This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

tcwg-buildslave pushed a change to branch linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO in repository toolchain/ci/base-artifacts/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/gnu-arm-master-O3_LTO.

discards d72443019 onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 0e7d78c4b onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 3d7b4f51e onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards b4eee2cbd onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards fd3f5ee7e onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 2d9aa837c onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 087b2c111 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 6eaa17e72 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 17d056161 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards a12204306 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 1091b8679 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 4b9002d7e 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 2c53e9f83 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 68e05e27f 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards 731155d84 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] discards 2127b4dd5 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] discards c7fbaf9a7 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards b568081f7 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards b80278711 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 58b58d1de 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards bcdaf47d2 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards 33fb31d4a 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] discards 9ef06f327 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards efbeb419b 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] discards dfb9d2495 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] discards bc14f7fb3 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] discards 1acbc2564 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards d86af6dbc 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] discards fb1bd29d1 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] discards b0c978e4f 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] discards e0dd89821 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] discards 9089ec38b 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards 7d2fd40f0 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] discards bebc2a94d 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] discards 2b8bd060f 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] discards 0b7e55b52 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] discards e57582446 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits discards fc1cb2f61 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] discards 505ed7a20 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] discards 19c905179 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits discards 4378bbe4b 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits discards 15a4f1319 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards 41374e13f 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 3d4eea545 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards 6309791c4 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] discards 12244de83 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] discards 9ad456e9d 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] discards 8249315f7 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] discards b098b26ef 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] discards 79c13172c 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards b732cd9c1 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] discards 01fac53f1 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards bd003292b 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards f46968471 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards 0ae5c0759 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards 7d44ad237 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards c6622beea 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards 36dba29b5 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] discards 50cb0b0a9 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 31316fa41 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards a029b0f0c 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] discards 884514e7d 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] discards cbca3cb5a 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] discards d7546cbcb 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] discards f5ce3b3ab 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] discards c46c9cf83 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] discards 93e5dad2c 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] discards 3e223d6d2 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] discards def58d41f 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] discards 99873d6b5 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] discards e011c85d7 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] discards 91aecff3d 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits discards c969a6a9a 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] discards d8c813122 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits discards ef5da6dc6 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] discards ace34134e 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] discards d3c508f6c 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards c708d88f9 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] discards 513bb468d 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] discards a0a6b2443 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 4350ada68 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards ef8f6d482 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 765490857 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 212fcccf2 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards eb3414a66 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] discards 7a3a93189 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] discards 10df688a8 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] discards 01381be7e 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits discards 8ad11bbdc 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits discards 99e050a11 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] discards b5c960d0d 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] discards f0a68f685 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits discards 2707cabee 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] discards ac98c90e8 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] discards 6077976f9 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] discards afac68777 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits discards 44f9ad986 19: onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 5ce2d44b1 onsuccess: #412: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new 5155672ca 20: onsuccess: #416: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 32 commits new 3aec9389e 21: onsuccess: #417: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.6-4167 [...] new 5e0f10166 22: force: #418: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new 95be69172 23: onsuccess: #420: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new ddab82595 24: onsuccess: #421: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 193 commits new 48f0776b8 25: onsuccess: #422: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -6% [...] new 311854ae4 26: onsuccess: #424: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 6 [...] new c757e6a23 27: onsuccess: #425: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 119 commits new 7a27e169b 28: onsuccess: #426: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 14 commits new bcc2cc4a5 29: onsuccess: #427: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.8-4167 [...] new dd804f01c 30: onsuccess: #429: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 3 [...] new 910089e32 31: onsuccess: #431: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new da3726dd9 32: onsuccess: #432: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 49983382a 33: onsuccess: #433: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 1bffc036f 34: onsuccess: #435: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 3d30d99c6 35: onsuccess: #437: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gl [...] new 2fbb376f2 36: onsuccess: #444: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gc [...] new 667a8056c 37: onsuccess: #446: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new a504bfb8a 38: force: #448: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM failed to build a [...] new 0e2284b3a 39: onsuccess: #450: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 5 [...] new 0d74a184b 40: onsuccess: #452: 1: [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM built and run [...] new 7926ee7a2 41: onsuccess: #453: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after v6.0.16-416 [...] new 2b5a95a0c 42: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 111 commits new bb8a998ba 43: onsuccess: #5: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline buil [...] new 60030cda0 44: onsuccess: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 82 commits new b73aa5af9 45: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer slowed down by 4% afte [...] new e6d742906 46: force: #13: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new fdf4bee0d 47: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf built and run OK after g [...] new 9854de53e 48: onsuccess: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline bui [...] new a728e4716 49: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new e357ce555 50: onsuccess: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess built and run OK [...] new acc86edad 51: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build afte [...] new 3c279fa3f 52: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gdb [...] new d61624c1b 53: force: #11: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new d86631452 54: force: #12: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 1989eb63d 55: force: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after li [...] new debb963a0 56: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new a03091b1d 57: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 416.gamess failed to build after [...] new 64b23cd46 58: onsuccess: #18: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils: 36 [...] new 83e034d47 59: force: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new fa1b0bf2a 60: force: #21: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new ffffd4a87 61: force: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD failed to build aft [...] new 4c64e2831 62: force: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 02b3f78e6 63: force: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 481.wrf failed to build after gl [...] new 930e7edee 64: force: #28: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new a6cc2e854 65: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK after [...] new 73b5be537 66: force: #32: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto failed to build after [...] new 5a29d8119 67: onsuccess: #33: 1: [TCWG CI] 465.tonto built and run OK a [...] new 086b36eb2 68: onsuccess: #34: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 746db5f58 69: onsuccess: #35: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -9 [...] new 478db0608 70: onsuccess: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new a8ad007ac 71: force: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 20% [...] new 38dc48d3e 72: onsuccess: #42: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new 9241575bc 73: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after binutils/gcc [...] new b84e724af 74: onsuccess: #45: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -8 [...] new 6fb210074 75: onsuccess: #3: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after gcc: 57 commits new 70296e269 76: onsuccess: #4: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after glibc: 12 commits new 7ef14d6b5 77: force: #7: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -6% aft [...] new 96833e8c8 78: force: #8: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% af [...] new 741361a22 79: onsuccess: #9: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after linux: 45638 commits new bab5575df 80: onsuccess: #14: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new fe3c66029 81: force: #15: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 5% a [...] new 72ca6e042 82: force: #16: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4% af [...] new cdc06e6fd 83: force: #17: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 17% [...] new dbbc4d57b 84: onsuccess: #20: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -4 [...] new 7a81e27a7 85: force: #22: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d slowed down by 7% a [...] new 52a59e8ac 86: onsuccess: #23: 1: [TCWG CI] 401.bzip2 speeds up by -4% a [...] new ef2a255cf 87: onsuccess: #24: 1: [TCWG CI] 456.hmmer speeds up by -4% a [...] new ff0ecc2a3 88: onsuccess: #25: 1: [TCWG CI] 437.leslie3d speeds up by -5 [...] new 9d1ce37af 89: force: #29: 1: [TCWG CI] No change after baseline build: [...] new b83750636 90: force: #40: 1: [TCWG CI] Failure after baseline build: no [...] new 401922dc1 91: onsuccess: #41: 1: [TCWG CI] Success after binutils/gcc/l [...] new aa94ac055 92: onsuccess: #43: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new ae3e93e93 93: onsuccess: #44: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new fd7f8108d 94: force: #49: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 5c75e6a43 95: onsuccess: #50: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 0bf9e2d99 96: onsuccess: #51: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new e0bfb6a76 97: onsuccess: #53: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 2d7e32c24 98: onsuccess: #54: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 52646b07b 99: onsuccess: #55: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tc [...] new 997cd7c4d 100: onsuccess: #57: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 595a54677 101: force: #61: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new a6266b810 102: onsuccess: #62: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new e34ebf043 103: onsuccess: #63: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 066da1ae8 104: onsuccess: #66: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new be2c0ba09 105: onsuccess: #67: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/t [...] new 6f3d7b397 onsuccess: #68: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 0b23d8cf5 onsuccess: #69: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new a178cf988 onsuccess: #70: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new d19346063 onsuccess: #83: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 3dd480174 onsuccess: #94: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new b90a6a494 onsuccess: #96: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new 93dea4a5f onsuccess: #97: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_b [...] new c01ceb1e8 onsuccess: #100: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new f79a0b7e4 onsuccess: #101: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...] new ef90d61c1 onsuccess: #102: 1: [TCWG CI] https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_ [...]

This update added new revisions after undoing existing revisions. That is to say, some revisions that were in the old version of the branch are not in the new version. This situation occurs when a user --force pushes a change and generates a repository containing something like this:

* -- * -- B -- O -- O -- O (d72443019) \ N -- N -- N refs/heads/linaro-local/ci/tcwg_bmk-code_speed-spec2k6/g [...]

You should already have received notification emails for all of the O revisions, and so the following emails describe only the N revisions from the common base, B.

Any revisions marked "omits" are not gone; other references still refer to them. Any revisions marked "discards" are gone forever.

The 97 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this repository and will be described in separate emails. The revisions listed as "adds" were already present in the repository and have only been added to this reference.

Summary of changes: