This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3 in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts.

discards 24a35f14d4 102: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 519e6fd492 101: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards dc9410c33e 100: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] discards 56c5133c69 99: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 651f88fe4c 98: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards a8cba24f4a 97: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 5809937228 96: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 42c4c78e19 95: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] discards 7fa2132651 94: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 63 commits discards f2c73d76b9 93: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] discards bbae4ca580 92: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 128ce84964 91: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] discards 2aa1fde3e5 90: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 6f3de3a426 89: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 1b0454b299 88: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards b12395e944 87: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 53fa20a19c 86: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 106 commits discards fc137058b3 85: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 16% [...] discards efed3e7605 84: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -13% [...] discards 38589acf58 83: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards 19f18aeb15 82: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards 8a9cd6fdce 81: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1696 [...] discards aa6cccff55 80: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards ae59e1aabb 79: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 9 [...] discards a525e3711c 78: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 19% [...] discards dcde11265e 77: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards 2d77d46fc5 76: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 11% [...] discards 0dc9e25442 75: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits discards 6e3c88e2a0 74: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] discards 3a722246c1 73: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards ab63bcb427 72: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 commits discards 7a2cc67686 71: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits discards cbd106c0d1 70: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards 43256027c5 69: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 2313819430 68: force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 5b838fc075 67: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards d9f8c681e2 66: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 4d21773e13 65: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 3250a15715 64: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 5f7851593e 63: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards b89a4f3190 62: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 341 commits discards d900fb3184 61: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] discards 9b4b61beb4 60: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 9 commits discards 6eacb71179 59: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards f7462736dc 58: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 45050b0d15 57: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] discards fdb177ae8f 56: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards b3faa087a8 55: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.9000 [...] discards a2f667b3f7 54: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] discards 515a843dd9 53: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] discards c0424151a0 52: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 044840a88a 51: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] discards 79f860a114 50: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] discards 4e277ef960 49: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] discards 025a49297f 48: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits discards c62d188338 47: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 54 commits discards bbc8779146 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] discards 675b759145 45: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 3d1f431fa1 44: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] discards e9c2dc4fd6 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -7 [...] discards 8a0067272e 42: onsuccess: #543: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36 [...] discards 490bc8caf4 41: onsuccess: #541: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK a [...] discards f7331af29a 40: force: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards e6f245d4f2 39: onsuccess: #535: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] discards e51d92a422 38: force: #524: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] discards 756da5aa63 37: force: #523: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray:[.] _ZN3pov17Check_ [...] discards 23c6e054cf 36: force: #522: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 32a77c8f83 35: onsuccess: #520: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards 9c00124978 34: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 37f4fae8f8 33: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 76af722dd4 32: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 01a4f0a279 31: onsuccess: #512: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] discards e56ad8fd7f 30: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 86 commits discards 35206d9781 29: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 957261ed58 28: onsuccess: #507: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards 32ec67e6fe 27: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards da2534405d 26: onsuccess: #505: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits discards 198b60e613 25: force: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards 106df63290 24: force: #503: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 71 commits discards 6cf1d86b63 23: force: #501: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] discards c4401ceb6b 22: force: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref:[.] __memcpy_neon [...] discards 6d0a93e2bc 21: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards fe3d3bbf39 20: onsuccess: #496: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 103 commits discards 4b94e95116 19: force: #495: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 slowed down by 4% [...] discards ef479bb548 18: force: #494: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 96 commits discards 6bc8a95180 17: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards aa759768a2 16: force: #489: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] discards 45753feaa3 15: onsuccess: #488: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 122 [...] discards dccfa295f7 14: onsuccess: #487: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits discards 576fb3fb45 13: onsuccess: #483: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 speeds up by - [...] discards 493b5ed922 12: onsuccess: #482: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards dad13c5b72 11: onsuccess: #479: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards b9bac82abf 10: onsuccess: #478: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] discards c9405dd442 9: force: #472: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 14% [...] discards a0a778d8c1 8: force: #463: 1: [TCWG CI] 445.gobmk:[.] fastlib slowed do [...] discards 1be4eebf67 7: force: #461: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% afte [...] discards 77c622fbd9 6: force: #460: 1: [TCWG CI] 447.dealII built and run OK aft [...] discards a192d4fff4 5: force: #458: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp slowed down by 7% a [...] discards beeee2d0a4 4: force: #457: 1: [TCWG CI] 447.dealII failed to build afte [...] discards 850a54107f 3: onsuccess: #456: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 7624 [...] discards 0c799e7453 2: onsuccess: #455: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 564 commits new 838a608faf 2: onsuccess: #455: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 564 commits new ae7ecda32e 3: onsuccess: #456: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 7624 [...] new 473eb5aabd 4: force: #457: 1: [TCWG CI] 447.dealII failed to build afte [...] new b5e7117d6a 5: force: #458: 1: [TCWG CI] 471.omnetpp slowed down by 7% a [...] new 20638302d3 6: force: #460: 1: [TCWG CI] 447.dealII built and run OK aft [...] new 10aab5a172 7: force: #461: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% afte [...] new 27a7d5b1df 8: force: #463: 1: [TCWG CI] 445.gobmk:[.] fastlib slowed do [...] new 3e10e022b7 9: force: #472: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 14% [...] new 262b0a64b6 10: onsuccess: #478: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new b0649f7818 11: onsuccess: #479: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new b1304cc55e 12: onsuccess: #482: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 9ff0be955a 13: onsuccess: #483: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 speeds up by - [...] new c11e6e118c 14: onsuccess: #487: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 36 commits new e1275c6c3f 15: onsuccess: #488: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 122 [...] new e4c2f779f4 16: force: #489: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new 4e6467e135 17: onsuccess: #491: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 1bfe014126 18: force: #494: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 96 commits new d29f5fd3cc 19: force: #495: 1: [TCWG CI] 482.sphinx3 slowed down by 4% [...] new 400c8d241e 20: onsuccess: #496: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 103 commits new 1c9ceeb5b9 21: onsuccess: #498: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 04487a1287 22: force: #500: 1: [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref:[.] __memcpy_neon [...] new 90bc709050 23: force: #501: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new 25866428f5 24: force: #503: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 71 commits new 52b718ec35 25: force: #504: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc [...] new 5615882d74 26: onsuccess: #505: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 4 commits new b632162bc8 27: onsuccess: #506: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 2a58e94b11 28: onsuccess: #507: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new 9b2b1b41d3 29: onsuccess: #508: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new c2d7eed026 30: onsuccess: #511: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 86 commits new 415e1f0ad3 31: onsuccess: #512: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 6c78fd67d3 32: force: #514: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new dd6a3cf4a5 33: onsuccess: #515: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new edb6aef936 34: onsuccess: #516: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/g [...] new b60769e48f 35: onsuccess: #520: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: [...] new 6208931d8f 36: force: #522: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build [...] new a617f2941f 37: force: #523: 1: [TCWG CI] 453.povray:[.] _ZN3pov17Check_ [...] new f9fedce365 38: force: #524: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new c3e8df8d5a 39: onsuccess: #535: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by [...] new 8be7dca339 40: force: #539: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after [...] new 5bd5b0df2d 41: onsuccess: #541: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK a [...] new 23ffcf1505 42: onsuccess: #543: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36 [...] new 20b207d5af 43: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -7 [...] new 5c2b3c10d8 44: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] new e9d5246f06 45: onsuccess: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 914f1ebd74 46: onsuccess: #2: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK aft [...] new 9089ebe253 47: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 54 commits new 03457314dc 48: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits new fce8914fbf 49: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after ba [...] new ed916564d6 50: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build af [...] new 9c7d0ee90d 51: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after l [...] new eb189b7776 52: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new dcaa4c536d 53: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK [...] new 7a9c6b3070 54: force: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after g [...] new f5b54fd7a4 55: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc-2.36.9000 [...] new faa7b41073 56: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new fc75ac36da 57: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 2f75a67154 58: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 51b58fae45 59: onsuccess: #30: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 2eeace3afa 60: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 9 commits new 60b113bef4 61: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new 2f6106f76b 62: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 341 commits new c75ee75562 63: force: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 6e07360f45 64: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new b62c9e9f09 65: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new d03d11fe8c 66: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new f4046c04d7 67: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 0faf3cf8a0 68: force: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 8bec6a93cc 69: onsuccess: #46: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 37e3d82d72 70: onsuccess: #47: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new 8809889424 71: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 6 commits new dfe02b8db9 72: force: #6: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 4 commits new ad840d23aa 73: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 5901ed6b75 74: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -1 [...] new 7b834a41cf 75: force: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 2 commits new bff8a5e389 76: force: #10: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 11% [...] new d27847407e 77: onsuccess: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 1ec3804825 78: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 19% [...] new 3767b6978b 79: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 9 [...] new 82811074fd 80: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new f37b48cb4f 81: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 1696 [...] new 8d85ec2f6e 82: force: #19: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after basepoints/gcc- [...] new f477dec3b6 83: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new 81d2536f0d 84: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -13% [...] new 836869fdbb 85: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 16% [...] new cbce8f12d5 86: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 106 commits new dc929971b9 87: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 069f06bb49 88: onsuccess: #26: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new e7f5c93b73 89: onsuccess: #27: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 5d345b036f 90: onsuccess: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by - [...] new 7e4732a9a6 91: force: #31: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% [...] new 0fd7239f5d 92: onsuccess: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new d20f228b12 93: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/li [...] new c63771bab1 94: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 63 commits new eccac25c85 95: onsuccess: #36: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new dff913d074 96: onsuccess: #37: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 7b805179d9 97: onsuccess: #38: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new d266f5ec09 98: onsuccess: #39: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/ [...] new 1cea6f78b1 99: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 7dd829e296 100: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new 9a3139cbc2 101: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new ebf27a5b68 102: onsuccess: #48: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/ [...] new dcd8695b8b 103: force: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (24a35f14d4) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 102 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: 01-reset_artifacts/console.log.xz | Bin 2028 -> 2028 bytes 02-prepare_abe/console.log.xz | Bin 2436 -> 2408 bytes 03-build_abe-binutils/console.log.xz | Bin 27088 -> 27368 bytes 04-build_abe-stage1/console.log.xz | Bin 90380 -> 91008 bytes 05-clean_sysroot/console.log.xz | Bin 336 -> 336 bytes 06-build_abe-linux/console.log.xz | Bin 8368 -> 7632 bytes 07-build_abe-glibc/console.log.xz | Bin 233188 -> 234272 bytes 08-build_abe-stage2/console.log.xz | Bin 211836 -> 212236 bytes 09-benchmark/benchmark-build.log | 158 +- 09-benchmark/benchmark.log | 156 +- 09-benchmark/console.log.xz | Bin 4144 -> 4144 bytes 10-check_regression/bmk-specific-variability.csv | 171 +- 10-check_regression/console.log.xz | Bin 16468 -> 17524 bytes .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression | 1 + .../output-bmk-results/exe.regression.diff | 1 + .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement | 17 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.improvement.diff | 2 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression | 13 +- .../output-bmk-results/symbol.regression.diff | 2 +- 11-update_baseline/console.log | 74 +- git/gcc_rev | 2 +- jenkins/notify.sh | 2 +- manifest.sh | 24 +- results-vs-first/compare-results-internal.csv | 230 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 2768 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/results.csv | 770654 +++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/size.csv | 760870 ++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 30358 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 936 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 3114 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3355 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/results.csv | 767055 ++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/size.csv | 769766 ++++++++--------- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 30548 +- results-vs-first/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 1326 +- results-vs-first/interesting-symbols.csv | 146 +- results-vs-first/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-first/results-full.csv | 3353 +- results-vs-first/results-internal.csv | 244 +- results-vs-first/results.csv | 244 +- results-vs-first/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3402 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results-internal.csv | 239 +- results-vs-prev/compare-results.csv | 9 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/md5sum.csv | 2990 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/perf.csv | 3322 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/results.csv | 747202 ++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/size.csv | 750168 ++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/sve.csv | 30440 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-0/vect.csv | 1082 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/md5sum.csv | 3112 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/perf.csv | 3355 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/results.csv | 767055 ++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/size.csv | 769766 ++++++++--------- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/sve.csv | 30548 +- results-vs-prev/csv-results-1/vect.csv | 1326 +- results-vs-prev/interesting-symbols.csv | 146 +- results-vs-prev/results-brief.csv | 68 +- results-vs-prev/results-full.csv | 3473 +- results-vs-prev/results-internal.csv | 250 +- results-vs-prev/results.csv | 250 +- results-vs-prev/tcwg-benchmark-results.log | 3910 +- results_id | 2 +- 62 files changed, 3169577 insertions(+), 3098196 deletions(-) create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.regression create mode 100644 10-check_regression/output-bmk-results/exe.regression.diff