a6fc87f67d 46: onsuccess: #330: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-416 [...] new 532b34aa86 47: onsuccess: #332: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 99f7e7ccf1 48: onsuccess: #342: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 79d4fba543 49: onsuccess: #344: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 34 commits new 38caf83308 50: onsuccess: #347: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 4f9f60983d 51: onsuccess: #362: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 62 commits new 7ae3934718 52: onsuccess: #363: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 112 [...] new 6b33904c80 53: force: #364: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 19 commits new c27eaae728 54: force: #365: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng grew in size by 4% a [...] new 2657ccaac1 55: onsuccess: #366: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 949 commits new 09cab09230 56: onsuccess: #367: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 6343819a3a 57: onsuccess: #368: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new a86a76a409 58: onsuccess: #369: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 232302317b 59: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 269a4546a0 60: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 54fe1524a4 61: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 7388e6a2c1 62: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 458.sjeng reduced in size by [...] new 9210cf3047 63: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 9abe60511a 64: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 0faa79f6a4 65: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 1dcbb3f79b 66: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 8e9f342646 67: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 5273fbbe7b 68: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new e757e325b2 69: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 4a97a88e16 70: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new ae5247ea96 71: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 0ea6099d8e 72: onsuccess: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new c8273cb7ca 73: onsuccess: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new c9a72e1f3c 74: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 5b9b2e1799 75: onsuccess: #1: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 86759c8e44 76: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 3b7d8d7b0a 77: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 15d0bddc57 78: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 964b6717de 79: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 341d95eac3 80: onsuccess: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new b0b61ae35e 81: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new f718377cbd 82: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new dc9065e407 83: onsuccess: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] new bf6502a021 84: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 41 commits new ab238826dd 85: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2% [...] new add33b8bdb 86: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 5 commits new 977463b532 87: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 9fbbfc31f4 88: onsuccess: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new c9ae508d03 89: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.2.8-4846 [...] new fd066aa17c 90: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 2f6fef7718 91: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/linu [...] new 5a29ba1a6f 92: force: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 148 commits new 5133a986b7 93: force: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after basepoints/gcc-13 [...] new be4f714449 94: onsuccess: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after gcc: 23 commits new 980c549aba 95: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 2c9f066259 96: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 2f71d1f3c0 97: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 00503d934a 98: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 7482d45938 99: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new c47d73f9b2 100: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new f4eae44732 101: force: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 5f4c6ecff3 102: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...] new 3053b2e19c 103: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 7448dd6063 104: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new d2207ebc9d 105: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new c155e73d47 106: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 853f39698b 107: onsuccess: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 2c9f5f922e 108: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new ad760c4815 109: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 692b0d1885 110: onsuccess: #52: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (3db1d217ce) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_size-spec2k6/gn [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2240 -> 2200 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2420 -> 2464 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27896 -> 27912 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz | Bin 0 -> 18172 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 73804 -> 73896 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz | Bin 0 -> 53076 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 332 -> 364 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 7660 -> 7692 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 244348 -> 244596 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/make-glibc.log.xz | Bin 0 -> 194612 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 180188 -> 181968 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz | Bin 0 -> 147952 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 103 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 101 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4028 -> 4072 bytes 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 8152 -> 7804 bytes .../output-bmk-results/exe.improvement | 2 - .../output-bmk-results/exe.improvement.diff | 1 - .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression | 1 - .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression.diff | 1 - 11-update_baseline/console.log | 48 +- git/binutils_rev | 2 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- git/glibc_rev | 2 +- manifest.sh | 28 +- results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 62 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 145 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 2584 ++++++++-------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 2508 ++++++++-------- results-vs-first/interesting-symbols.csv | 1 + results-vs-first/results-brief.csv | 69 +- results-vs-first/results-full.csv | 173 +- results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 75 +- results-vs-first/results.csv | 75 +- results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 2678 ++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 75 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 1 - results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 151 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 171 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 145 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 2584 ++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 2508 ++++++++-------- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 1 + results-vs-prev/results-brief.csv | 69 +- results-vs-prev/results-full.csv | 179 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 75 +- results-vs-prev/results.csv | 75 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3150 ++++++++++---------- results_id | 2 +- 49 files changed, 8923 insertions(+), 8924 deletions(-) create mode 100644 03-build_abe-binutils/make-binutils.log.xz create mode 100644 04-build_abe-stage1/make-gcc-stage1.log.xz create mode 100644 07-build_abe-glibc/make-glibc.log.xz create mode 100644 08-build_abe-stage2/make-gcc-stage2.log.xz delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.improvement delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.improvement.diff delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.regression delete mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.regression.diff